Fixes #3598: legends size in printing layouts#3599
Merged
tdipisa merged 1 commit intogeosolutions-it:masterfrom Mar 6, 2019
Merged
Fixes #3598: legends size in printing layouts#3599tdipisa merged 1 commit intogeosolutions-it:masterfrom
tdipisa merged 1 commit intogeosolutions-it:masterfrom
Conversation
tdipisa
approved these changes
Mar 6, 2019
Member
|
@mbarto please can you also provide a backport commit to 2019.01.xx? |
mbarto
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 6, 2019
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Fixes legends size in printing layouts.
Issues
Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements
What kind of change does this PR introduce? (check one with "x", remove the others)
What is the current behavior? (You can also link to an open issue here)
Legends can overflow their container.
What is the new behavior?
Legends are constrained inside their containers, and labels are not cut, but flow on new rows.
Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (check one with "x", remove the other)
If this PR contains a breaking change, please describe the impact and migration path for existing applications: ...
Other information: