Update EIP-7892: Add blob count per tx limit via blobSchedule#9623
Merged
eth-bot merged 10 commits intoethereum:masterfrom Jun 11, 2025
Merged
Update EIP-7892: Add blob count per tx limit via blobSchedule#9623eth-bot merged 10 commits intoethereum:masterfrom
eth-bot merged 10 commits intoethereum:masterfrom
Conversation
Collaborator
|
✅ All reviewers have approved. |
7db1d8f to
cc90fe0
Compare
cc90fe0 to
adb4efd
Compare
31 tasks
This was referenced Apr 28, 2025
LukaszRozmej
approved these changes
Jun 5, 2025
Co-authored-by: Marius van der Wijden <m.vanderwijden@live.de>
macfarla
reviewed
Jun 9, 2025
Contributor
macfarla
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
field name in comment should match the json example
This was referenced Jun 9, 2025
klkvr
approved these changes
Jun 10, 2025
mattsse
approved these changes
Jun 10, 2025
Member
|
I suggest we target these changes for 7892 instead of 7594 |
Marchhill
suggested changes
Jun 11, 2025
6bc54a6 to
a7503b3
Compare
Marchhill
suggested changes
Jun 11, 2025
Co-authored-by: Marc <Marchhill@users.noreply.github.com>
Marchhill
approved these changes
Jun 11, 2025
Co-authored-by: Barnabas Busa <barnabas.busa@ethereum.org>
Member
We probably should tbh. And it probably should be part of the spec too. |
barnabasbusa
added a commit
to ethpandaops/ethereum-genesis-generator
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 11, 2025
eth-bot
approved these changes
Jun 11, 2025
Collaborator
eth-bot
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
All Reviewers Have Approved; Performing Automatic Merge...
node-seeker574
added a commit
to node-seeker574/ethereum-genesis-generator
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 29, 2025
cosmic-ranger65yu
added a commit
to cosmic-ranger65yu/ethereum-genesis-generator
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 29, 2025
contract-form
added a commit
to contract-form/ethereum-genesis-generator
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 6, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds blob count per tx limit via blobSchedule
Let's assume 72blob txs are allowed, in such case maximum tx size exceeds 10MiB.
It does not seem like there is an obvious point of failure, especially if we spend more time on tx pool improvements. But in sum it effects confidence in ability to handle extreme load of such big transactions.
In case if the proposal is relevant, there are some ideas what can be the initial limit for 48/72 case:
Can it be like 12-15?