fix: Remove MAEB+ and MAEB(extended) from leaderboard and add "beta" to all MAEB#4103
Merged
Conversation
related to #3470 We could consider keeping the two benchmarks (would still need to be beta as paper is review) so they could change.
…eta" to all MAEB related to #3470 - Remove MAEB+ and MAEB(extended) from leaderboard - Added the beta tag to denote that these might change Currently implemented it as keeping the two temporary benchmarks. We could consider removing them as well (I am unsure how much of a burden it is for us to maintain them), but I would probably not add them to the leaderboard. All of these changes should be backward compatible
…mark/mteb into maeb-quickfixes
Collaborator
|
Is beta added because the paper is in review? |
Samoed
approved these changes
Feb 17, 2026
isaac-chung
reviewed
Feb 17, 2026
Contributor
Author
yeah, essentially we could get reviews that point out flaws and we want to be able to accommodate those |
isaac-chung
approved these changes
Feb 17, 2026
fzowl
pushed a commit
to fzowl/mteb
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 19, 2026
… to all MAEB (embeddings-benchmark#4103) * fix: Remove MAEB+ and MAEB(extended) related to embeddings-benchmark#3470 We could consider keeping the two benchmarks (would still need to be beta as paper is review) so they could change. * fix: Remove MAEB+ and MAEB(extended) from leaderboard and make add "beta" to all MAEB related to embeddings-benchmark#3470 - Remove MAEB+ and MAEB(extended) from leaderboard - Added the beta tag to denote that these might change Currently implemented it as keeping the two temporary benchmarks. We could consider removing them as well (I am unsure how much of a burden it is for us to maintain them), but I would probably not add them to the leaderboard. All of these changes should be backward compatible * docs: Added whatsnew * implement fixes * update description to explain beta status
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
related to #3470
Currently implemented it as keeping the two temporary benchmarks. We could consider removing them as well (I am unsure how much of a burden it is for us to maintain them), but I would probably not add them to the leaderboard.
All of these changes should be backward compatible