Reverts "Add a platform view test to android_hardware_smoke_test (#187913)"#188051
Merged
gaaclarke merged 1 commit intoJun 16, 2026
Merged
Conversation
)" This reverts commit a08432b.
fluttergithubbot
approved these changes
Jun 15, 2026
Contributor
Author
|
auto label is removed for flutter/flutter/188051, Failed to enqueue flutter/flutter/188051 with HTTP 400: Pull request 2 of 3 required status checks have not succeeded: 1 expected.. |
|
Detected the If you add the The "Merge" button is also unlocked. To bypass presubmits as well as the tree status, press the GitHub "Add to Merge Queue". |
10 tasks
This was referenced Jun 16, 2026
auto-submit Bot
pushed a commit
to flutter/packages
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 16, 2026
flutter/flutter@5827d5f...3a0420c 2026-06-16 Rusino@users.noreply.github.com Implement font fallback (flutter/flutter#187520) 2026-06-16 amhurtado@protonmail.com Add FlatBuffers Verifier checks to Impeller asset loading (flutter/flutter#187878) 2026-06-16 engine-flutter-autoroll@skia.org Roll Packages from aa964a3 to 8286d39 (1 revision) (flutter/flutter#188067) 2026-06-16 engine-flutter-autoroll@skia.org Roll Skia from 9c2b83788409 to d7196b0b4939 (1 revision) (flutter/flutter#188066) 2026-06-16 engine-flutter-autoroll@skia.org Roll Skia from ef17057bb776 to 9c2b83788409 (1 revision) (flutter/flutter#188061) 2026-06-16 engine-flutter-autoroll@skia.org Roll Skia from 500025456bb5 to ef17057bb776 (1 revision) (flutter/flutter#188058) 2026-06-16 engine-flutter-autoroll@skia.org Roll Skia from cb1035ff14bf to 500025456bb5 (5 revisions) (flutter/flutter#188057) 2026-06-16 engine-flutter-autoroll@skia.org Roll Fuchsia Linux SDK from TbB86Po_HDe1dvXvT... to VeLhhlDcod09NR4Hb... (flutter/flutter#188055) 2026-06-16 engine-flutter-autoroll@skia.org Roll Skia from 70acf6a5e7c9 to cb1035ff14bf (3 revisions) (flutter/flutter#188054) 2026-06-16 41930132+hellohuanlin@users.noreply.github.com [pv]skip non-tappable web view workaround on ios 26.4 (flutter/flutter#185424) 2026-06-16 mdebbar@google.com [web] RenderParagraph needs paint after a DPR change (flutter/flutter#186968) 2026-06-16 30870216+gaaclarke@users.noreply.github.com Adds gamma correction to windows text. (flutter/flutter#187871) 2026-06-15 98614782+auto-submit[bot]@users.noreply.github.com Reverts "Add a platform view test to android_hardware_smoke_test (#187913)" (flutter/flutter#188051) 2026-06-15 awolff@google.com Add a platform view test to android_hardware_smoke_test (flutter/flutter#187913) 2026-06-15 codefu@google.com feat: linux_analyze in a workflow (flutter/flutter#187889) 2026-06-15 mdebbar@google.com [web] Changes to WebParagraph configuration (flutter/flutter#187188) 2026-06-15 matt.boetger@gmail.com Fail gracefully on Android AVD lock errors during startup (flutter/flutter#187200) 2026-06-15 bkonyi@google.com [flutter_tools] Fix flakiness in widget_preview_detection_test (flutter/flutter#187938) 2026-06-15 jason-simmons@users.noreply.github.com Exclude fuchsia-sdk/sdk/.build-id from the builder cache archive (flutter/flutter#187826) 2026-06-15 engine-flutter-autoroll@skia.org Roll Skia from c8d9f80f13e4 to 70acf6a5e7c9 (4 revisions) (flutter/flutter#188020) 2026-06-15 engine-flutter-autoroll@skia.org Roll Packages from b78ad83 to aa964a3 (7 revisions) (flutter/flutter#188021) If this roll has caused a breakage, revert this CL and stop the roller using the controls here: https://autoroll.skia.org/r/flutter-packages Please CC bmparr@google.com,stuartmorgan@google.com on the revert to ensure that a human is aware of the problem. To file a bug in Packages: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/new/choose To report a problem with the AutoRoller itself, please file a bug: https://issues.skia.org/issues/new?component=1389291&template=1850622 Documentation for the AutoRoller is here: https://skia.googlesource.com/buildbot/+doc/main/autoroll/README.md
pull Bot
pushed a commit
to TheRakeshPurohit/flutter
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 17, 2026
Expand test coverage to address more of flutter#182123 This adds a test with a platform view. In order to get both the flutter pixels and the native pixels fully composited, we have to initiate the screenshot from the test runner, not the app. This has a few consequences for the architecture and data flow of the tests. Details in the changes to README.md. PR flutter#187913 (for issue flutter#182123) added `image: any` to android_hardware_smoke_test's `pubspec.yaml`, but didn't update the `pubspec.lock` file in the workspace root. This lockfile doesn't currently contain the `image` package, so it broke CI and was reverted in flutter#188051 A package missing from the lockfile seems to cause CI fail in this misleading way. To fix it, we just need to add `image` to the lockfile. ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [AI contribution guidelines] and understand my responsibilities, or I am not using AI tools. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. **Note**: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [AI contribution guidelines]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#ai-contribution-guidelines [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md
LouiseHsu
pushed a commit
to LouiseHsu/flutter
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 18, 2026
Expand test coverage to address more of flutter#182123 This adds a test with a platform view. In order to get both the flutter pixels and the native pixels fully composited, we have to initiate the screenshot from the test runner, not the app. This has a few consequences for the architecture and data flow of the tests. Details in the changes to README.md. PR flutter#187913 (for issue flutter#182123) added `image: any` to android_hardware_smoke_test's `pubspec.yaml`, but didn't update the `pubspec.lock` file in the workspace root. This lockfile doesn't currently contain the `image` package, so it broke CI and was reverted in flutter#188051 A package missing from the lockfile seems to cause CI fail in this misleading way. To fix it, we just need to add `image` to the lockfile. ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [AI contribution guidelines] and understand my responsibilities, or I am not using AI tools. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. **Note**: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [AI contribution guidelines]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#ai-contribution-guidelines [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md
via-guy
pushed a commit
to via-guy/flutter
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 26, 2026
…tter#187913)" (flutter#188051) <!-- start_original_pr_link --> Reverts: flutter#187913 <!-- end_original_pr_link --> <!-- start_initiating_author --> Initiated by: gaaclarke <!-- end_initiating_author --> <!-- start_revert_reason --> Reason for reverting: This is turning the tree red because there is a problem getting pub dependencies after this (for example: https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/flutter/builders/prod/Mac%20tool_integration_tests_2_5/10257/overview). I'm not sure what the solution is off the top of my head, maybe updating the packages for the workspace? Setting the dependency to `any` seems like the right thing to do to me. <!-- end_revert_reason --> <!-- start_original_pr_author --> Original PR Author: andywolff <!-- end_original_pr_author --> <!-- start_reviewers --> Reviewed By: {gaaclarke} <!-- end_reviewers --> <!-- start_revert_body --> This change reverts the following previous change: Expand test coverage to address more of flutter#182123 This adds a test with a platform view. In order to get both the flutter pixels and the native pixels fully composited, we have to initiate the screenshot from the test runner, not the app. This has a few consequences for the architecture and data flow of the tests. Details in the changes to README.md. ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [AI contribution guidelines] and understand my responsibilities, or I am not using AI tools. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [AI contribution guidelines]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#ai-contribution-guidelines [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md <!-- end_revert_body --> Co-authored-by: auto-submit[bot] <flutter-engprod-team@google.com>
via-guy
pushed a commit
to via-guy/flutter
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 26, 2026
Expand test coverage to address more of flutter#182123 This adds a test with a platform view. In order to get both the flutter pixels and the native pixels fully composited, we have to initiate the screenshot from the test runner, not the app. This has a few consequences for the architecture and data flow of the tests. Details in the changes to README.md. PR flutter#187913 (for issue flutter#182123) added `image: any` to android_hardware_smoke_test's `pubspec.yaml`, but didn't update the `pubspec.lock` file in the workspace root. This lockfile doesn't currently contain the `image` package, so it broke CI and was reverted in flutter#188051 A package missing from the lockfile seems to cause CI fail in this misleading way. To fix it, we just need to add `image` to the lockfile. ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [AI contribution guidelines] and understand my responsibilities, or I am not using AI tools. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. **Note**: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [AI contribution guidelines]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#ai-contribution-guidelines [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Reverts: #187913
Initiated by: gaaclarke
Reason for reverting: This is turning the tree red because there is a problem getting pub dependencies after this (for example: https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/flutter/builders/prod/Mac%20tool_integration_tests_2_5/10257/overview).
I'm not sure what the solution is off the top of my head, maybe updating the packages for the workspace? Setting the dependency to
anyseems like the right thing to do to me.Original PR Author: andywolff
Reviewed By: {gaaclarke}
This change reverts the following previous change:
Expand test coverage to address more of #182123
This adds a test with a platform view. In order to get both the flutter pixels and the native pixels fully composited, we have to initiate the screenshot from the test runner, not the app. This has a few consequences for the architecture and data flow of the tests. Details in the changes to README.md.
Pre-launch Checklist
///).If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on Discord.