Cherry-pick #18139 to 7.x: [Uptime] Fix nesting of x509 subject#18179
Merged
andrewvc merged 1 commit intoelastic:7.xfrom May 4, 2020
Merged
Cherry-pick #18139 to 7.x: [Uptime] Fix nesting of x509 subject#18179andrewvc merged 1 commit intoelastic:7.xfrom
andrewvc merged 1 commit intoelastic:7.xfrom
Conversation
In elastic#17687 we added additional x509 fields. The mapping accidentally double nested subject fields as subject.subject. This fixes that. There are no tests here because we don't really have testing around mappings, and it's sort of difficult to test without being repetitive, so none are included here. (cherry picked from commit a81bbda)
Contributor
|
Pinging @elastic/uptime (Team:Uptime) |
Contributor
💚 Build SucceededExpand to view the summary
Build stats
Test stats 🧪
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Cherry-pick of PR #18139 to 7.x branch. Original message:
In #17687 we added additional x509 fields. The mapping accidentally
double nested subject fields as subject.subject. This fixes that.
There are no tests here because we don't really have testing around
mappings, and it's sort of difficult to test without being repetitive,
so none are included here.
Checklist
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation- [ ] I have made corresponding change to the default configuration files- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works- [ ] I have added an entry inCHANGELOG.next.asciidocorCHANGELOG-developer.next.asciidoc.Author's Checklist
Use cases
Screenshots
Logs