Skip to content

TPI-006 eval-first monkey model provider metadata pass#5

Draft
gb250e wants to merge 7 commits intoexp/eval-first-005from
exp/eval-first-006
Draft

TPI-006 eval-first monkey model provider metadata pass#5
gb250e wants to merge 7 commits intoexp/eval-first-005from
exp/eval-first-006

Conversation

@gb250e
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

@gb250e gb250e commented Mar 21, 2026

Purpose

This is the TPI-006 internal review PR.

TPI-005 showed that local auth readiness is partially satisfied, but the selected Runpod path still lacks the concrete provider-supplied endpoint metadata needed to attach to the pod from the current workspace. TPI-006 isolates that provider-metadata problem.

Thesis

For the selected Runpod Parameter Golf path, the next highest-value move is to obtain the concrete provider-supplied attach route (pod identifier, host or endpoint, exact command, username, port) that lands in /workspace/parameter-golf, without changing the existing eval-first monkey-model execution contract.

Scope

  • keep the selected Runpod path
  • keep the existing eval-first mechanism unchanged
  • focus only on provider metadata / endpoint discovery
  • preserve public-safe monkey model framing

What is included

  • provider metadata plan
  • endpoint contract template
  • provider checklist
  • metadata decision surface
  • PR summary placeholder for the next update

What is intentionally not included yet

  • new model mechanism
  • tokenizer changes
  • runtime / val_bpb evidence
  • environment reselection

Expected next step

  1. obtain the exact provider-supplied attach or SSH command
  2. obtain the explicit pod identifier / endpoint / username / port
  3. verify landing in /workspace/parameter-golf
  4. resume the TPI-004 evidence pass unchanged

Public-facing safety

This branch uses monkey model framing only and is intended to avoid exposing proprietary architecture language.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

gb250e commented Mar 21, 2026

LLM review checkpoint for TPI-006

Current assessment

  • move_to_failure_ledger is the correct classification.
  • The branch produced stronger negative evidence rather than weaker repetition.
  • The blocker is no longer local auth or generic attachability; it is explicitly missing external provider handoff data.

Why this is the right stopping point

  • Additional local searching is unlikely to produce pod-specific endpoint data.
  • Continuing to spin the same loop without new provider metadata would create noise rather than evidence.
  • The residue is valuable because it sharply defines the exact handoff now required: pod id, host/endpoint, exact attach command, username, and port.

Required next step

Open TPI-007 as an external-handoff intake / execution-resume gate.
That loop should begin only from concrete provider-supplied metadata, then immediately verify landing in /workspace/parameter-golf and resume the TPI-004 execution contract unchanged.

Update note for this PR

The PR body should now emphasize:

  • local auth material exists
  • provider metadata remains absent
  • the blocked state is external, not model-side
  • the next viable move is to ingest real provider handoff data rather than continue local discovery

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants