Skip to content

chore(ci): workflow surface cleanup (Phase 0 B-bundle)#292

Merged
github-actions[bot] merged 1 commit into
developfrom
chore/workflow-surface-cleanup
Jun 9, 2026
Merged

chore(ci): workflow surface cleanup (Phase 0 B-bundle)#292
github-actions[bot] merged 1 commit into
developfrom
chore/workflow-surface-cleanup

Conversation

@tomymaritano

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

Phase 0 B-bundle of the post-audit roadmap. Six independent fixes batched into one PR because they all touch the workflow YAML surface and reviewing them together is faster than three ping-pong PRs that all conflict on the same files.

docs.yml

Change Why
`pnpm install` → `pnpm install --filter '@readied/web...' --ignore-scripts` Marketing-site install was the last workflow still firing apps/desktop's `electron-builder install-app-deps` step that fails on Linux + Node 22. Same shape as #287 (deploy-api) and #288 (release).
Added `permissions: contents: read` Cloudflare Pages deploy doesn't need anything beyond checkout
Build step moved into `working-directory: apps/web` Was inline `cd apps/web && ...` — explicit working-directory reads better

build.yml

Change Why
`windows-latest` → `windows-2025-vs2026` GitHub announced `windows-latest` migration to that image on 2026-06-15 (6 days from this commit). Pinning ahead avoids a surprise toolchain swap mid-release.
Removed `FORCE_JAVASCRIPT_ACTIONS_TO_NODE24: true` env This was the migration toggle for the Node 20→24 actions rollout. With all actions now on @v5 (Node 24-native) it's no-op.
Artifact upload `if-no-files-found: ignore` → `error` Silent zero-asset releases are worse than a failed upload. If electron-builder swallowed an error, signing failed, working-directory drifted, etc., we want loud failure here, not a release un-drafted with no installers.

release.yml

Change Why
Removed `HUSKY: '0'` env Leftover from the husky → lefthook migration in #267. Lefthook only reads .git/hooks if those files exist; on fresh CI clones they don't.

deploy-api.yml

Change Why
Added `permissions: contents: read` Cloudflare deploy doesn't push commits or create issues; minimum-privilege default.

Action versions sweep (all 8 workflows)

From To
`actions/checkout@v4` `@v5`
`actions/setup-node@v4` `@v5`
`actions/cache@v4` `@v5`
`actions/cache/save@v4` `@v5`
`actions/cache/restore@v4` `@v5`
`actions/upload-artifact@v4` `@v5`

GitHub announced Node 20-based actions deprecation on 2026-06-16 (7 days from this commit). The `@v5` family runs on Node 24.

Verification

  • ✅ `pnpm -r typecheck` — green
  • ✅ `pnpm test` — 17/17 (untouched)
  • ✅ YAML parsed locally; no syntax errors

Stack context

Phase 0 B-bundle. Pairs with #290 (A1 electron pin) and #291 (A2 bump-version). Independent files, can land in any order.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Jun 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
readide Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jun 9, 2026 2:00pm

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@tomymaritano, we couldn't start this review because you've reached your PR review rate limit.

More reviews will be available in 2 minutes and 44 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work.

Your organization has run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available.

Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: dce6f5c1-b0af-43c9-9877-99b93e36939b

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f5adb62 and 1977d50.

📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • .github/workflows/build.yml
  • .github/workflows/ci.yml
  • .github/workflows/codeql.yml
  • .github/workflows/deploy-api.yml
  • .github/workflows/docs.yml
  • .github/workflows/release.yml
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch chore/workflow-surface-cleanup

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@github-actions github-actions Bot enabled auto-merge (squash) June 9, 2026 13:07
github-actions Bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 9, 2026
…se 0 A4) (#293)

## Summary

Phase 0 A4. Two guardrails on \`release.yml\` to make a silent or
partial release impossible.

## Why

The v0.15.0 release pipeline failed silently twice:

1. **Silent no-op**: PR #245's squash-merge title (\`release: audit +
Ed25519 signed envelopes + lefthook (v0.15.0) (#245)\`) didn't match a
conventional commit type in \`releaseRules\`. semantic-release exited
cleanly with \"no release\" and the workflow ended green; the operator
only noticed because no tag appeared. We patched this with #289 by
adding a forcing \`feat:\` commit, but the trap will fire again on the
next big squash unless the workflow refuses to silently no-op.
2. **Stale version**: even when the release finally cut, both
\`package.json\` files still read \`0.14.0\` because the deleted
\`scripts/bump-version.js\` was never re-introduced (fixed in PR #291).
Tag points at one version, file content reads another — visible by
anyone running \`jq .version package.json\` against the tag.

## Guardrails

### Pre-flight (dry-run)

\`\`\`yaml
- name: Pre-flight (dry-run) check
  run: |
    npx semantic-release --dry-run 2>&1 | tee /tmp/sr-dry.log
    if grep -qE \"There are no relevant changes\" /tmp/sr-dry.log; then
echo \"::error::semantic-release dry-run: no release will be cut.\"
      exit 1
    fi
    if ! grep -qE \"next release version is\" /tmp/sr-dry.log; then
echo \"::error::semantic-release dry-run did not announce a next release
version.\"
      exit 1
    fi
\`\`\`

Stops the workflow loud and clear before \`--ci\` if commit-analyzer
would have returned \"no release\". Actionable error messages point at
\`release.config.js > releaseRules\` and the commit log.

### Post-flight (version assertion)

\`\`\`yaml
- name: Verify version bump applied
  run: |
expected=$(grep -oE \"next release version is [0-9]+\\.[0-9]+\\.[0-9]+\"
/tmp/sr-dry.log | tail -n 1 | awk '{print $NF}')
    root_v=$(jq -r .version package.json)
    desk_v=$(jq -r .version apps/desktop/package.json)
if [ \"$root_v\" != \"$expected\" ] || [ \"$desk_v\" != \"$expected\" ];
then
      echo \"::error::Version mismatch after semantic-release.\"
      exit 1
    fi
\`\`\`

Re-uses the captured dry-run log to know what version SHOULD have been
written. Catches a misconfigured or skipped \`scripts/bump-version.mjs\`
(PR #291) BEFORE the tag-triggered build downloads the stale
package.json.

## What gets caught

| Trap | Caught by |
|---|---|
| Non-conventional PR title (#245 trap) | Pre-flight: \"no relevant
changes\" |
| Wrong releaseRules / type filter | Pre-flight: \"did not announce next
release\" |
| \`prepareCmd\` missing or wrong path | Post-flight: version mismatch |
| \`bump-version.mjs\` only updated one file | Post-flight: per-file
diff |
| semantic-release crashed mid-cycle | Native exit code from \`Run
semantic-release\` step |

## Verification

I dry-ran the gate logic locally against the current main commit log;
the dry-run output contains the expected lines for both happy-path and
no-op cases. No way to test end-to-end without actually invoking the
workflow.

## Stack context

Phase 0 A4. Independent from A1 (#290), A2 (#291), B-bundle (#292).
Different files / steps; no overlapping changes.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
github-actions Bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 9, 2026
## Why

develop's lint job has been failing since **2026-04-24** (over a month).
Until this lands, **every Phase 0 PR (#290#294) is structurally
unmergeable** because branch protection requires \`lint\` to pass and
\`strict: true\` requires PRs to match develop's tip.

This is the unblock for the whole post-audit release stack.

## What

Two orthogonal fixes that together get \`pnpm lint\` to **0 errors**.

### 1. \`preserve-caught-error\` × 4 in \`encryptionService.ts\`

Four \`try/catch\` blocks re-throw a wrapped error without attaching the
caught one:

\`\`\`ts
} catch (error) {
  throw new Error(
\`Failed to encrypt content: \${error instanceof Error ? error.message :
'Unknown error'}\`,
+    { cause: error }  // ← lints clean and preserves the stack
  );
}
\`\`\`

Affected throw sites: \`initialize\` (114), \`encrypt\` (261),
\`decrypt\` (292), \`importKey\` (351). The \`{ cause }\` payload is the
standard ES2022 way to chain errors; runtime semantics unchanged.

### 2. mcp-server tsconfig refactor for ESLint projectService

\`packages/mcp-server/tsconfig.json\` was excluding \`src/__tests__\`.
ESLint uses \`@typescript-eslint/parser\` with \`projectService: true\`,
which delegates project discovery to the TypeScript LSP. The LSP walked
up from the test file, found mcp-server/tsconfig.json with the explicit
exclude, and rejected the test → **parsing error: \"was not found by the
project service\"**.

Fix: split build vs editor configs.

- **tsconfig.json** — single source of truth for editors/lint/test.
Includes everything under \`src\`. Adds \`vitest/globals\` to \`types\`.
- **tsconfig.build.json** — extends tsconfig.json, re-adds \`exclude:
[\"src/__tests__\"]\`. Used by the build script.
- **package.json** — \`\"build\": \"tsc\"\` → \`\"build\": \"tsc -p
tsconfig.build.json\"\`.

Confirmed locally:
- \`pnpm lint\` → 0 errors (39 warnings unchanged, all pre-existing
import-x/order).
- \`pnpm --filter @readied/mcp-server build\` succeeds;
\`dist/__tests__/\` does not exist.
- \`pnpm --filter @readied/mcp-server test\` → 5/5 pass.
- \`pnpm -r typecheck\` succeeds.

## Why a separate PR (not bundled with #290 / A1)

A1 is the Electron-pin commit. Mixing in a multi-file lint fix would
muddy what's a release-pipeline change vs a code-hygiene change. Keeping
this separate also means: this PR can go in first, then #290#294 can
rebase one by one and pass CI cleanly.

## Roadmap status

- [ ] **this PR** — lint baseline unblock
- [ ] #290 A1 (electron 41.7.1)
- [ ] #291 A2 (bump-version.mjs)
- [ ] #292 B (workflow surface)
- [ ] #293 A4 (release guardrails)
- [ ] #294 C1 (pr-title commitlint)
- [ ] C2 follow-up — add \`commitlint\` to required checks after #294
lands
- [ ] D — cut v0.15.1
@tomymaritano tomymaritano force-pushed the chore/workflow-surface-cleanup branch from fb4fbfa to d5e4528 Compare June 9, 2026 13:42
github-actions Bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 9, 2026
## Why

Phase 0 **C1** of the DevOps cleanup roadmap. After v0.15.0 traced back
to PR #245's squash-merge producing a non-conventional commit message
(`release: audit...`) which semantic-release silently rejected, the
merge gate needs to block non-conventional PR titles **upstream of
merge** — not just whine in CI.

The check already existed as a step inside `ci.yml`'s `lint` job, but it
shipped as a sub-step of a multi-purpose job. Branch protection can only
require whole status checks, so requiring \`lint\` would also block on
ESLint/Prettier failures. Pulling commitlint into its own workflow gives
branch protection a clean, single-responsibility check name to require:
\`PR title / commitlint\`.

## What changes

- **New: \`.github/workflows/pr-title.yml\`** — runs commitlint against
\`github.event.pull_request.title\` on pull_request \`opened\`,
\`edited\`, \`reopened\`, \`synchronize\`.
- **\`ci.yml\`** — drops the duplicated step from the \`lint\` job and
leaves a one-line breadcrumb pointing at the new workflow.

## Security shape

The workflow follows the [GitHub command-injection
guidance](https://github.blog/security/vulnerability-research/how-to-catch-github-actions-workflow-injections-before-attackers-do/):

- \`github.event.pull_request.title\` is **never** interpolated directly
into a \`run:\` script. It passes through \`env:\` as \`PR_TITLE\` and
the shell reads \`\$PR_TITLE\` from the process environment.
- The script uses \`printf '%s' "\$PR_TITLE" | pnpm commitlint\` instead
of \`echo\` — a PR title beginning with \`-e\` or \`-n\` would otherwise
be treated as an echo flag in bash/sh.

## Verification

- \`pnpm commitlint --config commitlint.config.js\` on the local
checkout exits non-zero for \`release: foo\`, \`hotfix: foo\`, \`Add
feature\`; zero for \`feat: foo\`, \`fix(scope): foo\`, \`chore!: foo\`.
- Type enum used: \`feat | fix | refactor | docs | test | chore | style
| perf | ci | build | revert\` (sourced from \`commitlint.config.js\`).

## Follow-ups (Phase 0 C2)

Once this merges, **C2** sets \`PR title / commitlint\` as a required
status check on \`develop\` and \`main\` via \`gh api\` — that's the
step that actually blocks #245-style merges. C1 is the pre-req: required
checks must exist on the default branch before they can be required.

## Roadmap status

- [x] A1 #290 — electron 41.7.1 pin
- [x] A2 #291 — \`scripts/bump-version.mjs\` + release.config.js wire
- [x] B   #292 — workflow surface cleanup
- [x] A4 #293 — release dry-run + version-assertion guardrails
- [x] **C1 (this PR)** — PR-title commitlint standalone
- [ ] C2 — branch protection \`gh api\` (next)
- [ ] D  — cut v0.15.1
github-actions Bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 9, 2026
…postinstall in setup (#296)

## Why

Two distinct CI issues, both blocking every Phase 0 PR (#290, #292,
#294). Bundling them is OK because they're orthogonal-but-related: both
clear a "lint-or-setup says no, so I can't merge" path on develop.

### Issue 1: Prettier fails on \`CHANGELOG.md\`

semantic-release writes CHANGELOG entries without prettier formatting.
The root \`format:check\` script uses \`--ignore-path .gitignore\`,
which **overrides** Prettier's default \`.prettierignore\` lookup.
CHANGELOG.md correctly isn't gitignored (it's tracked), so it gets
linted, fails, kills lint.

### Issue 2: \`setup\` job fails when native deps don't match the host
Electron

\`setup\` runs \`pnpm install --frozen-lockfile\` (no
\`--ignore-scripts\`). That triggers apps/desktop's \`electron-builder
install-app-deps\` postinstall, which **rebuilds better-sqlite3 from
source against Electron's bundled Node headers**. When better-sqlite3
lags an Electron major (the v0.15.0 incident: Electron 42 +
better-sqlite3 12.10.0, V8 \`External::Value\` signature mismatch), the
rebuild fails and setup dies — taking lint/test/typecheck/build down
with it.

The same shape took down deploy-api.yml (#287) and release.yml (#288).
This brings ci.yml in line.

## What changes

- **\`.prettierignore\`** (new) — CHANGELOG.md + local build artefacts
(.next/, .source/, .astro/, .wrangler/, dist/, out/, release/,
coverage/, pnpm-lock.yaml).
- **\`package.json\`** — \`format\` and \`format:check\` now pass
\`--ignore-path .gitignore --ignore-path .prettierignore\` (Prettier 3.x
supports repeated \`--ignore-path\`).
- **\`.github/workflows/ci.yml\`** — \`setup\` job install:
\`--ignore-scripts\` added with explanatory comment.

## Verification

- \`pnpm format:check\` locally → "All matched files use Prettier code
style!"
- CI doesn't need a runtime-functional better-sqlite3: lint and
typecheck don't load native modules, and \`pnpm test\` excludes
storage-sqlite per CLAUDE.md.

## Order of operations

After this lands → rebase #290 / #292 / #294 → CI green → merge them in
order → cut v0.15.1.
@tomymaritano tomymaritano force-pushed the chore/workflow-surface-cleanup branch from d5e4528 to d1274f0 Compare June 9, 2026 13:54
Six independent fixes batched into one PR because they all touch the
workflow YAML surface and reviewing them together is faster than three
ping-pong PRs that all conflict on the same files.

docs.yml: pnpm install scoped to @readied/web with --ignore-scripts
(same shape as #287, #288). Added permissions block. Moved Build step
into working-directory: apps/web.

build.yml: windows-latest pinned to windows-2025-vs2026 ahead of the
2026-06-15 GitHub image migration. Removed FORCE_JAVASCRIPT_ACTIONS_TO_NODE24
env (no-op with @v5 actions). Artifact upload if-no-files-found changed
from ignore to error so silent zero-asset releases fail loud.

release.yml: removed HUSKY=0 env leftover from husky->lefthook migration.

deploy-api.yml: added permissions block contents:read.

Action versions across 8 workflows bumped @v4 to @v5
(checkout, setup-node, cache, cache/save, cache/restore, upload-artifact).
GitHub announced Node 20-based actions deprecation on 2026-06-16.

Verified: pnpm -r typecheck green, no test changes.

Phase 0 B-bundle. Pairs with PR-A1 electron pin and PR-A2 bump-version.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@tomymaritano tomymaritano force-pushed the chore/workflow-surface-cleanup branch from d1274f0 to 1977d50 Compare June 9, 2026 13:57
@github-actions github-actions Bot merged commit 57895f0 into develop Jun 9, 2026
15 of 17 checks passed
tomymaritano added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 9, 2026
## Release v0.15.1 — Phase 0 DevOps stabilization

Brings the 7-PR DevOps cleanup chain to main and cuts a clean release.
This is the verification gate for the whole Phase 0 effort — if anything
breaks at tag, build, or publish, Phase 0 isn't done.

### What landed since v0.15.0

| PR | Phase | Summary |
|----|-------|---------|
| #290 | **A1** | \`fix(desktop)\`: pin Electron to ^41.7.1 so
better-sqlite3 prebuilts apply (closes the v0.15.0 V8 ABI failure on all
3 build platforms) |
| #291 | **A2** | \`fix(release)\`: restore version bumping via
\`scripts/bump-version.mjs\` + \`@semantic-release/exec\` (closes the
"tag at 0.14.0" trap) |
| #292 | **B** | \`chore(ci)\`: workflow surface cleanup — actions
@v4@v5 sweep, \`windows-latest\` → \`windows-2025-vs2026\` pin, drop
\`FORCE_JAVASCRIPT_ACTIONS_TO_NODE24\`, \`if-no-files-found: error\`,
\`permissions:\` blocks, HUSKY: '0' removal |
| #293 | **A4** | \`chore(ci)\`: \`release.yml\` pre-flight dry-run gate
+ post-flight version assertion (closes the "silent no-release" trap) |
| #294 | **C1** | \`ci\`: PR-title commitlint as a standalone workflow →
required check on develop + main |
| #295 | | \`fix(lint)\`: develop lint baseline (preserve-caught-error ×
4 in encryptionService + mcp-server tsconfig split for ESLint
projectService) |
| #296 | | \`chore(ci)\`: unblock CI on develop — ignore CHANGELOG.md in
Prettier (semantic-release writes it), \`pnpm install --ignore-scripts\`
in setup job (same shape as release.yml + deploy-api.yml) |

### C2 — branch protection updates (already applied via gh api)

Both \`develop\` and \`main\`:
- **Required status checks**: \`lint\`, \`test\`, \`typecheck\`,
\`CodeRabbit\`, \`commitlint\`
- Force-pushes blocked
- \`strict: true\` (PRs must be up to date)

### Release pipeline guardrails now in place

- **Pre-merge**: PR-title commitlint blocks \`release:\`-style
non-conventional squash titles upstream.
- **Mid-release**: \`release.yml\` dry-run check fails loud if no
release would be cut. \`scripts/bump-version.mjs\` mutates both
\`package.json\` files. Post-flight assertion verifies both match the
dry-run-announced version.
- **Post-release**: \`build.yml\` artifact upload uses
\`if-no-files-found: error\` (silent zero-asset releases die at upload).
- **Native deps**: \`apps/desktop\` pinned to Electron 41.7.1 with
prebuilt better-sqlite3. CI \`setup\` skips postinstall so workflow-side
install never rebuilds native modules.

### Expected behavior of the Release pipeline after merge

1. Merge this PR → main tip advances.
2. Manually dispatch the **Release** workflow.
3. \`release.yml\` runs:
- \`pnpm install --ignore-scripts\` (no native rebuild needed for
semantic-release).
- **Pre-flight dry-run** → "next release version is 0.15.1" (single
\`fix(release):\` commit since v0.15.0).
   - \`npx semantic-release\`:
- \`@semantic-release/exec\` runs \`node scripts/bump-version.mjs
0.15.1\` → both package.json files updated.
     - \`@semantic-release/git\` commits + pushes tag \`v0.15.1\`.
     - \`@semantic-release/github\` creates draft Release.
   - **Post-flight assertion** → both package.jsons read \`0.15.1\`.
4. Tag push triggers \`build.yml\` on macOS-14, windows-2025-vs2026,
ubuntu-latest.
5. All 3 platforms succeed → publish job un-drafts the GitHub Release.
6. Auto-sync PR opens to merge main → develop.

### What still needs verification (post-release)

- [ ] Tag push actually triggers Build (needs GH_TOKEN with workflow
scope — A3 deferred, may need PAT regen)
- [ ] Build completes on all 3 platforms with prebuilt better-sqlite3
(smoke-test desktop bundle after publish)
- [ ] Auto-sync PR back to develop is created

🤖 This is the Phase 0 verification gate. Mobile + Plugin Marketplace UI
remain deferred.

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **New Features**
* Added PR title validation workflow for automated commit message
compliance checks.

* **Bug Fixes**
  * Enhanced error diagnostics in encryption operations.
* Added pre-flight checks to release process to prevent failed
deployments.
  * Stricter artifact validation in builds.

* **Chores**
  * Updated GitHub Actions to latest stable versions.
  * Improved code formatting configuration and build scripts.
  * Adjusted Electron dependency version.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->

---------

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant