Merged
Conversation
Collaborator
|
✅ All reviewers have approved. |
eth-bot
approved these changes
Oct 8, 2024
Collaborator
eth-bot
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
All Reviewers Have Approved; Performing Automatic Merge...
This was referenced Oct 10, 2024
12 tasks
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
rebased copy of #8905, didn't have write access to the branch
repost:
It is important to not allow
authorization.nonce == 2**64 - 1, because in this case incrementing authority nonce will result in nonce overflowing 64 bit, which is not allowed since EIP-2681Alternative to adding this to the transaction validity rules could be additional check during delegation setting, but it is simpler this way (fewer checks) and more aligned with existing transaction types validity.It is checked at authorization list processing now.