Closed
Conversation
Makes the provider readme specify that this is an optional way to access the OVM, so that devs don't get confused.
Collaborator
Author
|
closing, this accidentally duplicated #367 |
snario
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 14, 2021
Co-authored-by: Maurelian <maurelian@protonmail.ch>
protolambda
added a commit
to protolambda/optimism
that referenced
this pull request
May 1, 2022
P2P block distribution
bap2pecs
pushed a commit
to babylonlabs-io/optimism
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 31, 2024
theochap
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 10, 2025
theochap
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 15, 2026
### Description The provider crate only contains op specific types that don't extend or relate to ethereum types. This PR removes `op-alloy-provider` since `maili-provider` can be used in place.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Makes the provider readme specify that this is an optional way to access the OVM, so that devs don't get confused.
Questions
Does this look right?
Contributing Agreement