Skip to content

Proposed metaschema docs updates#50

Merged
david-waltermire merged 6 commits intodavid-waltermire:issue1066-metaschema-updatesfrom
wendellpiez:issue1066-metaschema-updatesA
Aug 12, 2022
Merged

Proposed metaschema docs updates#50
david-waltermire merged 6 commits intodavid-waltermire:issue1066-metaschema-updatesfrom
wendellpiez:issue1066-metaschema-updatesA

Conversation

@wendellpiez
Copy link

Committer Notes

Addresses usnistgov#1392.

Connects from there back to usnistgov#1263.

All Submissions:

Changes to Core Features:

  • Have you added an explanation of what your changes do and why you'd like us to include them?
  • Have you written new tests for your core changes, as applicable?
  • Have you included examples of how to use your new feature(s)?
  • Have you updated all OSCAL website and readme documentation affected by the changes you made? Changes to the OSCAL website can be made in the docs/content directory of your branch.

@david-waltermire david-waltermire force-pushed the issue1066-metaschema-updates branch from 7ed2bd2 to d05ed55 Compare August 1, 2022 16:01
@david-waltermire david-waltermire force-pushed the issue1066-metaschema-updatesA branch from c5cddb2 to ef16f20 Compare August 12, 2022 15:17
Comment on lines +118 to +122
<p>Whenever combining controls from multiple (import) pathways, an issue arises of what to do in cases of clashing invocations (which may be multiple competing versions of a control). </p>
<p>This setting permits a profile designer to apply a rule for the resolution of such cases. In a well-designed profile such collisions would ordinarily be avoided, but this setting can be useful for defining what to do when it occurs.</p>
<p>If no <code>combine</code> element appears, the default behavior is to treat the profile the same as one whose <code>combine</code> indicates a method of “keep”. In this case, controls are all kept (and not regarded as duplicative), leading to validation errors in the result if their IDs should happen to collide. This is easily detectable as an error condition.</p>
<p>Conversely, a profile with <code>combine="keep"</code> that shows no such control collisions in profile resolution, demonstrates thereby that no conflicting controls have been selected, even among sources that may be very similar in other respects (for example, as distinct profiles both derived from the same catalog).</p>
<p>Another setting for <code>combine</code>, "use-first", can be useful in specific situations. (The deprecated value "merge" represents a proposed use case not fully specified.)</p>
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We need to move these changes to a different branch that is based on develop, since this is based on main.

Adjustments based on model review feedback on 8/12.
Removed outdated merge phase remarks. Created issue #53 to address this.
Copy link
Owner

@david-waltermire david-waltermire left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@david-waltermire david-waltermire merged commit a8c12d9 into david-waltermire:issue1066-metaschema-updates Aug 12, 2022
@david-waltermire david-waltermire deleted the issue1066-metaschema-updatesA branch August 12, 2022 16:57
david-waltermire pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 19, 2022
* Feedback based on usnistgov#1392
* Adjustments based on model review feedback on 8/12.
* Removed outdated merge phase remarks. Created issue #53 to address this.

Co-authored-by: David Waltermire <david.waltermire@nist.gov>
david-waltermire pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 22, 2022
* Feedback based on usnistgov#1392
* Adjustments based on model review feedback on 8/12.
* Removed outdated merge phase remarks. Created issue #53 to address this.

Co-authored-by: David Waltermire <david.waltermire@nist.gov>
david-waltermire pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 23, 2022
* Feedback based on usnistgov#1392
* Adjustments based on model review feedback on 8/12.
* Removed outdated merge phase remarks. Created issue #53 to address this.

Co-authored-by: David Waltermire <david.waltermire@nist.gov>
david-waltermire pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 23, 2022
* Feedback based on usnistgov#1392
* Adjustments based on model review feedback on 8/12.
* Removed outdated merge phase remarks. Created issue #53 to address this.

Co-authored-by: David Waltermire <david.waltermire@nist.gov>
david-waltermire pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 26, 2022
* Feedback based on usnistgov#1392
* Adjustments based on model review feedback on 8/12.
* Removed outdated merge phase remarks. Created issue #53 to address this.

Co-authored-by: David Waltermire <david.waltermire@nist.gov>
david-waltermire pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2022
…1263)

* completed partial update of the Metadata object documentation.
* adjustments to roles
* adjusted the cardinality of location/address to make address optional.
* Improved documentation and constraints related to location and parties
* addressed the remainder of metadata and control feedback from @Rene2mt.
* Improved the introductory remarks for a profile to better describe what a profile is and what it does.
* Fixed a broken constraint that was not targeting the right node.
* started refining descriptions and adding properties to describe identifier attributes.
* Addressed feedback from AJ during 20220718-20220722. (#48)
* Week 30 feedback on SSP model. (#49)
* Proposed metaschema docs updates (#50)
* Addressed feedback based on usnistgov#1392
* Adjustments based on model review feedback on 8/12.
* Removed outdated merge phase remarks. Created issue #53 to address this.
* Addressed A.J. Stein's Week 32 Feedback for Model Review (#52)
* Addressed AJ Stein's week 32 feedback for usnistgov#1331.
* Addressed DRAFT: Update catalog & profile metaschema documentation (#51)
* Update catalog & profile metaschema documentation
* Add props to control identifier
* Fixed broken syntax and addressed consistency in wording within the Profile 'merge' construct.
* Adjustments to alter, moving to to an inline definition
* cleaned up empty remark.
* Removed redundant constraints
* removed some redundant constraints
* Preliminary work on URI documentation to address usnistgov#1249.
* More work on document URI use in OSCAL
* Updating data types related to usnistgov/metaschema#224.
* Improved consistency of how URI concepts are discussed.
* Added note about party locations
* Updated Metaschema instances of `uri` and `uri-reference` data types to indicate their URI semantics. Resolves usnistgov#1249.
* Added identifier props to control layer metaschemas (#55)
* Responding to usnistgov#1066: metaschema edits; CSS enhancement (#56)
* Whitespace cleanup in metadata metaschema
* Apply suggestions from code review

Co-authored-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@nist.gov>
Co-authored-by: Wendell Piez <wapiez@wendellpiez.com>
Co-authored-by: Rene Tshiteya <rene-claude.tshiteya@gsa.gov>
david-waltermire pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 28, 2022
…1263)

* completed partial update of the Metadata object documentation.
* adjustments to roles
* adjusted the cardinality of location/address to make address optional.
* Improved documentation and constraints related to location and parties
* addressed the remainder of metadata and control feedback from @Rene2mt.
* Improved the introductory remarks for a profile to better describe what a profile is and what it does.
* Fixed a broken constraint that was not targeting the right node.
* started refining descriptions and adding properties to describe identifier attributes.
* Addressed feedback from AJ during 20220718-20220722. (#48)
* Week 30 feedback on SSP model. (#49)
* Proposed metaschema docs updates (#50)
* Addressed feedback based on usnistgov#1392
* Adjustments based on model review feedback on 8/12.
* Removed outdated merge phase remarks. Created issue #53 to address this.
* Addressed A.J. Stein's Week 32 Feedback for Model Review (#52)
* Addressed AJ Stein's week 32 feedback for usnistgov#1331.
* Addressed DRAFT: Update catalog & profile metaschema documentation (#51)
* Update catalog & profile metaschema documentation
* Add props to control identifier
* Fixed broken syntax and addressed consistency in wording within the Profile 'merge' construct.
* Adjustments to alter, moving to to an inline definition
* cleaned up empty remark.
* Removed redundant constraints
* removed some redundant constraints
* Preliminary work on URI documentation to address usnistgov#1249.
* More work on document URI use in OSCAL
* Updating data types related to usnistgov/metaschema#224.
* Improved consistency of how URI concepts are discussed.
* Added note about party locations
* Updated Metaschema instances of `uri` and `uri-reference` data types to indicate their URI semantics. Resolves usnistgov#1249.
* Added identifier props to control layer metaschemas (#55)
* Responding to usnistgov#1066: metaschema edits; CSS enhancement (#56)
* Whitespace cleanup in metadata metaschema
* Apply suggestions from code review

Co-authored-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@nist.gov>
Co-authored-by: Wendell Piez <wapiez@wendellpiez.com>
Co-authored-by: Rene Tshiteya <rene-claude.tshiteya@gsa.gov>
david-waltermire pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 31, 2022
…1263)

* completed partial update of the Metadata object documentation.
* adjustments to roles
* adjusted the cardinality of location/address to make address optional.
* Improved documentation and constraints related to location and parties
* addressed the remainder of metadata and control feedback from @Rene2mt.
* Improved the introductory remarks for a profile to better describe what a profile is and what it does.
* Fixed a broken constraint that was not targeting the right node.
* started refining descriptions and adding properties to describe identifier attributes.
* Addressed feedback from AJ during 20220718-20220722. (#48)
* Week 30 feedback on SSP model. (#49)
* Proposed metaschema docs updates (#50)
* Addressed feedback based on usnistgov#1392
* Adjustments based on model review feedback on 8/12.
* Removed outdated merge phase remarks. Created issue #53 to address this.
* Addressed A.J. Stein's Week 32 Feedback for Model Review (#52)
* Addressed AJ Stein's week 32 feedback for usnistgov#1331.
* Addressed DRAFT: Update catalog & profile metaschema documentation (#51)
* Update catalog & profile metaschema documentation
* Add props to control identifier
* Fixed broken syntax and addressed consistency in wording within the Profile 'merge' construct.
* Adjustments to alter, moving to to an inline definition
* cleaned up empty remark.
* Removed redundant constraints
* removed some redundant constraints
* Preliminary work on URI documentation to address usnistgov#1249.
* More work on document URI use in OSCAL
* Updating data types related to usnistgov/metaschema#224.
* Improved consistency of how URI concepts are discussed.
* Added note about party locations
* Updated Metaschema instances of `uri` and `uri-reference` data types to indicate their URI semantics. Resolves usnistgov#1249.
* Added identifier props to control layer metaschemas (#55)
* Responding to usnistgov#1066: metaschema edits; CSS enhancement (#56)
* Whitespace cleanup in metadata metaschema
* Apply suggestions from code review

Co-authored-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@nist.gov>
Co-authored-by: Wendell Piez <wapiez@wendellpiez.com>
Co-authored-by: Rene Tshiteya <rene-claude.tshiteya@gsa.gov>
david-waltermire pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 5, 2023
…1263)

* completed partial update of the Metadata object documentation.
* adjustments to roles
* adjusted the cardinality of location/address to make address optional.
* Improved documentation and constraints related to location and parties
* addressed the remainder of metadata and control feedback from @Rene2mt.
* Improved the introductory remarks for a profile to better describe what a profile is and what it does.
* Fixed a broken constraint that was not targeting the right node.
* started refining descriptions and adding properties to describe identifier attributes.
* Addressed feedback from AJ during 20220718-20220722. (#48)
* Week 30 feedback on SSP model. (#49)
* Proposed metaschema docs updates (#50)
* Addressed feedback based on usnistgov#1392
* Adjustments based on model review feedback on 8/12.
* Removed outdated merge phase remarks. Created issue #53 to address this.
* Addressed A.J. Stein's Week 32 Feedback for Model Review (#52)
* Addressed AJ Stein's week 32 feedback for usnistgov#1331.
* Addressed DRAFT: Update catalog & profile metaschema documentation (#51)
* Update catalog & profile metaschema documentation
* Add props to control identifier
* Fixed broken syntax and addressed consistency in wording within the Profile 'merge' construct.
* Adjustments to alter, moving to to an inline definition
* cleaned up empty remark.
* Removed redundant constraints
* removed some redundant constraints
* Preliminary work on URI documentation to address usnistgov#1249.
* More work on document URI use in OSCAL
* Updating data types related to usnistgov/metaschema#224.
* Improved consistency of how URI concepts are discussed.
* Added note about party locations
* Updated Metaschema instances of `uri` and `uri-reference` data types to indicate their URI semantics. Resolves usnistgov#1249.
* Added identifier props to control layer metaschemas (#55)
* Responding to usnistgov#1066: metaschema edits; CSS enhancement (#56)
* Whitespace cleanup in metadata metaschema
* Apply suggestions from code review

Co-authored-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@nist.gov>
Co-authored-by: Wendell Piez <wapiez@wendellpiez.com>
Co-authored-by: Rene Tshiteya <rene-claude.tshiteya@gsa.gov>
david-waltermire pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 5, 2024
…1263)

* completed partial update of the Metadata object documentation.
* adjustments to roles
* adjusted the cardinality of location/address to make address optional.
* Improved documentation and constraints related to location and parties
* addressed the remainder of metadata and control feedback from @Rene2mt.
* Improved the introductory remarks for a profile to better describe what a profile is and what it does.
* Fixed a broken constraint that was not targeting the right node.
* started refining descriptions and adding properties to describe identifier attributes.
* Addressed feedback from AJ during 20220718-20220722. (#48)
* Week 30 feedback on SSP model. (#49)
* Proposed metaschema docs updates (#50)
* Addressed feedback based on usnistgov#1392
* Adjustments based on model review feedback on 8/12.
* Removed outdated merge phase remarks. Created issue #53 to address this.
* Addressed A.J. Stein's Week 32 Feedback for Model Review (#52)
* Addressed AJ Stein's week 32 feedback for usnistgov#1331.
* Addressed DRAFT: Update catalog & profile metaschema documentation (#51)
* Update catalog & profile metaschema documentation
* Add props to control identifier
* Fixed broken syntax and addressed consistency in wording within the Profile 'merge' construct.
* Adjustments to alter, moving to to an inline definition
* cleaned up empty remark.
* Removed redundant constraints
* removed some redundant constraints
* Preliminary work on URI documentation to address usnistgov#1249.
* More work on document URI use in OSCAL
* Updating data types related to usnistgov/metaschema#224.
* Improved consistency of how URI concepts are discussed.
* Added note about party locations
* Updated Metaschema instances of `uri` and `uri-reference` data types to indicate their URI semantics. Resolves usnistgov#1249.
* Added identifier props to control layer metaschemas (#55)
* Responding to usnistgov#1066: metaschema edits; CSS enhancement (#56)
* Whitespace cleanup in metadata metaschema
* Apply suggestions from code review

Co-authored-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@nist.gov>
Co-authored-by: Wendell Piez <wapiez@wendellpiez.com>
Co-authored-by: Rene Tshiteya <rene-claude.tshiteya@gsa.gov>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants