Skip to content

[23782] Remote writers considered volatile by default (backport #6085)#6086

Merged
MiguelCompany merged 1 commit into3.2.xfrom
mergify/bp/3.2.x/pr-6085
Oct 10, 2025
Merged

[23782] Remote writers considered volatile by default (backport #6085)#6086
MiguelCompany merged 1 commit into3.2.xfrom
mergify/bp/3.2.x/pr-6085

Conversation

@mergify
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@mergify mergify bot commented Oct 9, 2025

Description

@Mergifyio backport 3.3.x 3.2.x

Contributor Checklist

  • Commit messages follow the project guidelines.

  • The code follows the style guidelines of this project.

  • Tests that thoroughly check the new feature have been added/Regression tests checking the bug and its fix have been added; the added tests pass locally

  • N/A: Any new/modified methods have been properly documented using Doxygen.

  • N/A: Any new configuration API has an equivalent XML API (with the corresponding XSD extension)

  • Changes are backport compatible: they do NOT break ABI nor change library core behavior.

  • Changes are API compatible.

  • N/A: New feature has been added to the versions.md file (if applicable).

  • N/A: New feature has been documented/Current behavior is correctly described in the documentation.

  • Applicable backports have been included in the description.

Reviewer Checklist

  • The PR has a milestone assigned.
  • The title and description correctly express the PR's purpose.
  • Check contributor checklist is correct.
  • N/A: If this is a critical bug fix, backports to the critical-only supported branches have been requested.
  • Check CI results: changes do not issue any warning.
  • Check CI results: failing tests are unrelated with the changes.

This is an automatic backport of pull request #6085 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com).

@MiguelCompany MiguelCompany added this to the v3.2.3 milestone Oct 9, 2025
@MiguelCompany MiguelCompany self-requested a review October 9, 2025 05:50
@github-actions github-actions bot added the ci-pending PR which CI is running label Oct 9, 2025
@mergify
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

mergify bot commented Oct 9, 2025

🧪 CI Insights

Here's what we observed from your CI run for 67539fa.

❌ Job Failures

Pipeline Job Health on 3.2.x Retries 🔍 CI Insights 📄 Logs
Fast DDS MacOS CI mac-ci / fastdds_test () Unknown 0 View View

@MiguelCompany
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@Mergifyio rebase

@MiguelCompany MiguelCompany removed their request for review October 9, 2025 14:03
@mergify
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

mergify bot commented Oct 9, 2025

rebase

☑️ Nothing to do, the required conditions are not met

Details
  • any of:
    • #commits > 1 [📌 rebase requirement]
    • #commits-behind > 0 [📌 rebase requirement]
    • -linear-history [📌 rebase requirement]
  • -closed [📌 rebase requirement]
  • -conflict [📌 rebase requirement]
  • queue-position = -1 [📌 rebase requirement]

@MiguelCompany
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@Mergifyio rebase

* Refs #23778. Regression test.

Signed-off-by: Miguel Company <miguelcompany@eprosima.com>

* Refs #23778. Fix issue.

Signed-off-by: Miguel Company <miguelcompany@eprosima.com>

* Refs #23778. Improved solution.

Signed-off-by: Miguel Company <miguelcompany@eprosima.com>

---------

Signed-off-by: Miguel Company <miguelcompany@eprosima.com>
(cherry picked from commit 0e7204f)
@mergify
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

mergify bot commented Oct 10, 2025

rebase

✅ Branch has been successfully rebased

@MiguelCompany MiguelCompany force-pushed the mergify/bp/3.2.x/pr-6085 branch from a914d91 to 67539fa Compare October 10, 2025 05:42
@MiguelCompany MiguelCompany self-requested a review October 10, 2025 05:47
@MiguelCompany MiguelCompany merged commit d631657 into 3.2.x Oct 10, 2025
27 of 28 checks passed
@MiguelCompany MiguelCompany deleted the mergify/bp/3.2.x/pr-6085 branch October 10, 2025 13:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ci-pending PR which CI is running

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant