Skip to content

Sending fragments on sync writers <master> [6955]#1029

Merged
MiguelCompany merged 4 commits intomasterfrom
feature/fragments_on_sync_writers_master
Feb 25, 2020
Merged

Sending fragments on sync writers <master> [6955]#1029
MiguelCompany merged 4 commits intomasterfrom
feature/fragments_on_sync_writers_master

Conversation

@IkerLuengo
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@IkerLuengo IkerLuengo commented Feb 24, 2020

This is a port of #898 and #902 from 1.9.x

@richiware
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Build status:

  • Linux Build Status
  • Mac Build Status
  • Windows Build Status

MiguelCompany
MiguelCompany previously approved these changes Feb 25, 2020
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@MiguelCompany MiguelCompany left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@richiware
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Build status:

  • Linux Build Status
  • Mac Build Status
  • Windows Build Status

This is a port of #898 from 1.9.x

* ref [#6830] Modify tests sending fragments over sync

* ref [#6830] statelessWriter to send fragments when sync

* ref[#6830] statefulWriter to send fragments when sync
This casuistry is not currently supported
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@MiguelCompany MiguelCompany left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@richiware
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

richiware commented Feb 25, 2020

Build status:

  • Linux Build Status
  • Mac Build Status
  • Windows Build Status
    • Failed test is not related as it does not send fragments.

@MiguelCompany MiguelCompany merged commit e1ffdc3 into master Feb 25, 2020
@MiguelCompany MiguelCompany deleted the feature/fragments_on_sync_writers_master branch February 25, 2020 13:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants