Skip to content

bench batch decode#3

Merged
yzh119 merged 1 commit intoflashinfer-ai:mainfrom
abcdabcd987:bench_batch_decode
Sep 18, 2023
Merged

bench batch decode#3
yzh119 merged 1 commit intoflashinfer-ai:mainfrom
abcdabcd987:bench_batch_decode

Conversation

@abcdabcd987
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@yzh119 yzh119 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thank you!

@yzh119 yzh119 merged commit 212e056 into flashinfer-ai:main Sep 18, 2023
diptorupd referenced this pull request in ROCm/flashinfer Sep 29, 2025
This PR fixes some of the unit test failures that occur in Single
Decode. It also disables clang formatting of headers.
The clang format of headers causes compilation issues. The compiler is
unable to find `HIP WARP SYNC INTRINSICS` causing failures. Disabling
clang format fixes these issues

```
    Start 1: MathTest
1/6 Test #1: MathTest .........................   Passed    3.31 sec
    Start 2: PosEncTest
2/6 Test #2: PosEncTest .......................   Passed    3.36 sec
    Start 3: CascadeTest
3/6 Test #3: CascadeTest ......................   Passed    3.35 sec
    Start 4: PageTest
4/6 Test #4: PageTest .........................   Passed  114.08 sec
    Start 5: SingleDecodeTest
5/6 Test #5: SingleDecodeTest .................   Passed   35.22 sec
    Start 6: BatchDecodeTest
6/6 Test #6: BatchDecodeTest ..................   Passed  559.75 sec

100% tests passed, 0 tests failed out of 6

Total Test time (real) = 719.07 sec
```
diptorupd referenced this pull request in ROCm/flashinfer Sep 29, 2025
CPP test suite was using `hipified` headers. In this PR, we port over unit tests to use `gpu_iface`. This is necessary for us as the next step is to move the build infrastructure to use `gpu_iface`

This PR has been tested locally 
```
Test project /root/flashinfer/libflashinfer/tests/hip/build
    Start 1: MathTest
1/6 Test #1: MathTest .........................   Passed    3.40 sec
    Start 2: PosEncTest
2/6 Test #2: PosEncTest .......................   Passed    3.40 sec
    Start 3: CascadeTest
3/6 Test #3: CascadeTest ......................   Passed  985.27 sec
    Start 4: PageTest
4/6 Test #4: PageTest .........................   Passed  112.40 sec
    Start 5: SingleDecodeTest
5/6 Test #5: SingleDecodeTest .................   Passed   35.46 sec
    Start 6: BatchDecodeTest
6/6 Test #6: BatchDecodeTest ..................   Passed  556.81 sec

100% tests passed, 0 tests failed out of 6
```

To replicate the tests
```
cd flashinfer/libflashinfer/tests/hip
```
```
mkdir build && cd build/
```
```
cmake -DCMAKE_PREFIX_PATH=/root/libtorch -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER:PATH=/opt/rocm/bin/amdclang++ -DFLASHINFER_INCLUDE_DIRS=/root/flashinfer/libflashinfer/include/ ..
```
```
make
```
```
ctest
```
diptorupd referenced this pull request in ROCm/flashinfer Sep 29, 2025
In this PR I remove the `libtorch` dependency and removed
`test_page.cpp`. `test_page.cpp` is the only unit test that uses
libtorch. However, we also have a pytest for testing page. We will use
that for validation.

Removing the libtorch dependency will help us speed docker builds and
remove additional dependencies.


```Test project /root/flashinfer/libflashinfer/tests/hip/build
    Start 1: MathTest
1/8 Test #1: MathTest ............................   Passed    0.31 sec
    Start 2: PosEncTest
2/8 Test #2: PosEncTest ..........................   Passed    0.31 sec
    Start 3: CascadeTest
3/8 Test #3: CascadeTest .........................   Passed  1369.12 sec
    Start 4: SingleDecodeTest
4/8 Test #4: SingleDecodeTest ....................   Passed  7726.35 sec
    Start 5: BatchDecodeTest
5/8 Test #5: BatchDecodeTest .....................   Passed  811.61 sec
    Start 6: test_mfma_fp32_16x16x16fp16
6/8 Test #6: test_mfma_fp32_16x16x16fp16 .........   Passed    0.30 sec
    Start 7: test_transpose_4x4_half_registers
7/8 Test #7: test_transpose_4x4_half_registers ...   Passed    0.28 sec
    Start 8: test_rowsum
8/8 Test #8: test_rowsum .........................   Passed    0.27 sec

100% tests passed, 0 tests failed out of 8
```
blake-snc pushed a commit to blake-snc/flashinfer that referenced this pull request Feb 20, 2026
Refactor test_trtllm_fmha_v2_prefill.
yzh119 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 25, 2026
<!-- .github/pull_request_template.md -->

## 📌 Description

To fix the following bug:
When the CuteDSL MoE kernels were ported from TensorRT-LLM to
FlashInfer, the mPtrPermutedIdxToExpandedIdx field was accidentally
dropped from the routing kernel's DataBase struct in RoutingKernel.h.
TRT-LLM's routing kernel produces three reverse-mapping outputs:

1. mPtrExpandedIdxToPermutedIdx[expandedIdx] = permutedIdx — forward
mapping
2. mPtrPermutedIdxToExpandedIdx[permutedIdx] = expandedIdx — reverse to
expanded index (token_idx * topk + k)
3. mPtrPermutedIdxToTokenIdx[permutedIdx] = tokenIdx — reverse to token
index only

FlashInfer's port kept only #1 and #3, dropping #2. The binding in
moe_utils_binding.cu then had to wire the Python buffer
permuted_idx_to_expanded_idx to the only available reverse-mapping field
— mPtrPermutedIdxToTokenIdx — which writes plain tokenIdx instead of
expandedIdx.
The Impact
The CuteDSL kernels (GEMM1 gather, moe_output_memset, GEMM2 finalize)
all expect expanded indices and derive the token index via expanded_idx
// topk. When they received plain tokenIdx instead, they computed
tokenIdx // topk — yielding the wrong A row for gather, wrong zero-init
for memset, and wrong scatter position + wrong routing scale for
finalize.

<!-- What does this PR do? Briefly describe the changes and why they’re
needed. -->

## 🔍 Related Issues

<!-- Link any related issues here -->

## 🚀 Pull Request Checklist

Thank you for contributing to FlashInfer! Before we review your pull
request, please make sure the following items are complete.

### ✅ Pre-commit Checks

- [ ] I have installed `pre-commit` by running `pip install pre-commit`
(or used your preferred method).
- [ ] I have installed the hooks with `pre-commit install`.
- [ ] I have run the hooks manually with `pre-commit run --all-files`
and fixed any reported issues.

> If you are unsure about how to set up `pre-commit`, see [the
pre-commit documentation](https://pre-commit.com/).

## 🧪 Tests

- [ ] Tests have been added or updated as needed.
- [ ] All tests are passing (`unittest`, etc.).

## Reviewer Notes

<!-- Optional: anything you'd like reviewers to focus on, concerns, etc.
-->


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **Refactor**
* Refined MOE (Mixture of Experts) routing infrastructure by extending
index mapping capabilities across multiple kernel implementations to
improve internal data flow consistency.

* **Tests**
* Strengthened accuracy validation thresholds from 0.925 to 0.97 with
adjusted error tolerance parameters, ensuring more rigorous testing of
MOE operations under FP4 quantization conditions.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
leejnau added a commit to leejnau/flashinfer that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2026
…pect

Walks every non-whitespace hunk across all 4 direct_port kernel files
(utils.py, custom_pipeline.py, blockscaled_contiguous_grouped_gemm_
finalize_fusion.py, blockscaled_contiguous_gather_grouped_gemm_swiglu_
fusion.py) between TRT-LLM v1.3.0rc5.post2 (the user's NGC container
version) and flashinfer's port. 159 hunks classified total. No
functional kernel-logic divergence found; all substantive differences
fall into a small number of categorized buckets (cosmetic line-wrapping,
pdl env-var adaptation, cutlass version shims, lint suppressions).

