Skip to content

Test elastic-package#3330 - DO NOT MERGE#17639

Closed
mrodm wants to merge 2 commits intoelastic:mainfrom
mrodm:test-elastic-package-pr-3330-include-revert
Closed

Test elastic-package#3330 - DO NOT MERGE#17639
mrodm wants to merge 2 commits intoelastic:mainfrom
mrodm:test-elastic-package-pr-3330-include-revert

Conversation

@mrodm
Copy link
Collaborator

@mrodm mrodm commented Mar 3, 2026

Update elastic-package reference to elastic/elastic-package@138d221f.

This PR is related to #17636 , but includes also the revert of go-ucfg to v0.8.8

Relates: elastic/elastic-package#3330

Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is a test PR (as indicated by 'DO NOT MERGE' in the title) that validates elastic-package PR #3330 against this repository's CI pipeline.

Key observation: The replace directive in go.mod:256 points to a personal fork (github.com/mrodm/elastic-package). This is expected for testing purposes but must not be merged to main.

The transitive dependency updates (k8s 0.35.1→0.35.2, golang.org/x/net 0.50.0→0.51.0) are side effects of the replaced package version and appear benign.

No blocking issues since this PR is explicitly not intended for merge.


Why is Claude responding? | Type @claude to interact further

Give us feedback! React with 🚀 if perfect, 👍 if helpful, 👎 if not.

@elastic-vault-github-plugin-prod

🚀 Benchmarks report

Package cloud_security_posture 👍(1) 💚(0) 💔(1)

Expand to view
Data stream Previous EPS New EPS Diff (%) Result
vulnerabilities 142857.14 111111.11 -31746.03 (-22.22%) 💔

To see the full report comment with /test benchmark fullreport

@elasticmachine
Copy link

💚 Build Succeeded

cc @mrodm

@mrodm mrodm closed this Mar 4, 2026
@mrodm mrodm deleted the test-elastic-package-pr-3330-include-revert branch March 4, 2026 16:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants