Skip to content

op-bindings: Provide common.Address types of predeploys#2797

Merged
mergify[bot] merged 3 commits intodevelopfrom
jg/predeploys
Jun 16, 2022
Merged

op-bindings: Provide common.Address types of predeploys#2797
mergify[bot] merged 3 commits intodevelopfrom
jg/predeploys

Conversation

@trianglesphere
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description
We provide both a string literal which contains the address as const
a hex string and as the type common.Address.

We typically use addresses in the common.Address type so this avoids
users having to do the conversion manually.

We provide both a string literal which contains the address as const
a hex string and as the type common.Address.

We typically use addresses in the common.Address type so this avoids
users having to do the conversion manually.
@changeset-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

changeset-bot bot commented Jun 16, 2022

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 93791b6

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@mergify
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

mergify bot commented Jun 16, 2022

This PR changes implementation code, but doesn't include a changeset. Did you forget to add one?

@trianglesphere trianglesphere changed the title Jg/predeploys op-bindings: Provide common.Address types of predeploys Jun 16, 2022
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@protolambda protolambda left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@mergify
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

mergify bot commented Jun 16, 2022

This PR has been added to the merge queue, and will be merged soon.

@mergify
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

mergify bot commented Jun 16, 2022

This PR is next in line to be merged, and will be merged as soon as checks pass.

@mergify mergify bot merged commit 88bb687 into develop Jun 16, 2022
@mergify mergify bot deleted the jg/predeploys branch June 16, 2022 17:11
@mergify mergify bot removed the on-merge-train label Jun 16, 2022
tuxcanfly pushed a commit to tuxcanfly/optimism that referenced this pull request Jun 16, 2022
…imism#2797)

* op-bindings: Provide common.Address types of predeploys

We provide both a string literal which contains the address as const
a hex string and as the type common.Address.

We typically use addresses in the common.Address type so this avoids
users having to do the conversion manually.

* Use new predeploy address types

Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@mslipper mslipper mentioned this pull request Jun 18, 2022
theochap added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 10, 2025
The function returns a deserialized RollupConfig struct, not a string as
the comment incorrectly stated. Updated comment to accurately reflect
the actual return type.

---------

Co-authored-by: Emilia Hane <elsaemiliaevahane@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: theo <80177219+theochap@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants