Skip to content

Fix HiddenField checkstyle problems in client/#80549

Merged
pugnascotia merged 1 commit intoelastic:masterfrom
pugnascotia:customize-hidden-field-checkstyle-rule
Nov 10, 2021
Merged

Fix HiddenField checkstyle problems in client/#80549
pugnascotia merged 1 commit intoelastic:masterfrom
pugnascotia:customize-hidden-field-checkstyle-rule

Conversation

@pugnascotia
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Part of #19752.

Fix a number of cases of shadows vars under client/rest-high-level. As
part of this, fork the Checkstyle HiddeFieldCheck class so that it
understand the pattern of settings with no "set" prefix.

Fix a number of cases of shadows vars under client/rest-high-level. As
part of this, fork the Checkstyle HiddeFieldCheck class so that it
understand the pattern of settings with no "set" prefix.
@elasticmachine elasticmachine added the Team:Delivery Meta label for Delivery team label Nov 9, 2021
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-delivery (Team:Delivery)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@mark-vieira mark-vieira left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@pugnascotia pugnascotia merged commit cb26146 into elastic:master Nov 10, 2021
@pugnascotia pugnascotia deleted the customize-hidden-field-checkstyle-rule branch November 10, 2021 13:25
pugnascotia added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 10, 2021
Part of #19752.

Fix a number of cases of shadows vars under `client/rest-high-level`. As
part of this, fork the Checkstyle `HiddeFieldCheck` class so that it
understand the pattern of settings with no "set" prefix.
@pugnascotia
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Backported to 7.16 in c2da6b1.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

:Delivery/Build Build or test infrastructure >refactoring Team:Delivery Meta label for Delivery team v7.16.0 v8.0.0-rc2 v8.1.0

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants