Check dot-index rules after template application#52087
Merged
AthenaEryma merged 5 commits intoelastic:masterfrom Feb 10, 2020
Merged
Check dot-index rules after template application#52087AthenaEryma merged 5 commits intoelastic:masterfrom
AthenaEryma merged 5 commits intoelastic:masterfrom
Conversation
Previously, the dot-index rules (namely, that indices with dot-prefixed names should be either hidden indices or system indices) was done before* template application, and so only checked for the `index.hidden` setting in the request, ignoring if that setting was set via a template. This commit moves that check to a different method, which is applied after templates have been resolved and applied to the index settings.
Collaborator
|
Pinging @elastic/es-core-infra (:Core/Infra/Core) |
rjernst
approved these changes
Feb 10, 2020
server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/cluster/metadata/MetaDataCreateIndexService.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
AthenaEryma
added a commit
to AthenaEryma/elasticsearch
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 10, 2020
Previously, the dot-index rules (namely, that indices with dot-prefixed names should be either hidden indices or system indices) was done before* template application, and so only checked for the `index.hidden` setting in the request, ignoring if that setting was set via a template. This commit moves that check to a different method, which is applied after templates have been resolved and applied to the index settings.
AthenaEryma
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 11, 2020
Previously, the dot-index rules (namely, that indices with dot-prefixed names should be either hidden indices or system indices) was done before* template application, and so only checked for the `index.hidden` setting in the request, ignoring if that setting was set via a template. This commit moves that check to a different method, which is applied after templates have been resolved and applied to the index settings.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Previously, the dot-index rules (namely, that indices with dot-prefixed
names should be either hidden indices or system indices) was done
before* template application, and so only checked for the
index.hiddensetting in the request, ignoring if that setting was set via a template.
This commit moves that check to a different method, which is applied
after templates have been resolved and applied to the index settings.
I discovered this while working on #51456 - I noticed that I hadn't removed the
.slm-history*entry from the exclusions list without triggering theassertintended to ensure that the exclusions list was updated as necessary.