Primary finding — a highly plausible alternative suspect for flashinfer-ai#3067,
narrower than the prior Candidate Root Causes list:

The MbarrierArray shim in custom_pipeline.py (3 occurrences). Flashinfer
replaces PipelineAsync._make_sync_object(..., TCGen05Mma) with direct
MbarrierArray(...) construction, unconditionally. Comment claims
_make_sync_object "does not handle TCGen05Mma in cutlass >= 4.4.0", but
TRT-LLM (pinned to cutlass 4.3.4) keeps using _make_sync_object and our
test_nvfp4_gather_grouped_gemm_swiglu_blackwell[tile_size=256] runs
prove it works at that cutlass version. If the two paths produce
mbarriers with even subtly different transaction-count / arrive-count
semantics, the 2CTA synchronization protocol (more elaborate than 1CTA)
would be affected exactly the way the flashinfer-ai#3067 reproduction shows: pass
at tile_size=128 (1CTA), fail at tile_size=256 (2CTA) at a consistent
fraction of output rows (94.78% within tolerance).

Secondary finding:

The cute.arch.fence_proxy enum -> string conversion (~20 occurrences
across both GEMM kernels). Benign iff cutlass accepts both forms
interchangeably; worth a spot-check.

What the deep audit ruled out:

- Kernel bodies in both GEMM1 (gather+SwiGLU) and GEMM2 (finalize)
  are semantically identical between TRT-LLM and flashinfer. All
  2CTA-specific code paths (use_2cta_instrs, sync_transform_warp_id,
  SharedStorage1cta/2cta, cta_group, overlapping_accum, etc.) match.
- The cutlass-version shims for monkey-patches and nvvm.fmin are
  correctly version-gated and degenerate to TRT-LLM's exact behavior
  on cutlass 4.3.4 (the user's runtime).
- PDL env-var adaptation uses default-True matching TRT-LLM's default.
- moe_utils.py (the former flashinfer-ai#1 suspect) drops to flashinfer-ai#2 in the refined
  list; MbarrierArray shim is now flashinfer-ai#1.

Artifacts added:

- benchmarks/cute_dsl_moe_port_deep_audit_log.md (344 lines): full
  per-hunk classification log with bucket vocabulary, suspicion
  analysis for MbarrierArray, and reproduction instructions.

Artifacts updated:

- benchmarks/cute_dsl_moe_port_audit.md: header-date line notes the
  deep audit; Executive verdict updated with the new primary suspect;
  Candidate Root Causes list reordered (MbarrierArray shim -> flashinfer-ai#1,
  moe_utils.py -> flashinfer-ai#2, fence_proxy enum->string -> flashinfer-ai#3) with per-item
  "how to check" instructions; "What the deep audit ruled out"
  subsection added; Suggested next investigative steps reordered with
  a concrete MbarrierArray bypass experiment as the first step.

No runtime work in this commit; purely static source review. The
MbarrierArray hypothesis is now actionable: a ~3-line source edit in
custom_pipeline.py + a pytest rerun should confirm or rule it out.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
leejnau added a commit to leejnau/flashinfer that referenced this pull request Apr 24, 2026
Code-reading review 2026-04-24: `convert_sf_to_mma_layout` is a pure
`.view(...).permute(...)` strided view — it does not move data; the
underlying GPU bytes ARE the input SF bytes. The kernel reads via
`data_ptr()` + stride metadata, getting the same bytes TRT-LLM's
kernel reads. TRT-LLM's `swizzle_sf(unswizzle_sf(sf, ...))` is a
round-trip empirically verified byte-identical to the input SF.
Both paths hand the CuteDSL kernel the same bytes.

Also: the 6D layout (32, 4, m//128, 4, k//4, num_groups) uses M=128
as fundamental sub-tile REGARDLESS of tile_size. The 2CTA variant
at tile_size=256 reads 2 adjacent m_tiles across two CTAs; the SF
byte layout doesn't change. The mechanism originally proposed for
this candidate (tile_size-dependent SF layout mismatch) was based
on a misreading of the layout.

Kept the abandoned sf_layout_diff_test.py attempt as a record —
its .contiguous()-on-strided-view comparison produced a false
88.72 percent divergence report that was a test-harness artifact,
not a real finding. The corrected interpretation supersedes that
test's nominal verdict.

Working suspicion now moves to moe_permute (JIT-compiled sibling
of moe_sort in moe_utils.py) — consumes moe_sort's now-verified
output, explicitly tile_size-parameterized, and has not been
isolated by any prior probe.

Candidates ruled out so far:
 - kernel bodies (deep audit)
 - flashinfer-ai#1 MbarrierArray shim (2026-04-23 revert experiment)
 - flashinfer-ai#2 moe_sort / routing tables (2026-04-24 self-consistency)
 - flashinfer-ai#4 SF layout conversion (2026-04-24 code reading)

Candidates still open: flashinfer-ai#3 fence_proxy shim (low prior), flashinfer-ai#5
orchestration / buffer sizing, flashinfer-ai#6 top-level wrappers. moe_permute
now promoted to primary suspect (wasn't cleanly separated in the
original flashinfer-ai#2 entry; test script in progress).
leejnau added a commit to leejnau/flashinfer that referenced this pull request Apr 24, 2026
…lu gap at tile_size=256

Now that correctness at tile_size=256 is established (previous commit
reclassifies flashinfer-ai#3067 as test artifact), the real open work item is the
perf gap that the audit had mis-attributed to the correctness bug.

2026-04-24 experiment, forced tile_size=256 on flashinfer via
tuner.py patch (for tile_size in [256]):
  fi gemm1_swiglu at N=16384, tile=256: 2.644 ms
  trt gemm1_swiglu at N=16384, tile=256: 1.806 ms
  +46.4 percent at the SAME tactic

At tile=128, flashinfer's gemm1 was 2.711 ms — so enabling tile=256
barely helps flashinfer, while TRT-LLM at the same tile=256 tactic
gets much more throughput. The large-batch +27 percent top-line
regression is NOT resolved by un-gating tile_size=256.

Both sides compile the identical CuteDSL kernel source (deep audit
established semantic identity of kernel bodies). So the SASS or
runtime differs despite identical Python source. Working hypotheses:

 - 8a. Compile-time parameter / constexpr drift between wrappers'
   invocations causes different SASS
 - 8b. Launch-grid / cluster config mis-set on flashinfer (2CTA
   effectively running as 1CTA)
 - 8c. Input buffer alignment / stride differences the kernel
   optimizer exploits
 - 8d. Stream / cooperative-group sync context difference

Suggested first probe: nsys trace at N=16384 for both sides at
tile_size=256, compare launch config + SASS identifier + span
alignment. Should quickly narrow 8a vs 8b vs 8d.

Note on prior follow-up flashinfer-ai#1: this supersedes its framing. "MbarrierArray
shim / tile_gating causes the regression" is now invalidated by the
forced-tile=256 experiment showing un-gating does not recover the
regression. The rest of flashinfer-ai#3067-era candidates (flashinfer-ai#3 fence_proxy, flashinfer-ai#5
orchestration, flashinfer-ai#6 top-level wrappers) were framed around a
correctness bug that doesn't exist and are now subordinate.
Follow-up flashinfer-ai#8 replaces them as the primary perf work item.
leejnau added a commit to leejnau/flashinfer that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2026
…ground-truth verification

A single nsys trace at N=8192 with `--nsys-capture-range` (commit
40bb77e) bracketing only the timed measurement passes resolved
both remaining measurement-related follow-ups.

flashinfer-ai#4 (`bench_gpu_time_with_cupti(use_cuda_graph=True)` 2× inflation):
direct wall-clock comparison at N=16384 / 30 iters shows identical
wall-clocks with and without `--use-cupti` (1m12.5s vs 1m9.5s; the
3 s delta is autotune-compile + Python-startup variance, well below
the ~240 ms of actual GPU measurement work in 70+ s of total
wall-clock). The historical 2× signature was always a `cupti-python`
span-attribution artifact, never real GPU work — and it does not
reproduce under current methodology. A smaller asymmetric bias
(~13% under-report on `trt_ms` vs ~5% on `fi_ms`) persists, which
is the rationale for keeping `--use-cupti` opt-in (default off).

flashinfer-ai#6 (in-bench vs standalone 19% gap on trt `gemm2_finalize`): nsys
ground truth at N=8192 = 0.737 ms; current in-bench reports
0.7465 ms (1.3% delta — within noise); standalone reports 0.685 ms
(7.1% below ground truth, harness-to-harness rounding tolerance).
The original 19% gap was specific to the older `--use-cupti` config
against the standalone — under current methodology there is no
systematic bias.

Audit changes:

- New "Ground-truth nsys verification (2026-04-28)" section
  immediately after the post-fix verification, documenting the run
  command, per-kernel ground truth, the resolution of both
  follow-ups with quantitative tables, and a note that the trace
  also serves as a third independent kernel-port faithfulness
  check (kernel mangled-name structure matches modulo encoded
  module path).

- Follow-up flashinfer-ai#1 marked RESOLVED (the original `MbarrierArray`
  framing was wrong; actual cause was the gemm2-enumeration gap
  fixed at d291d17e/f0cf8cd0 on the standalone PR branch).

- Follow-ups flashinfer-ai#4 and flashinfer-ai#6 entries replaced with closure notes.

- Top-of-file correction section title updated to "2026-04-24/25/28"
  and short summary expanded to mention the verification round.

The original "open mysteries" list (flashinfer-ai#1, flashinfer-ai#4, flashinfer-ai#6, flashinfer-ai#8) is now fully
closed. Items remaining in *Follow-ups queued* (flashinfer-ai#2, flashinfer-ai#3, flashinfer-ai#5, flashinfer-ai#7) are
all scope-expansions, not investigations.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
leejnau added a commit to leejnau/flashinfer that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2026
…red-and-skipped

After 2026-04-24 / 25 / 28 we have five independent fi-vs-trt
agreement proofs:
  1. source byte-identical with rc5.post2 (deep audit)
  2. compiled PTX byte-identical at tile_size=256 (md5 401ebca6...)
  3. per-call timing match within 0.1% at apples-to-apples tactic
  4. 45 (size, EP) parity cells all pass within 0.5 FP4 step
  5. nsys ground-truth verification with kernel mangled-name
     structure agreement

The probability of fi+trt being wrong-but-agreeing across all five
is essentially zero, so a PyTorch FP4 third-reference check no
longer provides meaningful incremental confidence.

Additionally, `compute_reference_moe_fp4` has known limitations:
its PyTorch-eager FP4 simulation is stricter than the kernel's
actual FP4 representation, which made it ambiguous to interpret
during the original flashinfer-ai#3067 framing. Disagreement between bench
output and the reference would not unambiguously indicate a kernel
bug.

Cost is also non-trivial: Python-eager per-token / per-expert
loops would require running at a small problem-size subset to
keep wall-clock bearable.

Cost-to-incremental-confidence ratio is bad enough that this
follow-up is consciously skipped, not deferred. Future evidence
of a fi-vs-trt agreement that's actually wrong would re-elevate
it; otherwise no value.

Effective remaining open follow-ups: flashinfer-ai#3 (production-convention
scaling), flashinfer-ai#5 (cutlass-dsl 4.4.2 sanity rerun), flashinfer-ai#9 (EP=16 tactic-
divergence root cause).
leejnau added a commit to leejnau/flashinfer that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2026
…d-and-skipped

flashinfer-ai#3 is a real coverage gap (at gs=1.0 the scale-conversion code paths
run with degenerate values, so a divergent FP8_MAX or scale-convention
mismatch between the two sides would silently produce identical
output here and divergent output at non-trivial scales). Skipped
because:

- Both sides have their own internal scale-plumbing tests with
  non-trivial scales. TRT-LLM's
  tests/unittest/_torch/thop/parallel/test_cute_dsl_moe.py and
  flashinfer's tests/moe/test_cute_dsl_fused_moe.py both exercise
  non-trivial-gs configurations against PyTorch references. The
  bench wouldn't add coverage their CI doesn't already have.

- A failure here wouldn't tell us what we want to know. The most
  likely cause of fi-vs-trt parity divergence at production scales
  would be a scale-convention disagreement BETWEEN the two
  implementations — not fixable in flashinfer (TRT-LLM is upstream),
  and dramatically out of scope.

- Risk of getting nerd-sniped on bench-side mistakes. Scale plumbing
  has many surfaces (alpha, weight_scale_2, input_scale, is_sf_*
  flags, fp4_quantize signatures); any tiny bench-side mismatch
  produces a parity failure that looks like a port bug. That's the
  same failure pattern as flashinfer-ai#4 / flashinfer-ai#6 / flashinfer-ai#8 from earlier in the audit.

Scope-difference note: the audit's load-bearing question is "is the
kernel port faithful?" — closed via byte-identical PTX + matching
timing + 45 parity cells. flashinfer-ai#3 is about "do flashinfer and TRT-LLM
agree on NVFP4 scaling conventions?" — a separate question, real
but tangential to port-faithfulness.

One scenario that would re-elevate this: a planned production ship
of CuteDslMoEWrapper to a caller using non-trivial scales, where
the team wants one independent cross-check (against CuteDslFusedMoE
under the same scales) before merging. In that scenario flashinfer-ai#3 is
exactly the right pre-ship sanity. For closing out the investigation
audit, it's tangential.

Effective remaining open follow-ups: flashinfer-ai#5 (cutlass-dsl 4.4.2 sanity
rerun) and flashinfer-ai#9 (EP=16 tactic-divergence root cause).
leejnau added a commit to leejnau/flashinfer that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2026
…flashinfer-ai#9 remains

Three close-out edits to wrap the CuteDSL MoE FP4 port audit:

- Mark flashinfer-ai#5 (cutlass-dsl 4.4.2 sanity rerun) considered-and-skipped,
  matching the closure pattern used for flashinfer-ai#2 and flashinfer-ai#3. Three reasons:
  (a) port-parity claims are unaffected by DSL-compiler version since
  both sides use the same in-container compiler, (b) flashinfer and
  TRT-LLM each have CI testing 4.4.2 already, (c) install hassle plus
  unsupported-config risk produces the same ambiguous-failure pattern
  that cost time on flashinfer-ai#4/flashinfer-ai#6/flashinfer-ai#8. Auto-resolves whenever NGC bumps the
  image. Install recipe preserved for future absolute-latency probes.

- Add a "Version-skew caveat (2026-04-28)" subsection to the
  top-of-file correction. The bench compares flashinfer-with-post-rc5-
  forward-ports (bb2f88329, 6b8ae6fa8, fae498579) vs TRT-LLM-rc5.post2-
  without-them, so the +3.5% / +4.1% headlines at EP=1 N=16384 may
  partly reflect the version asymmetry. Load-bearing claims (port
  faithfulness via byte-identical source + PTX, 45/45 parity, flashinfer-ai#3067
  fix) are unaffected because they do not depend on absolute deltas.
  Naturally re-baselines when NGC publishes a 1.3.x.x image absorbing
  the post-rc5 commits.

- Update the "Open follow-ups remaining" summary: flashinfer-ai#5 added to the
  considered-and-skipped list alongside flashinfer-ai#2/flashinfer-ai#3, leaving flashinfer-ai#9 (EP=16
  tactic-divergence root cause) as the only effective open follow-up.
  Audit declared closed 2026-04-28.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
leejnau added a commit to leejnau/flashinfer that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2026
…-stream memset overlap

Per-forward kernel chains table (line 4171) had row flashinfer-ai#3 wrong about fi
running `moe_output.zero_()` "on main stream". Reading the actual code
at `flashinfer/fused_moe/cute_dsl/fused_moe.py:230-274` shows fi
schedules the dense `zero_()` on the wrapper's aux stream with explicit
`main_event` / `memset_event` gating when `use_async_memset=True` (the
default). So both fi and trt overlap memset with GEMM1 via the aux
stream — the actual difference is dense full-slice zero (fi) vs sparse
per-expert memset (trt), and the kernel selection rationale (fi
bypasses the sparse kernel because their port invokes it incorrectly
when `!enable_alltoall || ep_size <= top_k`). Updated row flashinfer-ai#3 to
"**Partial**" instead of "**No** — intentionally different" with the
corrected mechanism explanation.

Implication: any wrapper-overhead budget that included the aux-stream
memset overlap as an unrealized opportunity should drop that line —
it's already accounted for. Audit's load-bearing perf-residual
analyses (~+1-4% Δ% at EP=1 N=16384) are unchanged because they were
measured directly, not derived from a sum of components.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants