Skip to content

model-conversion : remove -st targets for converted model#18689

Merged
danbev merged 1 commit into
ggml-org:masterfrom
danbev:model-conversion-remove-st-pooling-embeddings
Jan 8, 2026
Merged

model-conversion : remove -st targets for converted model#18689
danbev merged 1 commit into
ggml-org:masterfrom
danbev:model-conversion-remove-st-pooling-embeddings

Conversation

@danbev

@danbev danbev commented Jan 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This commit removes the '-st` make target for running the converted embedding model.

The motivation for this is that the pooling type is now part of the .gguf metdata of the model and this is used by llama-debug when running the model. So there is no need to specify the pooling type separately any more.

The commit also adds an option to specify the type of normalization applied to the output embeddings when running the converted model.

And the readme documentation has been updated to reflect these changes.

This commit removes the '-st` make target for running the converted
embedding model.

The motivation for this is that the pooling type is now part of the
.gguf metdata of the model and this is used by llama-debug when running
the model. So there is no need to specify the pooling type separately
any more.

The commit also adds an option to specify the type of normalization
applied to the output embeddings when running the converted model.

And the readme documentation has been  updated to reflect these changes.
@danbev danbev merged commit df7fb92 into ggml-org:master Jan 8, 2026
7 checks passed
gary149 pushed a commit to gary149/llama-agent that referenced this pull request Jan 8, 2026
…8689)

This commit removes the '-st` make target for running the converted
embedding model.

The motivation for this is that the pooling type is now part of the
.gguf metdata of the model and this is used by llama-debug when running
the model. So there is no need to specify the pooling type separately
any more.

The commit also adds an option to specify the type of normalization
applied to the output embeddings when running the converted model.

And the readme documentation has been  updated to reflect these changes.
@danbev danbev deleted the model-conversion-remove-st-pooling-embeddings branch January 14, 2026 08:07
Seunghhon pushed a commit to Seunghhon/llama.cpp that referenced this pull request Apr 26, 2026
…8689)

This commit removes the '-st` make target for running the converted
embedding model.

The motivation for this is that the pooling type is now part of the
.gguf metdata of the model and this is used by llama-debug when running
the model. So there is no need to specify the pooling type separately
any more.

The commit also adds an option to specify the type of normalization
applied to the output embeddings when running the converted model.

And the readme documentation has been  updated to reflect these changes.
ljubomirj pushed a commit to ljubomirj/llama.cpp that referenced this pull request May 6, 2026
…8689)

This commit removes the '-st` make target for running the converted
embedding model.

The motivation for this is that the pooling type is now part of the
.gguf metdata of the model and this is used by llama-debug when running
the model. So there is no need to specify the pooling type separately
any more.

The commit also adds an option to specify the type of normalization
applied to the output embeddings when running the converted model.

And the readme documentation has been  updated to reflect these changes.
my-other-github-account pushed a commit to my-other-github-account/llama.cpp that referenced this pull request May 15, 2026
…8689)

This commit removes the '-st` make target for running the converted
embedding model.

The motivation for this is that the pooling type is now part of the
.gguf metdata of the model and this is used by llama-debug when running
the model. So there is no need to specify the pooling type separately
any more.

The commit also adds an option to specify the type of normalization
applied to the output embeddings when running the converted model.

And the readme documentation has been  updated to reflect these changes.
my-other-github-account pushed a commit to my-other-github-account/llama.cpp that referenced this pull request May 15, 2026
…8689)

This commit removes the '-st` make target for running the converted
embedding model.

The motivation for this is that the pooling type is now part of the
.gguf metdata of the model and this is used by llama-debug when running
the model. So there is no need to specify the pooling type separately
any more.

The commit also adds an option to specify the type of normalization
applied to the output embeddings when running the converted model.

And the readme documentation has been  updated to reflect these changes.
phibya pushed a commit to ziee-ai/llama.cpp that referenced this pull request May 29, 2026
…8689)

This commit removes the '-st` make target for running the converted
embedding model.

The motivation for this is that the pooling type is now part of the
.gguf metdata of the model and this is used by llama-debug when running
the model. So there is no need to specify the pooling type separately
any more.

The commit also adds an option to specify the type of normalization
applied to the output embeddings when running the converted model.

And the readme documentation has been  updated to reflect these changes.
fewtarius pushed a commit to fewtarius/llama.cpp that referenced this pull request May 30, 2026
…8689)

This commit removes the '-st` make target for running the converted
embedding model.

The motivation for this is that the pooling type is now part of the
.gguf metdata of the model and this is used by llama-debug when running
the model. So there is no need to specify the pooling type separately
any more.

The commit also adds an option to specify the type of normalization
applied to the output embeddings when running the converted model.

And the readme documentation has been  updated to reflect these changes.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants