Docs Build status updates of commit 1fe83c3:

⚠️ Validation status: warnings

This comment lists only the first 50 files in the pull request.

xml/System.Reflection/CustomAttributeExtensions.xml

• Line 0, Column 0: [Warning: ECMA2Yaml_UidAssembly_NotMatched] System.Reflection.CustomAttributeExtensions's moniker windowsdesktop-5.0 can't match any assembly.

xml/System.Reflection/RuntimeReflectionExtensions.xml

• Line 0, Column 0: [Warning: ECMA2Yaml_UidAssembly_NotMatched] System.Reflection.RuntimeReflectionExtensions's moniker windowsdesktop-5.0 can't match any assembly.

xml/System.Runtime.InteropServices/CriticalHandle.xml

• Line 0, Column 0: [Warning: ECMA2Yaml_UidAssembly_NotMatched] System.Runtime.InteropServices.CriticalHandle's moniker netstandard-1.5 can't match any assembly.

xml/System.Runtime.InteropServices/SafeHandle.xml

• Line 0, Column 0: [Warning: ECMA2Yaml_UidAssembly_NotMatched] System.Runtime.InteropServices.SafeHandle's moniker netstandard-1.5 can't match any assembly.

xml/System.Security.Policy/Evidence.xml

• Line 0, Column 0: [Warning: ECMA2Yaml_UidAssembly_NotMatched] System.Security.Policy.Evidence's moniker dotnet-plat-ext-6.0 can't match any assembly.

xml/System/HashCode.xml

• Line 0, Column 0: [Warning: ECMA2Yaml_UidAssembly_NotMatched] System.HashCode's moniker dotnet-plat-ext-3.0 can't match any assembly.
• Line 0, Column 0: [Warning: ECMA2Yaml_UidAssembly_NotMatched] System.HashCode's moniker dotnet-plat-ext-3.1 can't match any assembly.
• Line 0, Column 0: [Warning: ECMA2Yaml_UidAssembly_NotMatched] System.HashCode's moniker dotnet-plat-ext-5.0 can't match any assembly.

xml/System.Threading/Timer.xml

• Line 0, Column 0: [Suggestion: disallowed-html-tag - See documentation] HTML tag 'see' isn't allowed. Replace it with approved Markdown or escape the brackets if the content is a placeholder.
• Line 0, Column 0: [Suggestion: disallowed-html-tag - See documentation] HTML tag 'see' isn't allowed. Replace it with approved Markdown or escape the brackets if the content is a placeholder.

For more details, please refer to the build report.

If you see build warnings/errors with permission issues, it might be due to single sign-on (SSO) enabled on Microsoft's GitHub organizations. Please follow instructions here to re-authorize your GitHub account to Docs Build.

Note: Broken links written as relative paths are included in the above build report. For broken links written as absolute paths or external URLs, see the broken link report.

Note: Your PR may contain errors or warnings unrelated to the files you changed. This happens when external dependencies like GitHub alias, Microsoft alias, cross repo links are updated. Please use these instructions to resolve them.

For any questions, please:

• Try searching the docs.microsoft.com contributor guides
• Post your question in the Docs support channel

This refresh includes the following key changes:

* Exclude source generator APIs

Why? People use these apis, why not keem them documented here.

* Add assemblies for 3 assemblies where previously they were omitted (System.Numerics.Vectors.dll, System.IO.Compression.Brotli.dll, System.Formats.Cbor.dll)

Did you mean to word this as Add 3 assemblies that where previously omitted?

* Add System.Runtime.dll assembly from the System.Runtime.Experimental package to the extensions moniker

I wonder why there is no net-experimental tfm instead of needing to reference them by packages which would then always reference the experimental versions of the runtimes for .NET vNext.

This refresh includes the following key changes:

* Exclude source generator APIs

Why? People use these apis, why not keem them documented here.

This means to exclude the public APIs in the library that implements the source generator itself. No one calls into the source generator library - just the compiler. External developers don't call methods on the JsonSourceGenerator class.

Did you mean to word this as Add 3 assemblies that where previously omitted?

Yes, I did. I've updated it, thanks.

Two interesting things to note for types like Char:

• Syntax block is crowded now:

  

• It shows as being applicable to the .NET platform extensions moniker (this is due to the version of System.Runtime.dll that's in the System.Runtime.Experimental package). Are we okay with this? Or should I try to fix it somehow?

  

Syntax block is crowded now:

Notably, the type only directly implements:

public readonly struct Char : IComparable, IComparable<char>, IEquatable<char>, IConvertible, ISpanFormattable
#if FEATURE_GENERIC_MATH
        , IBinaryInteger<char>,
          IMinMaxValue<char>,
          IUnsignedNumber<char>
#endif // FEATURE_GENERIC_MATH

I wonder if there would be some benefit to not displaying the transitive closure in the block here and instead only showing the "top level" set of interfaces. The transitive closure could then be displayed elsewhere...

Notably, we also get:

Where those TSelf and TOther are actually Char. Likewise, this list is much bigger than strictly necessary. Most of the interfaces listed are "indirectly" implemented and perhaps we could have Implements and Indirectly Implements or something?

Closing in favor of #7387