Skip to content

Conversation

@njzjz
Copy link
Member

@njzjz njzjz commented Feb 27, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation

    • Added a new citation for the "DeePMD-kit v3" article in various documentation files.
    • Clarified references to distinguish between the "v2" and "v3" publications.
    • Enhanced bibliography and credits details for improved clarity.
  • Chores

    • Revised citation formatting across the package to reflect formal publication standards.

Signed-off-by: Jinzhe Zeng <jinzhe.zeng@ustc.edu.cn>
Signed-off-by: Jinzhe Zeng <jinzhe.zeng@ustc.edu.cn>
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings February 27, 2025 04:24
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

PR Overview

This PR updates documentation by adding the v3 paper citations for DeePMD-kit. It provides an additional citation entry in the summary module and updates the README with the new v3 citation information.

  • Added v3 paper citation reference in deepmd/utils/summary.py.
  • Included the v3 paper citation in README.md along with a labeling update for the v2 paper.
  • Updated links in README.md to reference the new v3 citation.

Reviewed Changes

File Description
deepmd/utils/summary.py Added new v3 paper citation entry to the citation list.
README.md Added new v3 citation information and reworded the v2 reference.

Copilot reviewed 6 out of 6 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

README.md:80

  • The v3 paper citation contains an incorrect DOI link; update it to the correct arXiv URL (e.g., https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.19161) to accurately reference the v3 paper.
See [our v3 paper](https://doi.org/5.0155600) for details of all features until v3.0.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 27, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This update integrates a new citation for the DeePMD-kit v3 article by Zeng et al. across multiple documentation and source files. The changes add a new article entry with complete bibliographic details in the bibliography file, update reference texts in the README, and append the new citation to the citation tuple in the summary utility. Additionally, modifications in several source files change the citation type from @misc to @article for a 2023 entry and add a corresponding 2025 entry. A redundant line in the credits document has also been removed.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
CITATIONS.bib Added new article entry @article{Zeng_arXiv_2025_p2502.19161} with fields: annote, author, title, journal, year, pages, and doi.
README.md Added a new citation for the DeePMD-kit v3 paper, updated reference text from "latest paper" to "v2 paper," and introduced a new "v3 paper" reference.
deepmd/utils/summary.py Appended "Zeng et al, arxiv:2502.19161" to the CITATION tuple in the SummaryPrinter class.
doc/credits.rst Added bibliography entry Zeng_arXiv_2025_p2502.19161 and removed the line beginning with "If GPU version is used,".
source/lmp/pair_deepmd.cpp, source/lmp/pair_deepspin.cpp Updated citation entry for the 2023 paper from @misc to @article and added a new citation entry @Article{Zeng_arXiv_2025_p2502.19161}.

Possibly related PRs

  • docs: document plugin mechanisms and deepmd-gnn #4345: The changes in the main PR, which involve adding a new citation entry for a paper by Jinzhe Zeng, are related to the modifications in the retrieved PR that also include updates to citations in the README.md file, specifically referencing the same paper.
  • docs: update DPA-2 citation #4483: The changes in the main PR, which involve adding a new citation for a 2025 article by Jinzhe Zeng, are related to the retrieved PR that updates citations in the documentation, as both involve modifications to citation entries for works authored by Zeng.

Suggested reviewers

  • iProzd
  • wanghan-iapcm

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 80570dc and 8c97c4d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • README.md
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (20)
  • GitHub Check: Test Python (4, 3.9)
  • GitHub Check: Test Python (2, 3.9)
  • GitHub Check: Test Python (5, 3.9)
  • GitHub Check: Test Python (3, 3.12)
  • GitHub Check: Build wheels for cp310-manylinux_aarch64
  • GitHub Check: Test Python (1, 3.12)
  • GitHub Check: Build wheels for cp311-macosx_arm64
  • GitHub Check: Build wheels for cp311-macosx_x86_64
  • GitHub Check: Build wheels for cp311-manylinux_x86_64
  • GitHub Check: Build wheels for cp311-manylinux_x86_64
  • GitHub Check: Test C++ (false)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (python)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
  • GitHub Check: Test C++ (true)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (c-cpp)
  • GitHub Check: Build C++ (clang, clang)
  • GitHub Check: Build C++ (cuda120, cuda)
  • GitHub Check: Build C++ (cuda, cuda)
  • GitHub Check: Build C++ (rocm, rocm)
  • GitHub Check: Build C++ (cpu, cpu)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 47bbd65 and 80570dc.

📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • CITATIONS.bib (1 hunks)
  • README.md (2 hunks)
  • deepmd/utils/summary.py (1 hunks)
  • doc/credits.rst (1 hunks)
  • source/lmp/pair_deepmd.cpp (2 hunks)
  • source/lmp/pair_deepspin.cpp (2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
  • deepmd/utils/summary.py
  • source/lmp/pair_deepmd.cpp
  • source/lmp/pair_deepspin.cpp
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (20)
  • GitHub Check: Build wheels for cp310-manylinux_aarch64
  • GitHub Check: Build wheels for cp311-manylinux_x86_64
  • GitHub Check: Build C++ (clang, clang)
  • GitHub Check: Build wheels for cp311-win_amd64
  • GitHub Check: Build wheels for cp311-macosx_arm64
  • GitHub Check: Test Python (5, 3.9)
  • GitHub Check: Test Python (3, 3.9)
  • GitHub Check: Test Python (6, 3.9)
  • GitHub Check: Test Python (6, 3.12)
  • GitHub Check: Build wheels for cp311-macosx_x86_64
  • GitHub Check: Build wheels for cp311-manylinux_x86_64
  • GitHub Check: Test Python (5, 3.12)
  • GitHub Check: Test Python (3, 3.12)
  • GitHub Check: Test C++ (true)
  • GitHub Check: Test Python (1, 3.12)
  • GitHub Check: Test C++ (false)
  • GitHub Check: Test Python (2, 3.12)
  • GitHub Check: Test Python (2, 3.9)
  • GitHub Check: Build C library (2.18, libdeepmd_c.tar.gz)
  • GitHub Check: Test Python (1, 3.9)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
doc/credits.rst (1)

16-16: Citation correctly added for v3 paper.

The new bibliography entry for the v3 paper has been properly added to the document.

CITATIONS.bib (1)

43-66: Citation entry properly formatted and complete.

The new citation entry for the DeePMD-kit v3 paper is well-structured with all required fields (author, title, journal, year, pages, DOI) and follows the same formatting style as other entries in the file.

README.md (2)

39-39: DeePMD-kit v3 citation correctly added.

The citation for the v3 paper has been properly added with complete author list and arXiv reference.


72-72: Reference text updated appropriately.

Changed "our latest paper" to "our v2 paper" which is more specific and future-proof.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 27, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 84.58%. Comparing base (47bbd65) to head (8c97c4d).
Report is 73 commits behind head on devel.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##            devel    #4619      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   84.58%   84.58%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         680      680              
  Lines       64544    64543       -1     
  Branches     3538     3539       +1     
==========================================
- Hits        54596    54595       -1     
  Misses       8807     8807              
  Partials     1141     1141              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@njzjz njzjz requested a review from wanghan-iapcm February 27, 2025 05:48
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Jinzhe Zeng <njzjz@qq.com>
@njzjz njzjz added this to the v3.0.2 milestone Feb 27, 2025
@wanghan-iapcm wanghan-iapcm added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 27, 2025
Merged via the queue into deepmodeling:devel with commit 918d4de Feb 27, 2025
60 checks passed
njzjz added a commit to njzjz/deepmd-kit that referenced this pull request Mar 1, 2025
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **Documentation**
- Added a new citation for the "DeePMD-kit v3" article in various
documentation files.
- Clarified references to distinguish between the "v2" and "v3"
publications.
  - Enhanced bibliography and credits details for improved clarity.

- **Chores**
- Revised citation formatting across the package to reflect formal
publication standards.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->

---------

Signed-off-by: Jinzhe Zeng <jinzhe.zeng@ustc.edu.cn>
Signed-off-by: Jinzhe Zeng <njzjz@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
(cherry picked from commit 918d4de)
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Mar 1, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants