Even though we don't index the _id field explicitly, we can support prefix style query/filter on it (in a similar manner that we support term(s) query/filter on it - though there is also an explicit ids query).
There isn't really a need to add an ids_prefix style query/filter, since we can provide the same functionality automatically with prefix (again, in a similar manner that ids query/filter is no longer really needed).
The prefix query/filter will automatically work only against the specific type(s) if searching against the type (defined in the search request), or the field is prefixed by it (my_type._id as the prefix field name).
Even though we don't index the
_idfield explicitly, we can support prefix style query/filter on it (in a similar manner that we support term(s) query/filter on it - though there is also an explicitidsquery).There isn't really a need to add an
ids_prefixstyle query/filter, since we can provide the same functionality automatically withprefix(again, in a similar manner thatidsquery/filter is no longer really needed).The
prefixquery/filter will automatically work only against the specific type(s) if searching against the type (defined in the search request), or the field is prefixed by it (my_type._idas the prefix field name).