Skip to content

Conversation

@UdjinM6
Copy link

@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 commented Jul 10, 2020

Fixes #3599 (replaces #3598)

Example build: https://gitlab.com/UdjinM6/dash/-/jobs/632010860#L1235 (some other tests still fail when using shared runners but these failures are unrelated imo)

laanwj added 2 commits July 9, 2020 21:24
e87fefc test: Add rpc_bind test to default-run tests (Wladimir J. van der Laan)

Pull request description:

  Skip the parts that cannot be run on the host due to lack of IPv6 support or a second interface to bind on, and warn appropriately.

  Without no strong requirements (besides being Linux only, which will skip the test) left, add this test to the default in test_runner.

  ~~(the non-IPv6 parts of the two dual-IPv4/6 tests could also be enabled, but first going to look what Travis does here to see if there wasn't another reason it was disabled)~~ done, it only makes sense for the first

Tree-SHA512: 724259b14f59dccc7e61ef071359336adb0f76a63db392b6ce6940e21c8ee0470c35374e82970681261685ef299cd70b0c1372598cea85d341f64c2c40ea28ee
… behaviour.

f3cf95f tests: Modify rpc_bind to conform to bitcoin#14532 behaviour. (Carl Dong)

Pull request description:

  Fixes: bitcoin#14792

Tree-SHA512: 5ee63a06c92dae5406515e9e483188309b82e07b760f363d8c8ec46a42fe5f75f88724759b0ac8ef596ee28a135626e0582f575855c5dfec2fbfff2249a109f7
@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 added this to the 17 milestone Jul 10, 2020
@xdustinface
Copy link

Nice thats way better for sure 🙂

ACK, also works on my VPS now where it failed the same before.

Copy link
Member

@PastaPastaPasta PastaPastaPasta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK, commits match upstream, tests pass on ci

@PastaPastaPasta
Copy link
Member

I'm getting test failures locally on ubuntu 20.04 when running python3 test/functional/test_runner.py in all three of the rpc_bind tests, however when ran individually they pass

@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 deleted the fix_rpcbind branch November 26, 2020 13:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants