Skip to content

ref(processing/store): remove references to feedback attachments option#3617

Merged
aliu39 merged 3 commits intomasterfrom
aliu/rm-feedback-attachments-option
May 21, 2024
Merged

ref(processing/store): remove references to feedback attachments option#3617
aliu39 merged 3 commits intomasterfrom
aliu/rm-feedback-attachments-option

Conversation

@aliu39
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@aliu39 aliu39 commented May 16, 2024

Follow up after https://github.com/getsentry/team-replay/issues/393. We've set the option to true for all regions and tested that it works, so this is a dead code path we can remove

Relates to getsentry/sentry-javascript#11428

#skip-changelog

@aliu39 aliu39 requested a review from a team as a code owner May 16, 2024 23:04
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@jjbayer jjbayer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same question as in #3604: Is this safe for self-hosted?

@aliu39
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

aliu39 commented May 20, 2024

Same question as in #3604: Is this safe for self-hosted?

Unlike 3604, this is the same for self-hosted! The change is backwards-compatible with older SDK versions, as we'll still process feedback and attachments in separate envelopes, even with the flag enabled

@aliu39 aliu39 requested review from a team and jjbayer May 20, 2024 18:19
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@Dav1dde Dav1dde left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should also remove feedback.ingest-inline-attachments from Sentry now.

@aliu39 aliu39 merged commit 1551301 into master May 21, 2024
@aliu39 aliu39 deleted the aliu/rm-feedback-attachments-option branch May 21, 2024 18:20
aliu39 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 4, 2024
…3682)

I missed this in #3617. This
condition never happens since we handle user report v2's in the
for-match loop

#skip-changelog
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants