Skip to content

[8.15] Case custom fields GA (backport #5591)#5619

Merged
nastasha-solomon merged 2 commits into8.15from
mergify/bp/8.15/pr-5591
Aug 8, 2024
Merged

[8.15] Case custom fields GA (backport #5591)#5619
nastasha-solomon merged 2 commits into8.15from
mergify/bp/8.15/pr-5591

Conversation

@mergify
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@mergify mergify bot commented Jul 26, 2024

Relates to elastic/kibana#188598

This PR updates the Observability case documentation related to custom fields moving from "tech preview" to "GA" state in 8.15.0. It also moves the existing custom fields content to the updated case settings page.


This is an automatic backport of pull request #5591 done by Mergify.

@mergify mergify bot requested a review from a team as a code owner July 26, 2024 20:58
@mergify
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

mergify bot commented Jul 26, 2024

Cherry-pick of 294e0f5 has failed:

On branch mergify/bp/8.15/pr-5591
Your branch is up to date with 'origin/8.15'.

You are currently cherry-picking commit 294e0f51.
  (fix conflicts and run "git cherry-pick --continue")
  (use "git cherry-pick --skip" to skip this patch)
  (use "git cherry-pick --abort" to cancel the cherry-pick operation)

Changes to be committed:
	modified:   docs/cases/cases-manage.asciidoc
	deleted:    docs/cases/images/cases-custom-field-settings.png
	new file:   docs/serverless/images/cases-settings/security-cases-custom-fields.png

Unmerged paths:
  (use "git add/rm <file>..." as appropriate to mark resolution)
	both modified:   docs/cases/cases-ui-integrations.asciidoc
	deleted by us:   docs/serverless/investigate/cases-open-manage.mdx
	deleted by us:   docs/serverless/investigate/cases-settings.mdx

To fix up this pull request, you can check it out locally. See documentation: https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/reviewing-changes-in-pull-requests/checking-out-pull-requests-locally

@mergify mergify bot assigned lcawl Jul 26, 2024
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

A documentation preview will be available soon.

Request a new doc build by commenting
  • Rebuild this PR: run docs-build
  • Rebuild this PR and all Elastic docs: run docs-build rebuild

run docs-build is much faster than run docs-build rebuild. A rebuild should only be needed in rare situations.

If your PR continues to fail for an unknown reason, the doc build pipeline may be broken. Elastic employees can check the pipeline status here.

@lcawl lcawl force-pushed the mergify/bp/8.15/pr-5591 branch from 1b364c6 to 2dd1c3f Compare July 26, 2024 22:24
To close cases when they are sent to an external system, select *Automatically close cases when pushing new incident to external system*.

[float]
[[cases-ui-integrations]]
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@lcawl this anchor name is replicated in the topic anchor here -- or maybe it's the other way around? How did you want to handle this, and do we need to fix this in any other branches?

@mergify
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

mergify bot commented Jul 30, 2024

This pull request is now in conflicts. Could you fix it @mergify[bot]? 🙏
To fixup this pull request, you can check out it locally. See documentation: https://help.github.com/articles/checking-out-pull-requests-locally/

git fetch upstream
git checkout -b mergify/bp/8.15/pr-5591 upstream/mergify/bp/8.15/pr-5591
git merge upstream/8.15
git push upstream mergify/bp/8.15/pr-5591

@lcawl lcawl force-pushed the mergify/bp/8.15/pr-5591 branch from abc5c89 to 15a0c94 Compare August 8, 2024 15:20
@lcawl lcawl removed the conflicts label Aug 8, 2024
@nastasha-solomon nastasha-solomon merged commit 19a3feb into 8.15 Aug 8, 2024
@mergify mergify bot deleted the mergify/bp/8.15/pr-5591 branch August 8, 2024 15:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants