Skip to content

op-node/p2p: ensure all topics are added to the topic scoring map#15314

Merged
geoknee merged 4 commits intodevelopfrom
gk/15297
Apr 11, 2025
Merged

op-node/p2p: ensure all topics are added to the topic scoring map#15314
geoknee merged 4 commits intodevelopfrom
gk/15297

Conversation

@geoknee
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@geoknee geoknee commented Apr 9, 2025

Closes #15297

@geoknee geoknee requested review from a team as code owners April 9, 2025 16:14
@geoknee geoknee requested a review from smartcontracts April 9, 2025 16:14
@geoknee geoknee requested a review from protolambda April 9, 2025 16:15
@geoknee geoknee requested a review from refcell April 9, 2025 16:16
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Apr 9, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 86.89%. Comparing base (7b203ac) to head (39299e8).
Report is 21 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##           develop   #15314       +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage    46.32%   86.89%   +40.56%     
============================================
  Files         1227      117     -1110     
  Lines       102944     6081    -96863     
============================================
- Hits         47691     5284    -42407     
+ Misses       51892      771    -51121     
+ Partials      3361       26     -3335     
Flag Coverage Δ
cannon-go-tests-32 ?
cannon-go-tests-64 ?
contracts-bedrock-tests 94.35% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 1112 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@refcell refcell left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks the desired logic to me. Topic score params can be tuned on a per-topic basis as needed in the future. 👍

@geoknee geoknee added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 11, 2025
@geoknee geoknee removed this pull request from the merge queue due to a manual request Apr 11, 2025
@geoknee geoknee added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 11, 2025
Merged via the queue into develop with commit 9a92fed Apr 11, 2025
51 checks passed
@geoknee geoknee deleted the gk/15297 branch April 11, 2025 15:40
ClaytonNorthey92 pushed a commit to hemilabs/optimism that referenced this pull request May 13, 2025
…hereum-optimism#15314)

* introduce allBlocksTopics helper

* modify test to assert all block topics are present

currently failing

* add all block topics to map

* spacing
iquidus pushed a commit to Layr-Labs/optimism that referenced this pull request Jul 24, 2025
…hereum-optimism#15314)

* introduce allBlocksTopics helper

* modify test to assert all block topics are present

currently failing

* add all block topics to map

* spacing
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

op-node/p2p: ensure all block topics are configured in the topic score param map

3 participants