Clean up the Fleet OpenAPI readme#143143
Conversation
|
Pinging @elastic/fleet (Team:Fleet) |
|
@jen-huang Should I remove the experimental note while I have this file open? |
kpollich
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Changes LGTM - thank you for cleaning this up.
Should I also remove the experimental note?
No, the Fleet API is still considered experimental. We're actively pursuing a formalized beta designation as part of the process laid out in #123150.
@nchaulet has some draft docs for the new agent/package policy APIs here: https://github.com/elastic/observability-docs/issues/2180. Once these land we'll cut over from Experimental -> Beta for the Fleet API.
I'll make a note in the GA meta issue to audit and update any public facing docs we have for the Fleet API or its associated OpenAPI spec here to replace Experimental with Beta when ready.
🚀
|
Thanks! Getting the info from https://github.com/elastic/observability-docs/issues/2180 into the docs is on my list. |
|
Since we aren't going to change the experimental note in this PR, I will backport this to 8.4 too. |
(cherry picked from commit 54879f4)
(cherry picked from commit 54879f4)
💔 Some backports could not be created
Note: Successful backport PRs will be merged automatically after passing CI. Manual backportTo create the backport manually run: Questions ?Please refer to the Backport tool documentation |
|
We don't need this in 7.17, so don't worry about the failed backport. |
Summary
Fixed a few problems in the readme file that were kind of annoying me. I didn't worry about things like passive voice that I normally fix because this file seems consistent with others in the Kibana repo. Here is what the changed file looks like:
Summary of changes:
TO DO:
Checklist
Delete any items that are not applicable to this PR.