Automatic reply from Jenkins: Can I test this?

Jenkins: ok to test

@ocaisa: you should consider changes the name of Paraview to ParaView wherever it's used as a dep?

and then we can probably get rid of the easyconfigs using the faulty name Paraview?

Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/5246/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

I can't find this as a dependency anywhere...it's mentioned in an OpenFOAM patch that's all

Some of the new PRs have it:

• https://github.com/hpcugent/easybuild-easyconfigs/pull/2142/files#diff-1ac4947119851357e1e6597e321211e9R37
• https://github.com/hpcugent/easybuild-easyconfigs/pull/2048/files#diff-905cfb22d1be95155079af3382ea5199R42
• https://github.com/hpcugent/easybuild-easyconfigs/pull/2023/files#diff-0f8fe653b4f48acd9d745f3bf8db2df3R42

So, now's a good time to rename them...

@hajgato: thoughts?

Easyconfigs unit test suite PASSed (see https://jenkins1.ugent.be/job/easybuild-easyconfigs-pr-builder/5333/console for more details).

This pull request is now ready for review/testing.

Please try and find someone who can tackle this; contact @boegel if you're not sure what to do.

Going in, thanks @ocaisa!