config_validation: fix heap-use-after-free.#5847
Merged
htuch merged 1 commit intoenvoyproxy:masterfrom Feb 8, 2019
Merged
Conversation
Same issue as in envoyproxy#4940, but on the config_validation side. Risk level: Low Testing: corpus entry added. Signed-off-by: Harvey Tuch <htuch@google.com>
junr03
approved these changes
Feb 8, 2019
Member
junr03
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for the ping on slack! Sorry for the delay, I forgot to update the maintainers calendar, I am ooo through the end of the week.
Up in the 🏔️🎿
Member
Author
|
@junr03 thanks, enjoy the skiing. Will not LB any reviews your way this week :) |
htuch
added a commit
to htuch/envoy
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 21, 2019
Another heap-user-after-free, this time we were missing a fix that had been applied to server.h but not config_validation/server.h (envoyproxy#4940). While working on this, attempted to make fully consistent and as simple/clear as possible the constraints on member ordering. This PR is in the tradition (!) of envoyproxy#5847, envoyproxy#4940, envoyproxy#4937. I think long-term we might want to think of more dynamic and explicit declaration of ordering constraints, it's evidently pretty fragile. Also, the lack of single-source-of-truth and duplication across prod and config server code bites again. Fixes oss-fuzz issue https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=13228. Risk level: Low Testing: Corpus entry added. Signed-off-by: Harvey Tuch <htuch@google.com>
htuch
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 21, 2019
Another heap-user-after-free, this time we were missing a fix that had been applied to server.h but not config_validation/server.h (#4940). While working on this, attempted to make fully consistent and as simple/clear as possible the constraints on member ordering. This PR is in the tradition (!) of #5847, #4940, #4937. I think long-term we might want to think of more dynamic and explicit declaration of ordering constraints, it's evidently pretty fragile. Also, the lack of single-source-of-truth and duplication across prod and config server code bites again. Fixes oss-fuzz issue https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=13228. Risk level: Low Testing: Corpus entry added. Signed-off-by: Harvey Tuch <htuch@google.com>
fredlas
pushed a commit
to fredlas/envoy
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 5, 2019
Same issue as in envoyproxy#4940, but on the config_validation side. Risk level: Low Testing: corpus entry added. Signed-off-by: Harvey Tuch <htuch@google.com> Signed-off-by: Fred Douglas <fredlas@google.com>
fredlas
pushed a commit
to fredlas/envoy
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 5, 2019
…#6023) Another heap-user-after-free, this time we were missing a fix that had been applied to server.h but not config_validation/server.h (envoyproxy#4940). While working on this, attempted to make fully consistent and as simple/clear as possible the constraints on member ordering. This PR is in the tradition (!) of envoyproxy#5847, envoyproxy#4940, envoyproxy#4937. I think long-term we might want to think of more dynamic and explicit declaration of ordering constraints, it's evidently pretty fragile. Also, the lack of single-source-of-truth and duplication across prod and config server code bites again. Fixes oss-fuzz issue https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=13228. Risk level: Low Testing: Corpus entry added. Signed-off-by: Harvey Tuch <htuch@google.com> Signed-off-by: Fred Douglas <fredlas@google.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Same issue as in #4940, but on the config_validation side.
Risk level: Low
Testing: corpus entry added.
Signed-off-by: Harvey Tuch htuch@google.com