Skip to content

[DOCS] Reformat flush API docs#46875

Merged
jrodewig merged 1 commit intoelastic:masterfrom
jrodewig:flush-api-docs-reformat
Sep 27, 2019
Merged

[DOCS] Reformat flush API docs#46875
jrodewig merged 1 commit intoelastic:masterfrom
jrodewig:flush-api-docs-reformat

Conversation

@jrodewig
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Changes

  • Reformats the flush API docs are formatted to align with the new API reference template.
  • Updates several internal references to the removed synced-flush-api anchor.

Dependent on elastic/elasticsearch-js#972. CI failures are expected until that PR is merged and backported.

Relates to #43765.

@jrodewig jrodewig added >docs General docs changes :Data Management/Indices APIs DO NOT USE. Use ":Distributed/Indices APIs" or ":StorageEngine/Templates" instead. :Distributed/Allocation All issues relating to the decision making around placing a shard (both master logic & on the nodes) v8.0.0 v7.3.0 v7.4.0 v7.5.0 labels Sep 19, 2019
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-docs

@elasticmachine
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-core-features

@elasticmachine
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-distributed

@jrodewig
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@elasticmachine run elasticsearch-ci/docs

@jrodewig jrodewig marked this pull request as ready for review September 27, 2019 12:37
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@szabosteve szabosteve left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

:Data Management/Indices APIs DO NOT USE. Use ":Distributed/Indices APIs" or ":StorageEngine/Templates" instead. :Distributed/Allocation All issues relating to the decision making around placing a shard (both master logic & on the nodes) >docs General docs changes v7.3.0 v7.4.1 v7.5.0 v8.0.0-alpha1

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants