Skip to content

Conversation

@MichalStrehovsky
Copy link
Member

Based on measurements on the ASP.NET perf infra (BasicWebApi and TodosApi), using the GuardCF libraries in non-guard context doesn't have measurable impact on throughput. The impact on size is negligible. We can just have it enabled unconditionally on the native runtime bits.

Cc @dotnet/ilc-contrib

Based on measurements on the ASP.NET perf infra (BasicWebApi and TodosApi), using the GuardCF libraries in non-guard context doesn't have measurable impact on throughput. The impact on size is negligible. We can just have it enabled unconditionally on the native runtime bits.
@dotnet-policy-service
Copy link
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @MichalStrehovsky, @jkotas
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@MichalStrehovsky MichalStrehovsky merged commit 7927a19 into dotnet:main Dec 13, 2024
152 of 156 checks passed
@MichalStrehovsky MichalStrehovsky deleted the easycfg branch December 13, 2024 05:39
hez2010 pushed a commit to hez2010/runtime that referenced this pull request Dec 14, 2024
Based on measurements on the ASP.NET perf infra (BasicWebApi and TodosApi), using the GuardCF libraries in non-guard context doesn't have measurable impact on throughput. The impact on size is negligible. We can just have it enabled unconditionally on the native runtime bits.
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 12, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants