Skip to content

Add Proposals and Results Content Blocks in Process Groups#6822

Closed
entantoencuanto wants to merge 46 commits intodevelopfrom
feature/process_groups_improvements-proposals_and_results_content_blocks
Closed

Add Proposals and Results Content Blocks in Process Groups#6822
entantoencuanto wants to merge 46 commits intodevelopfrom
feature/process_groups_improvements-proposals_and_results_content_blocks

Conversation

@entantoencuanto
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🎩 What? Why?

  • Adds a generic content block to get higfhligted resources associated with components of a participatory space. In this case the space is a participatory process group
  • Defines and registers a content block for highlighted proposals of groups
  • Defines an m-size card for results in decidim-accountability
  • Defines and registers a content block for highlighted results of groups (using m-card)
  • Adds some system tests in participatory process group landing page

Note: This PR is built on top of feature/process_groups_improvements-cta_content_block, the branch of #6821 PR.

📌 Related Issues

Link your PR to an issue

Testing

Enable the 2 content blocks in a group landing page

📋 Checklist

🚨 Please review the guidelines for contributing to this repository.

  • CONSIDER adding a unit test if your PR resolves an issue.
  • ✔️ DO check open PR's to avoid duplicates.
  • ✔️ DO keep pull requests small so they can be easily reviewed.
  • ✔️ DO build locally before pushing.
  • ✔️ DO make sure tests pass.
  • ✔️ DO make sure any new changes are documented in docs/.
  • ✔️ DO add and modify seeds if necessary.
  • ✔️ DO add CHANGELOG upgrade notes if required.
  • ✔️ DO add to GraphQL API if there are new public fields.
  • ✔️ DO add link to MetaDecidim if it's a new feature.
  • AVOID breaking the continuous integration build.
  • AVOID making significant changes to the overall architecture.

📷 Screenshots

Please add screenshots of the changes you're proposing
Description

♥️ Thank you!

@entantoencuanto entantoencuanto force-pushed the feature/process_groups_improvements-proposals_and_results_content_blocks branch from 3503cae to 35ecb7e Compare November 10, 2020 16:05
border-right: $card-border;
border-right: 0;
border-bottom: $card-border;

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Don't leave trailing whitespace

border-right: $card-border;
border-right: 0;
border-bottom: $card-border;

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Unexpected whitespace at end of line (no-eol-whitespace)

@entantoencuanto entantoencuanto force-pushed the feature/process_groups_improvements-proposals_and_results_content_blocks branch from 35ecb7e to 7173595 Compare November 11, 2020 16:34
@entantoencuanto entantoencuanto marked this pull request as ready for review November 16, 2020 12:37
@andreslucena andreslucena changed the title Feature/process groups improvements proposals and results content blocks Add Proposals and Results Content Blocks in Process Groups Nov 17, 2020
The hashtag attribute has been moved to the metadata section in admin
form
This content block contains title, description, number of participatory
processes and hashtag, external url and meta scope if present
@entantoencuanto entantoencuanto force-pushed the feature/process_groups_improvements-proposals_and_results_content_blocks branch 2 times, most recently from d5907e7 to bfd3b25 Compare November 30, 2020 14:44
@entantoencuanto entantoencuanto force-pushed the feature/process_groups_improvements-proposals_and_results_content_blocks branch from bfd3b25 to 53b3db2 Compare November 30, 2020 19:10
@tramuntanal
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Closing, as changes in this PR were already in #6823 which is already merged

@tramuntanal tramuntanal closed this Dec 4, 2020
@tramuntanal tramuntanal deleted the feature/process_groups_improvements-proposals_and_results_content_blocks branch December 4, 2020 07:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Proposals and Results content block for Process Groups

3 participants