Skip to content

Relax PublishArtifactInManifest safety check (#4682)#5709

Merged
riarenas merged 1 commit intodotnet:release/3.xfrom
riarenas:riarenas/relax-stable-publishing-3.x
Jun 25, 2020
Merged

Relax PublishArtifactInManifest safety check (#4682)#5709
riarenas merged 1 commit intodotnet:release/3.xfrom
riarenas:riarenas/relax-stable-publishing-3.x

Conversation

@riarenas
Copy link
Contributor

This ports 0fcbdf1 to the release/3.x branch. It removes the safety checks around the publishing of stable assets to non-stable feeds.

The justification and servicing template are found in #5487

* Relax PublishArtifactInManifest safety check

* Remove validation of publishing stable assets to non-isolated feed.
@riarenas riarenas added the auto-merge Automatically merge PR once CI passes. label Jun 25, 2020
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jun 25, 2020

Hello @riarenas!

Because this pull request has the auto-merge label, I will be glad to assist with helping to merge this pull request once all check-in policies pass.

p.s. you can customize the way I help with merging this pull request, such as holding this pull request until a specific person approves. Simply @mention me (@msftbot) and give me an instruction to get started! Learn more here.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jun 25, 2020

Apologies, while this PR appears ready to be merged, it looks like release/3.x is a protected branch and I have not been granted permission to perform the merge.

@riarenas riarenas merged commit e9a3fdd into dotnet:release/3.x Jun 25, 2020
@riarenas riarenas deleted the riarenas/relax-stable-publishing-3.x branch June 25, 2020 19:17
@brettfo
Copy link
Member

brettfo commented Jul 17, 2020

dotnet/interactive builds are still failing with Package 'Microsoft.dotnet-interactive' has stable version '1.0.136701' but is targeted at a non-isolated feed '...'. (build) That repo is currently using Arcade version 1.0.0-beta.20365.6 which appears to be the latest from the release/3.x branch. The targeted feed is .NET Core Tooling Dev.

Should we be publishing to a different channel? I've temporarily removed that channel and re-ran the failed job to unblock our builds.

@riarenas
Copy link
Contributor Author

hmm, I wonder if the release/3.x branch requires a manual update to the task version. Checking

@riarenas
Copy link
Contributor Author

yeah, that's the reason. I'll put out a PR to update the task version shortly

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

auto-merge Automatically merge PR once CI passes.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants