Skip to content

api: generate v3alpha from v2 via protoxform.#8356

Merged
htuch merged 1 commit intoenvoyproxy:masterfrom
htuch:protoxform-multi-version
Sep 25, 2019
Merged

api: generate v3alpha from v2 via protoxform.#8356
htuch merged 1 commit intoenvoyproxy:masterfrom
htuch:protoxform-multi-version

Conversation

@htuch
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@htuch htuch commented Sep 24, 2019

This takes protoxform from being a v2 format tool to being able to
generate something similar to what ./api/migration/v3alpha.sh generates.

Risk level: Low (v3alpha not used yet)
Testing: fix_format, manual verification that the delta from
./api/migration/v3alpha.sh makes sense (for now).

Signed-off-by: Harvey Tuch htuch@google.com

This takes protoxform from being a v2 format tool to being able to
generate something similar to what ./api/migration/v3alpha.sh generates.

Risk level: Low (v3alpha not used yet)
Testing: fix_format, manual verification that the delta from
  ./api/migration/v3alpha.sh makes sense (for now).

Signed-off-by: Harvey Tuch <htuch@google.com>
option java_outer_classname = "CircuitBreakerProto";
option java_multiple_files = true;
option java_package = "io.envoyproxy.envoy.api.v3alpha.cluster";
option csharp_namespace = "Envoy.Api.V2.ClusterNS";
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These don't need to be in v3alpha, they will go away after we re-org envoy.api.v3alpha.

@htuch htuch merged commit 89539d3 into envoyproxy:master Sep 25, 2019
danzh2010 pushed a commit to danzh2010/envoy that referenced this pull request Oct 4, 2019
This takes protoxform from being a v2 format tool to being able to
generate something similar to what ./api/migration/v3alpha.sh generates.

Risk level: Low (v3alpha not used yet)
Testing: fix_format, manual verification that the delta from
  ./api/migration/v3alpha.sh makes sense (for now).

Signed-off-by: Harvey Tuch <htuch@google.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants