fix: Missing header detection for the non-strict case#702
Merged
markstory merged 1 commit intogetsentry:masterfrom Jan 30, 2024
Merged
fix: Missing header detection for the non-strict case#702markstory merged 1 commit intogetsentry:masterfrom
markstory merged 1 commit intogetsentry:masterfrom
Conversation
1b4ce0f to
dd7b873
Compare
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #702 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 99.93% 99.93%
=======================================
Files 9 9
Lines 3054 3064 +10
=======================================
+ Hits 3052 3062 +10
Misses 2 2 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Member
|
Thank you 🎉 |
markstory
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 30, 2024
Contributor
Author
|
Thanks @markstory for the merge 🙏 Any idea when |
Member
|
@woodyza I started a release build just now. |
Contributor
Author
|
Awesome, thanks! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi!
When #651 was implemented the header matching rule was subtly broken, making it no longer detect when the specified headers were missing entirely (vs present, but with the wrong value) unless you used strict matching.
As far as I understand that is not the intention, and you should be able to use the header matcher to detect missing headers without necessarily caring about all of the other headers in the request. It's a small change to enable that, and it preserves the strict match and regex match logic.
I've added a test case that fails without the current change, and the rest of the cases still pass with it in place.