Skip to content

[DOCS] restructure java clients docs pages#25517

Merged
javanna merged 1 commit intoelastic:masterfrom
javanna:docs/java_clients_chapters_parts
Jul 4, 2017
Merged

[DOCS] restructure java clients docs pages#25517
javanna merged 1 commit intoelastic:masterfrom
javanna:docs/java_clients_chapters_parts

Conversation

@javanna
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@javanna javanna commented Jul 3, 2017

This commit converts the low level client and high level client chapters into two parts, which allows each high level client supported api to be on a separate page and show up in the index on the right.

This commit converts the low level client and high level client chapters into two parts, which allows each high level client supported api to be on a separate page and show up in the index on the right.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@nik9000 nik9000 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Makes sense to me. If it looks good on render I'm happy with it. @clintongormley may also want to look.

@javanna javanna merged commit 3c5eb6c into elastic:master Jul 4, 2017
javanna added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 4, 2017
This commit converts the low level client and high level client chapters into two parts, which allows each high level client supported api to be on a separate page and show up in the index on the right.
jasontedor added a commit to jasontedor/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Jul 4, 2017
* master:
  [Analysis] Support normalizer in request param (elastic#24767)
  Remove deprecated IdsQueryBuilder constructor (elastic#25529)
  Adds check for negative search request size (elastic#25397)
  test: also inspect the upgrade api response to check whether the upgrade really ran
  [DOCS] restructure java clients docs pages (elastic#25517)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants