Apply keyword normalizers in the field retrieval API.#59260
Merged
jtibshirani merged 1 commit intoelastic:field-retrievalfrom Jul 9, 2020
Merged
Apply keyword normalizers in the field retrieval API.#59260jtibshirani merged 1 commit intoelastic:field-retrievalfrom
jtibshirani merged 1 commit intoelastic:field-retrievalfrom
Conversation
Collaborator
|
Pinging @elastic/es-search (:Search/Search) |
fbeb277 to
2af35f7
Compare
0cf8cfe to
0306cda
Compare
jtibshirani
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 16, 2020
As we discussed in the meta-issue, when returning `keyword` in the fields retrieval API, we'll apply their `normalizer`. This decision is not a clear-cut one, and we'll validate it with internal users before merging the feature branch.
jtibshirani
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 18, 2020
As we discussed in the meta-issue, when returning `keyword` in the fields retrieval API, we'll apply their `normalizer`. This decision is not a clear-cut one, and we'll validate it with internal users before merging the feature branch.
jtibshirani
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 21, 2020
As we discussed in the meta-issue, when returning `keyword` in the fields retrieval API, we'll apply their `normalizer`. This decision is not a clear-cut one, and we'll validate it with internal users before merging the feature branch.
jtibshirani
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 23, 2020
As we discussed in the meta-issue, when returning `keyword` in the fields retrieval API, we'll apply their `normalizer`. This decision is not a clear-cut one, and we'll validate it with internal users before merging the feature branch.
jtibshirani
added a commit
to jtibshirani/elasticsearch
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 27, 2020
As we discussed in the meta-issue, when returning `keyword` in the fields retrieval API, we'll apply their `normalizer`. This decision is not a clear-cut one, and we'll validate it with internal users before merging the feature branch.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As we discussed in #55363 (comment), when returning
keywordin the fields retrieval API, we'll apply theirnormalizer. This decision is not a clear-cut one, and we'll validate it with internal users before merging the feature branch.Relates to #55363.