@rhcarvalho

@arsmn thanks for the contribution. Sorry we haven't had the bandwidth to review this yet.
On a high level I expect this is pretty much the same as the fasthttp integration with types adapted to match fiber's.

I'll have a look at this and Buffalo (#196) in the coming weeks, perhaps start moving integrations off into their own modules to avoid an ever increasing list of deps in the main go.mod file.

@rhcarvalho gentle ping

@rhcarvalho Can we please merge this ?

Any updates on this? 💐

any news?

@rhcarvalho any update ?

Any update?

Would be nice if this was merged in with official support for Fiber and Sentry.
Are there any issues @rhcarvalho?

any update?
plz

Ping

any update?
plz

Ping and Pong, please.

not yet?

not yet2?

@rhcarvalho @kamilogorek @benvinegar

@arsmn thanks for the contribution. Sorry we haven't had the bandwidth to review this yet. On a high level I expect this is pretty much the same as the fasthttp integration with types adapted to match fiber's.

I'll have a look at this and Buffalo (#196) in the coming weeks, perhaps start moving integrations off into their own modules to avoid an ever increasing list of deps in the main go.mod file.

This is open for 1.5 years now. Is this still on the road map?

I think @arsmn should create PR under the https://github.com/gofiber/contrib.

Fiber integration is now available https://github.com/gofiber/contrib/tree/main/fibersentry
Thank you all

Hey @arsmn
Are you still interested in getting this merged?

Hey @cleptric & @arsmn any chance we could get this merged in? I'd love to have Sentry officially support this!

@robd003 Adding a Fiber integration is definitely on our road map, but I can't provide you with an ETA when this may land.

@cleptric Kind reminder 🙏🏻

Updated to work with the latest main branch in #795

Thanks @arsmn for the contribution and sorry it took so long to get merged.