Declared Django 4.2 support in README.md#8985
Merged
auvipy merged 1 commit intoencode:masterfrom May 15, 2023
Merged
Conversation
Collaborator
|
thanks for your contribution and welcome aboard! |
Contributor
Author
|
Thank You . |
|
@auvipy do we have some expectations about new tags with Django 4.2 support? |
saadullahaleem
pushed a commit
to saadullahaleem/django-rest-framework
that referenced
this pull request
May 27, 2023
auvipy
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 29, 2023
* fix: Make the instance variable of child serializer point to the correct list object instead of the entire list when validating ListSerializer * fix formatting issues for list serializer validation fix * fix imports sorting for list serializer tests * remove django 2.2 from docs index (#8982) * Declared Django 4.2 support in README.md (#8985) * Fix Links in Documentation to Django `reverse` and `reverse_lazy` (#8986) * Fix Django Docs url in reverse.md Django URLs of the documentation of `reverse` and `reverse_lazy` were wrong. * Update reverse.md * fix URLPathVersioning reverse fallback (#7247) * fix URLPathVersioning reverse fallback * add test for URLPathVersioning reverse fallback * Update tests/test_versioning.py --------- Co-authored-by: Jorn van Wier <jorn.van.wier@thunderbyte.ai> Co-authored-by: Asif Saif Uddin <auvipy@gmail.com> * Make set_value a method within `Serializer` (#8001) * Make set_value a static method for Serializers As an alternative to #7671, let the method be overridden if needed. As the function is only used for serializers, it has a better place in the Serializer class. * Set `set_value` as an object (non-static) method * Add tests for set_value() These tests follow the examples given in the method. * fix: Make the instance variable of child serializer point to the correct list object instead of the entire list when validating ListSerializer * Make set_value a method within `Serializer` (#8001) * Make set_value a static method for Serializers As an alternative to #7671, let the method be overridden if needed. As the function is only used for serializers, it has a better place in the Serializer class. * Set `set_value` as an object (non-static) method * Add tests for set_value() These tests follow the examples given in the method. * fix: Make the instance variable of child serializer point to the correct list object instead of the entire list when validating ListSerializer * fix: Make the instance variable of child serializer point to the correct list object instead of the entire list when validating ListSerializer * fix formatting issues for list serializer validation fix * fix: Make the instance variable of child serializer point to the correct list object instead of the entire list when validating ListSerializer * fix formatting issues for list serializer validation fix * fix linting * Update rest_framework/serializers.py Co-authored-by: Sergei Shishov <sshishov@users.noreply.github.com> * Update rest_framework/serializers.py Co-authored-by: Sergei Shishov <sshishov@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: instance variable in list serializer, remove commented code --------- Co-authored-by: Mathieu Dupuy <deronnax@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Mehraz Hossain Rumman <59512321+MehrazRumman@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Dominik Bruhn <dominik@dbruhn.de> Co-authored-by: jornvanwier <mail@jornvanwier.com> Co-authored-by: Jorn van Wier <jorn.van.wier@thunderbyte.ai> Co-authored-by: Asif Saif Uddin <auvipy@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Étienne Beaulé <beauleetienne0@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Sergei Shishov <sshishov@users.noreply.github.com>
|
@auvipy does this mean DRF supports Django 4.2? If so, can it be bundled into a new release? 3.14.0 was released more than 6 months ago. |
Collaborator
|
I just need response/permission for the release |
|
Hi @auvipy, Any updates on the release of the new version? |
Collaborator
not yet. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Looks like an oversight !