feat(replay): Add getReplay utility function#10510
Merged
Conversation
billyvg
approved these changes
Feb 6, 2024
mydea
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 12, 2024
As pointed out here, and I also did notice that myself, it is not super
nice - as you need to provide a generic integration to
`getIntegrationByName`, which is annoying to do in a type safe way, esp.
if you want to avoid deprecations:
```ts
const client = getClient();
const replay = client && client.getIntegrationByName && client.getIntegrationByName<ReturnType<typeof replayIntegration>>('Replay');
```
So IMHO a small utility `Sentry.getReplay()` is not unreasonable for
this 🤔
|
Thank you! |
This was referenced Feb 14, 2024
This was referenced Mar 12, 2024
This was referenced May 31, 2024
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As pointed out here, and I also did notice that myself, it is not super nice - as you need to provide a generic integration to
getIntegrationByName, which is annoying to do in a type safe way, esp. if you want to avoid deprecations:So IMHO a small utility
Sentry.getReplay()is not unreasonable for this 🤔