Skip to content

[7.x] Handle failure to retrieve ILM policy step better (#49193)#49316

Merged
andreidan merged 1 commit intoelastic:7.xfrom
andreidan:backport/7x-ilm-mark-failure-to-retrieve-step
Nov 19, 2019
Merged

[7.x] Handle failure to retrieve ILM policy step better (#49193)#49316
andreidan merged 1 commit intoelastic:7.xfrom
andreidan:backport/7x-ilm-mark-failure-to-retrieve-step

Conversation

@andreidan
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This commit wraps the calls to retrieve the current step in a try/catch
so that the exception does not bubble up. Instead, step info is added
containing the exception to the existing step.

Semi-related to #49128

(cherry picked from commit 72530f8)
Signed-off-by: Andrei Dan andrei.dan@elastic.co

Backport of #49193

This commit wraps the calls to retrieve the current step in a try/catch
so that the exception does not bubble up. Instead, step info is added
containing the exception to the existing step.

Semi-related to elastic#49128

(cherry picked from commit 72530f8)
Signed-off-by: Andrei Dan <andrei.dan@elastic.co>
@andreidan andreidan added :Data Management/ILM+SLM DO NOT USE. Use ":StorageEngine/ILM" or ":Distributed Coordination/SLM" instead. backport v7.6.0 labels Nov 19, 2019
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-core-features (:Core/Features/ILM+SLM)

@andreidan andreidan changed the title Handle failure to retrieve ILM policy step better (#49193) [7x] Handle failure to retrieve ILM policy step better (#49193) Nov 19, 2019
@andreidan andreidan changed the title [7x] Handle failure to retrieve ILM policy step better (#49193) [7.x] Handle failure to retrieve ILM policy step better (#49193) Nov 19, 2019
@andreidan andreidan merged commit 19780e2 into elastic:7.x Nov 19, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backport :Data Management/ILM+SLM DO NOT USE. Use ":StorageEngine/ILM" or ":Distributed Coordination/SLM" instead. v7.6.0

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants