Skip to content

chore(deps): update dependency bazel to v9.0.1#6077

Merged
longlho merged 1 commit intomainfrom
renovate/bazel-9.x
Mar 15, 2026
Merged

chore(deps): update dependency bazel to v9.0.1#6077
longlho merged 1 commit intomainfrom
renovate/bazel-9.x

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Mar 15, 2026

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Update Change
bazel patch 9.0.09.0.1

Release Notes

bazelbuild/bazel (bazel)

v9.0.1

Compare Source


Release Notes:


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/bazel-9.x branch from af439fb to 262b268 Compare March 15, 2026 16:22
@longlho longlho merged commit e8b1df3 into main Mar 15, 2026
5 of 6 checks passed
@longlho longlho deleted the renovate/bazel-9.x branch March 15, 2026 17:07
longlho added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 17, 2026
## Problem
`.bazeliskrc` has `USE_BAZEL_VERSION=8.1.0` which **overrides**
`.bazelversion` (priority: `.bazeliskrc` > `.bazelversion`). This means
all CI and local builds have been running Bazel 8.1.0 despite
`.bazelversion` being bumped to 9.0.1 in #6077.

This is the root cause of #6135 failing — `aspect_rules_js@3.0.3` uses
`repo_name = None` which requires Bazel >=7.6 but works differently on
8.x vs 9.x.

## Fix
Update `USE_BAZEL_VERSION` in `.bazeliskrc` to `9.0.1` to match
`.bazelversion`.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant