Skip to content

Mute lint-commits job on default branch#1665

Merged
SamWilsn merged 1 commit into
ethereum:forks/osakafrom
SamWilsn:mute-lint-commits
Oct 23, 2025
Merged

Mute lint-commits job on default branch#1665
SamWilsn merged 1 commit into
ethereum:forks/osakafrom
SamWilsn:mute-lint-commits

Conversation

@SamWilsn

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🗒️ Description

If lint-commits runs on the default branch, it breaks and adds a red "X" to our commit history. That's ugly and unnecessary.

Cute Animal Picture

Put a link to a cute animal picture inside the parenthesis-->

@SamWilsn SamWilsn force-pushed the mute-lint-commits branch 3 times, most recently from 5ca59b2 to e959abb Compare October 23, 2025 19:28
@SamWilsn SamWilsn marked this pull request as ready for review October 23, 2025 19:36
@SamWilsn SamWilsn merged commit 21331e1 into ethereum:forks/osaka Oct 23, 2025
11 checks passed
@SamWilsn SamWilsn deleted the mute-lint-commits branch October 23, 2025 20:37
@codecov-commenter

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ Please install the 'codecov app svg image' to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 86.07%. Comparing base (da0c26e) to head (2570bd2).
⚠️ Report is 4 commits behind head on forks/osaka.
❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##           forks/osaka    #1665      +/-   ##
===============================================
- Coverage        86.08%   86.07%   -0.02%     
===============================================
  Files              743      743              
  Lines            44072    44078       +6     
  Branches          3891     3894       +3     
===============================================
  Hits             37938    37938              
- Misses            5656     5659       +3     
- Partials           478      481       +3     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 86.07% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

chetna-mittal pushed a commit to gnosischain/execution-specs that referenced this pull request Oct 24, 2025
Co-authored-by: danceratopz <danceratopz@gmail.com>
chetna-mittal pushed a commit to gnosischain/execution-specs that referenced this pull request Oct 24, 2025
Co-authored-by: danceratopz <danceratopz@gmail.com>
chetna-mittal pushed a commit to gnosischain/execution-specs that referenced this pull request Oct 24, 2025
Co-authored-by: danceratopz <danceratopz@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants