Skip to content

docs: replace 'prune modes' with 'pruning modes' (grammatical fix)#21689

Merged
bloxster merged 24 commits into
release/3.5from
docs/pruning-modes-rename-20260609
Jun 10, 2026
Merged

docs: replace 'prune modes' with 'pruning modes' (grammatical fix)#21689
bloxster merged 24 commits into
release/3.5from
docs/pruning-modes-rename-20260609

Conversation

@bloxster

@bloxster bloxster commented Jun 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Grammatical fix: "pruning modes" is more correct than "prune modes".

Applied across all existing documentation files. New documentation pages already use the correct term.

Also renames prune-modes.mdpruning-modes.md and updates all internal links to match.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@yperbasis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The docs-site / build and ci-gate checks are failing here, and the cause is fixable: this PR renames prune-modes.mdpruning-modes.md but leaves 6 inbound links still pointing at the old prune-modes slug. Since the docs site uses onBrokenLinks: 'throw', the build aborts. The build log lists exactly these pages:

  • docs/site/docs/fundamentals/basic-usage.mdx[prune mode](prune-modes)
  • docs/site/docs/get-started/easy-nodes/how-to-run-a-gnosis-chain-node/index.md[Prune Mode](/fundamentals/prune-modes)
  • docs/site/docs/get-started/easy-nodes/how-to-run-a-polygon-node.md[Prune Mode](../../fundamentals/prune-modes)
  • docs/site/docs/get-started/easy-nodes/how-to-run-an-ethereum-node/index.md[Prune Mode](/fundamentals/prune-modes)
  • docs/site/docs/get-started/hardware-requirements.mdx[prune mode](../fundamentals/prune-modes)
  • docs/site/docs/get-started/installation/index.mdx[Prune Mode](/fundamentals/prune-modes)

The equivalent main PR (#21690) updates all of these (plus the same prune modepruning mode text), which is why its build is green. Porting those 6 files over here should fix the broken build.

One minor extra gap: in docs/site/versioned_docs/version-v3.3/fundamentals/sync-modes.md, #21690 changes both the prose line and the **Prune Mode** table header, whereas this PR only changes one of the two — worth matching for consistency (cosmetic only, no link involved).

Bloxster and others added 2 commits June 9, 2026 13:45
The page was renamed prune-modes -> pruning-modes, but six pages still linked
to the old /fundamentals/prune-modes slug, failing the Docusaurus build
(onBrokenLinks: throw). Update those links (text + slug) to match the rename,
mirroring the equivalent fix already in the main-targeted PR #21690. Regenerate
llms-full.txt for the changed link text.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Brings this release/3.5 PR in line with the main-targeted #21690: sweeps the table headers, intro prose, docker-compose comments, FAQ item 3, and the best-practices link text the earlier commits missed, and regenerates llms-full.txt to match.
bloxster pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 9, 2026
Rename the prose noun phrase "prune mode(s)" → "pruning mode(s)" (incl. the
section heading "Snapshot Types (Pruning Modes)" and the link text), for
canonical-English fluency and consistency with #21689. The `--prune.mode`
flag, the mode values, and the `prune-modes` page slug are unchanged.

Regenerate llms-full.txt artifacts.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@bloxster bloxster merged commit 28e9f53 into release/3.5 Jun 10, 2026
19 of 20 checks passed
@bloxster bloxster deleted the docs/pruning-modes-rename-20260609 branch June 10, 2026 09:53
bloxster pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 10, 2026
Relative link `[Pruning Modes](prune-modes)` still pointed at the old
`prune-modes` slug (renamed to `pruning-modes` in #21689), failing the
`docs-site / build` broken-link check. Repoint to `pruning-modes` and
regenerate the llms bundles.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants