Updated the branch on top of current origin/devel and resolved conflicts in rhwp-studio/index.html, rhwp-studio/vite.config.ts, and src/document_core/mod.rs.

Current validation after rebase:

• gitleaks detect --source . --log-opts origin/devel..HEAD --redact --no-banner --verbose: no leaks found
• sensitive string scan on origin/devel..HEAD: no internal paths/IP/token patterns found
• cargo test fragment_paste --tests: passed
• docker compose --env-file .env.docker run --rm wasm: passed, local pkg regenerated for verification
• cd rhwp-studio && npm run build: passed

I also added a local pre-push guard in my working copy to prevent accidentally pushing local/*, archive/internal/*, or public branches containing internal paths such as mydocs/.

Welcome to the rhwp project, @dragonnite1221-lgtm! 🎉 This is your first PR and the scope is impressive — HWPX fragment paste with both raw XML and IR migration paths, a yangsik dialog, and thorough test coverage.

We've completed a detailed code review. The overall quality is good, but there are a few items to address before we can merge.

What we liked

• Dual approach (raw XML path + IR migration path) with independent tests for each
• Byte-preserving principle consistently applied
• Path traversal defense in vite-plugin-yangsik-fragments.ts
• ~40 unit tests + 4 integration tests — solid coverage

Requested changes

1. Dual implementation overlap (medium)

fragment_paste.rs (raw XML ID remap) and cross_document_migrate.rs (IR ID remap) implement the same purpose with separate IdRemap structs. The WASM bridge exposes two entry points (pasteHwpxFragment + pasteHwpxFragmentInDocument) but the PR description doesn't explain why both are needed or how they'll converge.

Ask: Please add a note in the PR description explaining the intent, or consolidate into one path if the other is experimental.

2. Type cast in wasm-bridge.ts (medium)

(this.doc as any).pasteHwpxFragmentInDocument(...)

This bypasses compile-time type safety. Please add the method to the WASM binding type definition instead of using as any.

3. Environment-dependent tests (medium)

fragment_paste_in_document_yangsik.rs depends on ~/rhwp-layout-profiles/personal-templates/양식_3bf55ee3.hwpx — a path that only exists on your local machine. These tests are always skipped in CI and provide no regression protection.

Ask: Either bundle a small test fixture in saved/ or samples/, or remove the environment-dependent tests and keep only the self-contained ones.

4. Comment/code mismatch (low)

wasm_api.rs comments reference saved/03-blank_hwpx.hwpx but the actual added file is saved/04-blank_hwpx_empty.hwpx. Please align the comment.

5. Unused function (low)

build_occupied_sets in fragment_paste.rs appears to be defined but the same logic is reimplemented inline in recompute_one_table. This may trigger dead_code warnings. Please remove the unused function or use it.

How to proceed

1. Address items baseline/line_height/line_spacing 역공학 #1–cellzoneList(셀 영역 배경) 미지원으로 표 배경 누락 #5 above
2. Rebase onto current devel to resolve the conflict
3. Push the updated branch — we'll re-review

We're also happy to discuss architecture decisions (e.g., the dual-path approach) in a GitHub Discussion or Issue if that would help.

Thank you for the contribution, and looking forward to the updated PR!

Thanks for the rebase and conflict resolution. We've tested the code locally — cargo test 1306 passed and tsc --noEmit clean. The paste engine and dialog infrastructure work well.

However, we can't merge in the current state because there are no example yangsik fragment files included. When a user clicks "양식 부품" in the menu, they see "양식 부품 카탈로그가 비어있습니다" — the feature has no usable content.

We need the PR to be end-to-end testable by a maintainer in the web editor, not only through unit/integration tests with inline XML.

What's needed

Please add 1–2 example .hwpx fragment files in rhwp-studio/public/yangsik-fragments/ so that:

1. vite-plugin-yangsik-fragments.ts generates a non-empty manifest.json at build time
2. The "양식 부품" dialog shows the example entries
3. Clicking an entry actually pastes the fragment into the document

A simple table or a standard form header would be sufficient as a demo.

Summary of pending items

Once the example fragments are added and items #1–5 are addressed (or explained), we'll re-review and proceed with the merge.

Thank you!

One more question — the feature is named "HWPX fragment paste", but rhwp-studio also opens HWP5 (.hwp) files.

Does this feature work when the active document is an HWP5 file? HWP5 uses OLE compound binary format while the fragments are HWPX XML. If fragment paste only works with HWPX documents, the canExecute guard should check the document format (e.g., ctx.sourceFormat === 'hwpx') to prevent users from attempting an unsupported operation.

Please clarify:

1. Is fragment paste supported for HWP5 documents?
2. If not, does the code gracefully handle it (error message) or silently fail?
3. Should the menu item be disabled for HWP5 documents?

Closing this PR as there has been no response to the review feedback.

The code quality was good and the fragment paste infrastructure was well-designed. If you'd like to revisit this in the future, please address the items listed in the previous review comments (example yangsik fragments, dual implementation clarification, HWP5 compatibility, etc.) and open a new PR.

Thank you for the contribution!