Skip to content

Cover --no-duration and restore the CI coverage percentage threshold#384

Merged
mum4k merged 24 commits intoenvoyproxy:masterfrom
oschaaf:restore-coverage-no-duration
Jun 25, 2020
Merged

Cover --no-duration and restore the CI coverage percentage threshold#384
mum4k merged 24 commits intoenvoyproxy:masterfrom
oschaaf:restore-coverage-no-duration

Conversation

@oschaaf
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@oschaaf oschaaf commented Jun 24, 2020

In #366 we had to lower the coverage threshold as that PR didn't come
with the means to easily cover testing with infinite excecution
durations. Now that we have signal handling in place, we can easily
pull this off.

Fixes #370

Signed-off-by: Otto van der Schaaf oschaaf@we-amp.com


In preparation of sharing functionality for signal handling,
extract what we have right now into SignalHandler.

Status: draft

For fixing envoyproxy#280

Signed-off-by: Otto van der Schaaf <oschaaf@we-amp.com>
Signed-off-by: Otto van der Schaaf <oschaaf@we-amp.com>
Signed-off-by: Otto van der Schaaf <oschaaf@we-amp.com>
…ndler

Signed-off-by: Otto van der Schaaf <oschaaf@we-amp.com>
Signed-off-by: Otto van der Schaaf <oschaaf@we-amp.com>
Signed-off-by: Otto van der Schaaf <oschaaf@we-amp.com>
…ndler

Signed-off-by: Otto van der Schaaf <oschaaf@we-amp.com>
Signed-off-by: Otto van der Schaaf <oschaaf@we-amp.com>
Signed-off-by: Otto van der Schaaf <oschaaf@we-amp.com>
…ation

Signed-off-by: Otto van der Schaaf <oschaaf@we-amp.com>
Signed-off-by: Otto van der Schaaf <oschaaf@we-amp.com>
Signed-off-by: Otto van der Schaaf <oschaaf@we-amp.com>
Signed-off-by: Otto van der Schaaf <oschaaf@we-amp.com>
…ation

Signed-off-by: Otto van der Schaaf <oschaaf@we-amp.com>
…ation

Signed-off-by: Otto van der Schaaf <oschaaf@we-amp.com>
Signed-off-by: Otto van der Schaaf <oschaaf@we-amp.com>
Signed-off-by: Otto van der Schaaf <oschaaf@we-amp.com>
Signed-off-by: Otto van der Schaaf <oschaaf@we-amp.com>
In envoyproxy#366 we had to lower the coverage threshold as that PR didn't come
with the means to easily cover testing with infinite excecution
durations. Now that we have signal handling in place, we can easily
pull this off.

Fixes envoyproxy#370

Signed-off-by: Otto van der Schaaf <oschaaf@we-amp.com>
Signed-off-by: Otto van der Schaaf <oschaaf@we-amp.com>
@oschaaf oschaaf added waiting-for-review A PR waiting for a review. blocked A PR that is blocked by prerequisites. P1 labels Jun 24, 2020
…no-duration

Signed-off-by: Otto van der Schaaf <oschaaf@we-amp.com>
@oschaaf oschaaf removed the blocked A PR that is blocked by prerequisites. label Jun 24, 2020
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@mum4k mum4k left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for closing this coverage gap!

@mum4k mum4k merged commit ab496b6 into envoyproxy:master Jun 25, 2020
wjuan-AFK pushed a commit to wjuan-AFK/nighthawk that referenced this pull request Jul 14, 2020
…nvoyproxy#384)

In envoyproxy#366 we had to lower the coverage threshold as that PR didn't come
with the means to easily cover testing with infinite excecution
durations. Now that we have signal handling in place, we can easily
pull this off.

Fixes envoyproxy#370

Signed-off-by: Otto van der Schaaf <oschaaf@we-amp.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

P1 waiting-for-review A PR waiting for a review.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Fix missing test coverage for --no-duration

2 participants