Skip to content

deps: Revert PyJWT update to 1.7.1#15781

Merged
mattklein123 merged 1 commit intoenvoyproxy:mainfrom
Shikugawa:revert-15762
Mar 31, 2021
Merged

deps: Revert PyJWT update to 1.7.1#15781
mattklein123 merged 1 commit intoenvoyproxy:mainfrom
Shikugawa:revert-15762

Conversation

@Shikugawa
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@Shikugawa Shikugawa commented Mar 31, 2021

This reverts commit 7abb83c.

Signed-off-by: Shikugawa rei@tetrate.io

For an explanation of how to fill out the fields, please see the relevant section
in PULL_REQUESTS.md

Commit Message: Downgrade PyJWT to 1.7.1. It breaks dependency checking with the required PyJWT version mismatch. For more detail https://dev.azure.com/cncf/envoy/_build/results?buildId=70789&view=logs&jobId=1c04237c-5f52-5959-5f83-5522b3556331&j=1c04237c-5f52-5959-5f83-5522b3556331&t=db3f3889-c922-566b-fa2e-4bc4948bc467
Additional Description:
Risk Level:
Testing:
Docs Changes:
Release Notes:
Platform Specific Features:
[Optional Runtime guard:]
[Optional Fixes #Issue]
[Optional Deprecated:]
[Optional API Considerations:]

@Shikugawa Shikugawa requested a review from phlax March 31, 2021 03:08
@repokitteh-read-only
Copy link
Copy Markdown

CC @envoyproxy/dependency-shepherds: Your approval is needed for changes made to (bazel/.*repos.*\.bzl)|(bazel/dependency_imports\.bzl)|(api/bazel/.*\.bzl)|(.*/requirements\.txt)|(.*\.patch).

🐱

Caused by: #15781 was opened by Shikugawa.

see: more, trace.

@repokitteh-read-only repokitteh-read-only bot added the deps Approval required for changes to Envoy's external dependencies label Mar 31, 2021
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@phlax phlax left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

rather than reverting all of these could you just revert the package in question please

@phlax
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

phlax commented Mar 31, 2021

also this doesnt revert the breaking package

@phlax
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

phlax commented Mar 31, 2021

@Shikugawa i think it makes more sense to just open a new pr to downgrade the one breaking package - pyJWT - also if it breaks under a certain condition - perhaps trigger that if possible to ensure it is working

Signed-off-by: Shikugawa <rei@tetrate.io>
@Shikugawa
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@phlax For now pushed PyJWT downgrade. Could you take a look?

@Shikugawa Shikugawa changed the title Revert "python: Dependabot updates (#15762)" Revert PyJWT update from 1.7.1 Mar 31, 2021
@Shikugawa Shikugawa changed the title Revert PyJWT update from 1.7.1 deps: Revert PyJWT update from 1.7.1 Mar 31, 2021
@phlax
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

phlax commented Mar 31, 2021

looks good - but to ensure this works - could you cherry-pick this commit (temporarily) onto the other PR which broke to ensure this fixes it ?

@Shikugawa
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@phlax phlax left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm, thanks @Shikugawa

@phlax phlax requested a review from moderation March 31, 2021 09:59
@phlax
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

phlax commented Mar 31, 2021

perhaps change the title

deps: Revert PyJWT update from 1.7.1

deps: Revert PyJWT update to 1.7.1

@phlax phlax mentioned this pull request Mar 31, 2021
@Shikugawa Shikugawa changed the title deps: Revert PyJWT update from 1.7.1 deps: Revert PyJWT update to 1.7.1 Mar 31, 2021
@moderation
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/lgtm deps

@repokitteh-read-only repokitteh-read-only bot removed the deps Approval required for changes to Envoy's external dependencies label Mar 31, 2021
@mattklein123 mattklein123 merged commit 4e1fc18 into envoyproxy:main Mar 31, 2021
@Shikugawa Shikugawa deleted the revert-15762 branch March 31, 2021 16:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants