Avoid creating a green index in RetentionLeaseIT#39347
Merged
DaveCTurner merged 1 commit intoelastic:masterfrom Feb 25, 2019
Merged
Avoid creating a green index in RetentionLeaseIT#39347DaveCTurner merged 1 commit intoelastic:masterfrom
DaveCTurner merged 1 commit intoelastic:masterfrom
Conversation
In elastic#39224 we made shard history retention lease syncing ignore the `index.write.wait_for_active_shards` setting on the index, and added a test that showed that it was ignored. However the test as merged actually creates a green index, so the `wait_for_active_shards` setting has no effect. This change adjusts the test to create a yellow index to verify that `wait_for_active_shards` really is ignored.
Collaborator
|
Pinging @elastic/es-distributed |
DaveCTurner
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 25, 2019
In #39224 we made shard history retention lease syncing ignore the `index.write.wait_for_active_shards` setting on the index, and added a test that showed that it was ignored. However the test as merged actually creates a green index, so the `wait_for_active_shards` setting has no effect. This change adjusts the test to create a yellow index to verify that `wait_for_active_shards` really is ignored.
DaveCTurner
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 25, 2019
In #39224 we made shard history retention lease syncing ignore the `index.write.wait_for_active_shards` setting on the index, and added a test that showed that it was ignored. However the test as merged actually creates a green index, so the `wait_for_active_shards` setting has no effect. This change adjusts the test to create a yellow index to verify that `wait_for_active_shards` really is ignored.
DaveCTurner
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 25, 2019
In #39224 we made shard history retention lease syncing ignore the `index.write.wait_for_active_shards` setting on the index, and added a test that showed that it was ignored. However the test as merged actually creates a green index, so the `wait_for_active_shards` setting has no effect. This change adjusts the test to create a yellow index to verify that `wait_for_active_shards` really is ignored.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In #39224 we made shard history retention lease syncing ignore the
index.write.wait_for_active_shardssetting on the index, and added a testthat showed that it was ignored. However the test as merged actually creates a
green index, so the
wait_for_active_shardssetting has no effect. This changeadjusts the test to create a yellow index to verify that
wait_for_active_shardsreally is ignored.