Support optional parsers in any order with DateMathParser Backport(46654)#47217
Merged
pgomulka merged 3 commits intoelastic:7.xfrom Sep 30, 2019
Merged
Support optional parsers in any order with DateMathParser Backport(46654)#47217pgomulka merged 3 commits intoelastic:7.xfrom
pgomulka merged 3 commits intoelastic:7.xfrom
Conversation
…elastic#46654) Currently DateMathParser with roundUp = true is relying on the DateFormatter build with combined optional sub parsers with defaulted fields (depending on the formatter). That means that for yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss||yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss.SSS Java.time implementation expects optional parsers in order from most specific to least specific (reverse in the example above). It is causing a problem because the first parsing succeeds but does not consume the full input. The second parser should be used. We can work around this with keeping a list of RoundUpParsers and iterate over them choosing the one that parsed full input. The same approach we used for regular (non date math) in relates elastic#40100 The jdk is not considering this to be a bug https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8188771 Those below will expect this change first relates elastic#46242 relates elastic#45284
Collaborator
|
Pinging @elastic/es-core-infra |
pgomulka
added a commit
to pgomulka/elasticsearch
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 9, 2019
…654) (elastic#47217) Currently DateMathParser with roundUp = true is relying on the DateFormatter build with combined optional sub parsers with defaulted fields (depending on the formatter). That means that for yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss||yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss.SSS Java.time implementation expects optional parsers in order from most specific to least specific (reverse in the example above). It is causing a problem because the first parsing succeeds but does not consume the full input. The second parser should be used. We can work around this with keeping a list of RoundUpParsers and iterate over them choosing the one that parsed full input. The same approach we used for regular (non date math) in relates elastic#40100 The jdk is not considering this to be a bug https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8188771 Those below will expect this change first relates elastic#46242 relates elastic#45284 backport elastic#46654
pgomulka
added a commit
to pgomulka/elasticsearch
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 7, 2020
…654) (elastic#47217) Currently DateMathParser with roundUp = true is relying on the DateFormatter build with combined optional sub parsers with defaulted fields (depending on the formatter). That means that for yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss||yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss.SSS Java.time implementation expects optional parsers in order from most specific to least specific (reverse in the example above). It is causing a problem because the first parsing succeeds but does not consume the full input. The second parser should be used. We can work around this with keeping a list of RoundUpParsers and iterate over them choosing the one that parsed full input. The same approach we used for regular (non date math) in relates elastic#40100 The jdk is not considering this to be a bug https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8188771 Those below will expect this change first relates elastic#46242 relates elastic#45284 backport elastic#46654
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Currently DateMathParser with roundUp = true is relying on the DateFormatter build with
combined optional sub parsers with defaulted fields (depending on the formatter).
That means that for yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss||yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss.SSS
Java.time implementation expects optional parsers in order from most specific to
least specific (reverse in the example above).
It is causing a problem because the first parsing succeeds but does not consume the full input.
The second parser should be used.
We can work around this with keeping a list of RoundUpParsers and iterate over them choosing
the one that parsed full input. The same approach we used for regular (non date math) in
relates #40100
The jdk is not considering this to be a bug https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8188771
Those below will expect this change first
relates #46242
relates #45284
backport #46654