journal_head::b_transaction and journal_head::b_next_transaction could
be accessed concurrently as noticed by KCSAN,

 LTP: starting fsync04
 /dev/zero: Can't open blockdev
 EXT4-fs (loop0): mounting ext3 file system using the ext4 subsystem
 EXT4-fs (loop0): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: (null)
 ==================================================================
 BUG: KCSAN: data-race in __jbd2_journal_refile_buffer [jbd2] / jbd2_write_access_granted [jbd2]

 write to 0xffff99f9b1bd0e30 of 8 bytes by task 25721 on cpu 70:
  __jbd2_journal_refile_buffer+0xdd/0x210 [jbd2]
  __jbd2_journal_refile_buffer at fs/jbd2/transaction.c:2569
  jbd2_journal_commit_transaction+0x2d15/0x3f20 [jbd2]
  (inlined by) jbd2_journal_commit_transaction at fs/jbd2/commit.c:1034
  kjournald2+0x13b/0x450 [jbd2]
  kthread+0x1cd/0x1f0
  ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50

 read to 0xffff99f9b1bd0e30 of 8 bytes by task 25724 on cpu 68:
  jbd2_write_access_granted+0x1b2/0x250 [jbd2]
  jbd2_write_access_granted at fs/jbd2/transaction.c:1155
  jbd2_journal_get_write_access+0x2c/0x60 [jbd2]
  __ext4_journal_get_write_access+0x50/0x90 [ext4]
  ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used+0x158/0x620 [ext4]
  ext4_mb_new_blocks+0x54f/0xca0 [ext4]
  ext4_ind_map_blocks+0xc79/0x1b40 [ext4]
  ext4_map_blocks+0x3b4/0x950 [ext4]
  _ext4_get_block+0xfc/0x270 [ext4]
  ext4_get_block+0x3b/0x50 [ext4]
  __block_write_begin_int+0x22e/0xae0
  __block_write_begin+0x39/0x50
  ext4_write_begin+0x388/0xb50 [ext4]
  generic_perform_write+0x15d/0x290
  ext4_buffered_write_iter+0x11f/0x210 [ext4]
  ext4_file_write_iter+0xce/0x9e0 [ext4]
  new_sync_write+0x29c/0x3b0
  __vfs_write+0x92/0xa0
  vfs_write+0x103/0x260
  ksys_write+0x9d/0x130
  __x64_sys_write+0x4c/0x60
  do_syscall_64+0x91/0xb05
  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe

 5 locks held by fsync04/25724:
  #0: ffff99f9911093f8 (sb_writers#13){.+.+}, at: vfs_write+0x21c/0x260
  #1: ffff99f9db4c0348 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15){+.+.}, at: ext4_buffered_write_iter+0x65/0x210 [ext4]
  #2: ffff99f5e7dfcf58 (jbd2_handle){++++}, at: start_this_handle+0x1c1/0x9d0 [jbd2]
  #3: ffff99f9db4c0168 (&ei->i_data_sem){++++}, at: ext4_map_blocks+0x176/0x950 [ext4]
  thesofproject#4: ffffffff99086b40 (rcu_read_lock){....}, at: jbd2_write_access_granted+0x4e/0x250 [jbd2]
 irq event stamp: 1407125
 hardirqs last  enabled at (1407125): [<ffffffff980da9b7>] __find_get_block+0x107/0x790
 hardirqs last disabled at (1407124): [<ffffffff980da8f9>] __find_get_block+0x49/0x790
 softirqs last  enabled at (1405528): [<ffffffff98a0034c>] __do_softirq+0x34c/0x57c
 softirqs last disabled at (1405521): [<ffffffff97cc67a2>] irq_exit+0xa2/0xc0

 Reported by Kernel Concurrency Sanitizer on:
 CPU: 68 PID: 25724 Comm: fsync04 Tainted: G L 5.6.0-rc2-next-20200221+ thesofproject#7
 Hardware name: HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen10/ProLiant DL385 Gen10, BIOS A40 07/10/2019

The plain reads are outside of jh->b_state_lock critical section which result
in data races. Fix them by adding pairs of READ|WRITE_ONCE().

Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200222043111.2227-1-cai@lca.pw
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

Fix NULL pointer dereference in the error flow of ib_create_qp_user
when accessing to uninitialized list pointers - rdma_mrs and sig_mrs.
The following crash from syzkaller revealed it.

  kasan: GPF could be caused by NULL-ptr deref or user memory access
  general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI
  CPU: 1 PID: 23167 Comm: syz-executor.1 Not tainted 5.5.0-rc5 #2
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS
  rel-1.12.1-0-ga5cab58e9a3f-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
  RIP: 0010:ib_mr_pool_destroy+0x81/0x1f0
  Code: 00 00 fc ff df 49 c1 ec 03 4d 01 fc e8 a8 ea 72 fe 41 80 3c 24 00
  0f 85 62 01 00 00 48 8b 13 48 89 d6 4c 8d 6a c8 48 c1 ee 03 <42> 80 3c
  3e 00 0f 85 34 01 00 00 48 8d 7a 08 4c 8b 02 48 89 fe 48
  RSP: 0018:ffffc9000951f8b0 EFLAGS: 00010046
  RAX: 0000000000040000 RBX: ffff88810f268038 RCX: ffffffff82c41628
  RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffffc9000951f850
  RBP: ffff88810f268020 R08: 0000000000000004 R09: fffff520012a3f0a
  R10: 0000000000000001 R11: fffff520012a3f0a R12: ffffed1021e4d007
  R13: ffffffffffffffc8 R14: 0000000000000246 R15: dffffc0000000000
  FS:  00007f54bc788700(0000) GS:ffff88811b100000(0000)
  knlGS:0000000000000000
  CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
  CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 0000000116920002 CR4: 0000000000360ee0
  DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
  DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
  Call Trace:
   rdma_rw_cleanup_mrs+0x15/0x30
   ib_destroy_qp_user+0x674/0x7d0
   ib_create_qp_user+0xb01/0x11c0
   create_qp+0x1517/0x2130
   ib_uverbs_create_qp+0x13e/0x190
   ib_uverbs_write+0xaa5/0xdf0
   __vfs_write+0x7c/0x100
   vfs_write+0x168/0x4a0
   ksys_write+0xc8/0x200
   do_syscall_64+0x9c/0x390
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
  RIP: 0033:0x465b49
  Code: f7 d8 64 89 02 b8 ff ff ff ff c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 89 f8 48 89
  f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01
  f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 bc ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
  RSP: 002b:00007f54bc787c58 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001
  RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000073bf00 RCX: 0000000000465b49
  RDX: 0000000000000040 RSI: 0000000020000540 RDI: 0000000000000003
  RBP: 00007f54bc787c70 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
  R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f54bc7886bc
  R13: 00000000004ca2ec R14: 000000000070ded0 R15: 0000000000000005

Fixes: a060b56 ("IB/core: generic RDMA READ/WRITE API")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200227112708.93023-1-leon@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Maor Gottlieb <maorg@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>

…init sequences

The Slave device initialization can be split in 4 different cases:

1. Master-initiated hardware reset, system suspend-resume and
pm_runtime based on clock-stop mode1. To avoid timeouts and a bad
audio experience, the Slave device resume operations need to wait for
the Slave device to be re-enumerated and its settings restored.

2. Exit from clock-stop mode0. In this case, the Slave device is
required to remain enumerated and its context preserved while the
clock is stopped, so no re-initialization or wait_for_completion() is
necessary.

3. Slave-initiated pm_runtime D3 transition. With the parent child
relationship, it is possible that a Slave device becomes 'suspended'
while its parent is still 'active' with the bus clock still
toggling. In this case, during the pm_runtime resume operation, there
is no need to wait for any settings to be restored.

4. Slave reset (sync loss or implementation-defined). In that case the
bus remains operational and the Slave device will be re-initialized
when it becomes ATTACHED again.

In previous patches, we suggested the use of wait_for_completion() to
deal with the case #1, but case #2 and #3 do not need any wait.

To account for those differences, this patch adds an unattach_request
field. The field is explicitly set by the Master for the case #1, and
if non-zero the Slave device shall wait on resume. In all other cases,
the Slave resume operations can proceed without wait.

The only request tracked so far is Master HardReset, but the request
is declared as a bit mask for future extensions (if needed). The
definition for this value is added in bus.h and does not need to be
exposed in sdw.h

Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191212014507.28050-5-pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
(cherry picked from commit b2bd75f)
Signed-off-by: Chintan Patel <chintan.m.patel@intel.com>

BUG=b:153422295
TEST=No audio regression on TGL/JSL devices

Change-Id: I50ef8dca95e10994fa9b3ad024745f776fca6cc1

…init sequences

The Slave device initialization can be split in 4 different cases:

1. Master-initiated hardware reset, system suspend-resume and
pm_runtime based on clock-stop mode1. To avoid timeouts and a bad
audio experience, the Slave device resume operations need to wait for
the Slave device to be re-enumerated and its settings restored.

2. Exit from clock-stop mode0. In this case, the Slave device is
required to remain enumerated and its context preserved while the
clock is stopped, so no re-initialization or wait_for_completion() is
necessary.

3. Slave-initiated pm_runtime D3 transition. With the parent child
relationship, it is possible that a Slave device becomes 'suspended'
while its parent is still 'active' with the bus clock still
toggling. In this case, during the pm_runtime resume operation, there
is no need to wait for any settings to be restored.

4. Slave reset (sync loss or implementation-defined). In that case the
bus remains operational and the Slave device will be re-initialized
when it becomes ATTACHED again.

In previous patches, we suggested the use of wait_for_completion() to
deal with the case #1, but case #2 and #3 do not need any wait.

To account for those differences, this patch adds an unattach_request
field. The field is explicitly set by the Master for the case #1, and
if non-zero the Slave device shall wait on resume. In all other cases,
the Slave resume operations can proceed without wait.

The only request tracked so far is Master HardReset, but the request
is declared as a bit mask for future extensions (if needed). The
definition for this value is added in bus.h and does not need to be
exposed in sdw.h

Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191212014507.28050-5-pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
(cherry picked from commit b2bd75f)
Signed-off-by: Chintan Patel <chintan.m.patel@intel.com>

BUG=b:153422295
TEST=No audio regression on TGL/JSL devices

Change-Id: I50ef8dca95e10994fa9b3ad024745f776fca6cc1
Signed-off-by: Curtis Malainey <cujomalainey@chromium.org>

…init sequences

The Slave device initialization can be split in 4 different cases:

1. Master-initiated hardware reset, system suspend-resume and
pm_runtime based on clock-stop mode1. To avoid timeouts and a bad
audio experience, the Slave device resume operations need to wait for
the Slave device to be re-enumerated and its settings restored.

2. Exit from clock-stop mode0. In this case, the Slave device is
required to remain enumerated and its context preserved while the
clock is stopped, so no re-initialization or wait_for_completion() is
necessary.

3. Slave-initiated pm_runtime D3 transition. With the parent child
relationship, it is possible that a Slave device becomes 'suspended'
while its parent is still 'active' with the bus clock still
toggling. In this case, during the pm_runtime resume operation, there
is no need to wait for any settings to be restored.

4. Slave reset (sync loss or implementation-defined). In that case the
bus remains operational and the Slave device will be re-initialized
when it becomes ATTACHED again.

In previous patches, we suggested the use of wait_for_completion() to
deal with the case #1, but case #2 and #3 do not need any wait.

To account for those differences, this patch adds an unattach_request
field. The field is explicitly set by the Master for the case #1, and
if non-zero the Slave device shall wait on resume. In all other cases,
the Slave resume operations can proceed without wait.

The only request tracked so far is Master HardReset, but the request
is declared as a bit mask for future extensions (if needed). The
definition for this value is added in bus.h and does not need to be
exposed in sdw.h

Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191212014507.28050-5-pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
(cherry picked from commit b2bd75f)
Signed-off-by: Chintan Patel <chintan.m.patel@intel.com>

BUG=b:153422295
TEST=No audio regression on TGL/JSL devices

Change-Id: I50ef8dca95e10994fa9b3ad024745f776fca6cc1
Signed-off-by: Curtis Malainey <cujomalainey@chromium.org>

…dency

[ Upstream commit 7809f70 ]

On a very heavily loaded D05 with GICv4, I managed to trigger the
following lockdep splat:

[ 6022.598864] ======================================================
[ 6022.605031] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[ 6022.611200] 5.6.0-rc4-00026-geee7c7b0f498 thesofproject#680 Tainted: G            E
[ 6022.618061] ------------------------------------------------------
[ 6022.624227] qemu-system-aar/7569 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 6022.629789] ffff042f97606808 (&p->pi_lock){-.-.}, at: try_to_wake_up+0x54/0x7a0
[ 6022.637102]
[ 6022.637102] but task is already holding lock:
[ 6022.642921] ffff002fae424cf0 (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}, at: __irq_get_desc_lock+0x5c/0x98
[ 6022.651350]
[ 6022.651350] which lock already depends on the new lock.
[ 6022.651350]
[ 6022.659512]
[ 6022.659512] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[ 6022.666980]
[ 6022.666980] -> #2 (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}:
[ 6022.672983]        _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x50/0x78
[ 6022.677848]        __irq_get_desc_lock+0x5c/0x98
[ 6022.682453]        irq_set_vcpu_affinity+0x40/0xc0
[ 6022.687236]        its_make_vpe_non_resident+0x6c/0xb8
[ 6022.692364]        vgic_v4_put+0x54/0x70
[ 6022.696273]        vgic_v3_put+0x20/0xd8
[ 6022.700183]        kvm_vgic_put+0x30/0x48
[ 6022.704182]        kvm_arch_vcpu_put+0x34/0x50
[ 6022.708614]        kvm_sched_out+0x34/0x50
[ 6022.712700]        __schedule+0x4bc/0x7f8
[ 6022.716697]        schedule+0x50/0xd8
[ 6022.720347]        kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x5f0/0x978
[ 6022.725473]        kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x3d4/0x8f8
[ 6022.729820]        ksys_ioctl+0x90/0xd0
[ 6022.733642]        __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x24/0x30
[ 6022.738074]        el0_svc_common.constprop.3+0xa8/0x1e8
[ 6022.743373]        do_el0_svc+0x28/0x88
[ 6022.747198]        el0_svc+0x14/0x40
[ 6022.750761]        el0_sync_handler+0x124/0x2b8
[ 6022.755278]        el0_sync+0x140/0x180
[ 6022.759100]
[ 6022.759100] -> #1 (&rq->lock){-.-.}:
[ 6022.764143]        _raw_spin_lock+0x38/0x50
[ 6022.768314]        task_fork_fair+0x40/0x128
[ 6022.772572]        sched_fork+0xe0/0x210
[ 6022.776484]        copy_process+0x8c4/0x18d8
[ 6022.780742]        _do_fork+0x88/0x6d8
[ 6022.784478]        kernel_thread+0x64/0x88
[ 6022.788563]        rest_init+0x30/0x270
[ 6022.792390]        arch_call_rest_init+0x14/0x1c
[ 6022.796995]        start_kernel+0x498/0x4c4
[ 6022.801164]
[ 6022.801164] -> #0 (&p->pi_lock){-.-.}:
[ 6022.806382]        __lock_acquire+0xdd8/0x15c8
[ 6022.810813]        lock_acquire+0xd0/0x218
[ 6022.814896]        _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x50/0x78
[ 6022.819761]        try_to_wake_up+0x54/0x7a0
[ 6022.824018]        wake_up_process+0x1c/0x28
[ 6022.828276]        wakeup_softirqd+0x38/0x40
[ 6022.832533]        __tasklet_schedule_common+0xc4/0xf0
[ 6022.837658]        __tasklet_schedule+0x24/0x30
[ 6022.842176]        check_irq_resend+0xc8/0x158
[ 6022.846609]        irq_startup+0x74/0x128
[ 6022.850606]        __enable_irq+0x6c/0x78
[ 6022.854602]        enable_irq+0x54/0xa0
[ 6022.858431]        its_make_vpe_non_resident+0xa4/0xb8
[ 6022.863557]        vgic_v4_put+0x54/0x70
[ 6022.867469]        kvm_arch_vcpu_blocking+0x28/0x38
[ 6022.872336]        kvm_vcpu_block+0x48/0x490
[ 6022.876594]        kvm_handle_wfx+0x18c/0x310
[ 6022.880938]        handle_exit+0x138/0x198
[ 6022.885022]        kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x4d4/0x978
[ 6022.890148]        kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x3d4/0x8f8
[ 6022.894494]        ksys_ioctl+0x90/0xd0
[ 6022.898317]        __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x24/0x30
[ 6022.902748]        el0_svc_common.constprop.3+0xa8/0x1e8
[ 6022.908046]        do_el0_svc+0x28/0x88
[ 6022.911871]        el0_svc+0x14/0x40
[ 6022.915434]        el0_sync_handler+0x124/0x2b8
[ 6022.919951]        el0_sync+0x140/0x180
[ 6022.923773]
[ 6022.923773] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 6022.923773]
[ 6022.931762] Chain exists of:
[ 6022.931762]   &p->pi_lock --> &rq->lock --> &irq_desc_lock_class
[ 6022.931762]
[ 6022.942101]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 6022.942101]
[ 6022.948007]        CPU0                    CPU1
[ 6022.952523]        ----                    ----
[ 6022.957039]   lock(&irq_desc_lock_class);
[ 6022.961036]                                lock(&rq->lock);
[ 6022.966595]                                lock(&irq_desc_lock_class);
[ 6022.973109]   lock(&p->pi_lock);
[ 6022.976324]
[ 6022.976324]  *** DEADLOCK ***

This is happening because we have a pending doorbell that requires
retrigger. As SW retriggering is done in a tasklet, we trigger the
circular dependency above.

The easy cop-out is to provide a retrigger callback that doesn't
require acquiring any extra lock.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200310184921.23552-5-maz@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

commit f0cc2cd upstream.

During unmount we can have a job from the delayed inode items work queue
still running, that can lead to at least two bad things:

1) A crash, because the worker can try to create a transaction just
   after the fs roots were freed;

2) A transaction leak, because the worker can create a transaction
   before the fs roots are freed and just after we committed the last
   transaction and after we stopped the transaction kthread.

A stack trace example of the crash:

 [79011.691214] kernel BUG at lib/radix-tree.c:982!
 [79011.692056] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC PTI
 [79011.693180] CPU: 3 PID: 1394 Comm: kworker/u8:2 Tainted: G        W         5.6.0-rc2-btrfs-next-54 #2
 (...)
 [79011.696789] Workqueue: btrfs-delayed-meta btrfs_work_helper [btrfs]
 [79011.697904] RIP: 0010:radix_tree_tag_set+0xe7/0x170
 (...)
 [79011.702014] RSP: 0018:ffffb3c84a317ca0 EFLAGS: 00010293
 [79011.702949] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000
 [79011.704202] RDX: ffffb3c84a317cb0 RSI: ffffb3c84a317ca8 RDI: ffff8db3931340a0
 [79011.705463] RBP: 0000000000000005 R08: 0000000000000005 R09: ffffffff974629d0
 [79011.706756] R10: ffffb3c84a317bc0 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff8db393134000
 [79011.708010] R13: ffff8db3931340a0 R14: ffff8db393134068 R15: 0000000000000001
 [79011.709270] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8db3b6a00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
 [79011.710699] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
 [79011.711710] CR2: 00007f22c2a0a000 CR3: 0000000232ad4005 CR4: 00000000003606e0
 [79011.712958] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
 [79011.714205] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
 [79011.715448] Call Trace:
 [79011.715925]  record_root_in_trans+0x72/0xf0 [btrfs]
 [79011.716819]  btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x4b/0x70 [btrfs]
 [79011.717925]  start_transaction+0xdd/0x5c0 [btrfs]
 [79011.718829]  btrfs_async_run_delayed_root+0x17e/0x2b0 [btrfs]
 [79011.719915]  btrfs_work_helper+0xaa/0x720 [btrfs]
 [79011.720773]  process_one_work+0x26d/0x6a0
 [79011.721497]  worker_thread+0x4f/0x3e0
 [79011.722153]  ? process_one_work+0x6a0/0x6a0
 [79011.722901]  kthread+0x103/0x140
 [79011.723481]  ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x70/0x70
 [79011.724379]  ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50
 (...)

The following diagram shows a sequence of steps that lead to the crash
during ummount of the filesystem:

        CPU 1                                             CPU 2                                CPU 3

 btrfs_punch_hole()
   btrfs_btree_balance_dirty()
     btrfs_balance_delayed_items()
       --> sees
           fs_info->delayed_root->items
           with value 200, which is greater
           than
           BTRFS_DELAYED_BACKGROUND (128)
           and smaller than
           BTRFS_DELAYED_WRITEBACK (512)
       btrfs_wq_run_delayed_node()
         --> queues a job for
             fs_info->delayed_workers to run
             btrfs_async_run_delayed_root()

                                                                                            btrfs_async_run_delayed_root()
                                                                                              --> job queued by CPU 1

                                                                                              --> starts picking and running
                                                                                                  delayed nodes from the
                                                                                                  prepare_list list

                                                 close_ctree()

                                                   btrfs_delete_unused_bgs()

                                                   btrfs_commit_super()

                                                     btrfs_join_transaction()
                                                       --> gets transaction N

                                                     btrfs_commit_transaction(N)
                                                       --> set transaction state
                                                        to TRANTS_STATE_COMMIT_START

                                                                                             btrfs_first_prepared_delayed_node()
                                                                                               --> picks delayed node X through
                                                                                                   the prepared_list list

                                                       btrfs_run_delayed_items()

                                                         btrfs_first_delayed_node()
                                                           --> also picks delayed node X
                                                               but through the node_list
                                                               list

                                                         __btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_items()
                                                            --> runs all delayed items from
                                                                this node and drops the
                                                                node's item count to 0
                                                                through call to
                                                                btrfs_release_delayed_inode()

                                                         --> finishes running any remaining
                                                             delayed nodes

                                                       --> finishes transaction commit

                                                   --> stops cleaner and transaction threads

                                                   btrfs_free_fs_roots()
                                                     --> frees all roots and removes them
                                                         from the radix tree
                                                         fs_info->fs_roots_radix

                                                                                             btrfs_join_transaction()
                                                                                               start_transaction()
                                                                                                 btrfs_record_root_in_trans()
                                                                                                   record_root_in_trans()
                                                                                                     radix_tree_tag_set()
                                                                                                       --> crashes because
                                                                                                           the root is not in
                                                                                                           the radix tree
                                                                                                           anymore

If the worker is able to call btrfs_join_transaction() before the unmount
task frees the fs roots, we end up leaking a transaction and all its
resources, since after the call to btrfs_commit_super() and stopping the
transaction kthread, we don't expect to have any transaction open anymore.

When this situation happens the worker has a delayed node that has no
more items to run, since the task calling btrfs_run_delayed_items(),
which is doing a transaction commit, picks the same node and runs all
its items first.

We can not wait for the worker to complete when running delayed items
through btrfs_run_delayed_items(), because we call that function in
several phases of a transaction commit, and that could cause a deadlock
because the worker calls btrfs_join_transaction() and the task doing the
transaction commit may have already set the transaction state to
TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_DOING.

Also it's not possible to get into a situation where only some of the
items of a delayed node are added to the fs/subvolume tree in the current
transaction and the remaining ones in the next transaction, because when
running the items of a delayed inode we lock its mutex, effectively
waiting for the worker if the worker is running the items of the delayed
node already.

Since this can only cause issues when unmounting a filesystem, fix it in
a simple way by waiting for any jobs on the delayed workers queue before
calling btrfs_commit_supper() at close_ctree(). This works because at this
point no one can call btrfs_btree_balance_dirty() or
btrfs_balance_delayed_items(), and if we end up waiting for any worker to
complete, btrfs_commit_super() will commit the transaction created by the
worker.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

commit 351cbf6 upstream.

Zygo reported the following lockdep splat while testing the balance
patches

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.6.0-c6f0579d496a+ thesofproject#53 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
kswapd0/1133 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff888092f622c0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}, at: __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x7c/0x5b0

but task is already holding lock:
ffffffff8fc5f860 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30

which lock already depends on the new lock.

the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #1 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}:
       fs_reclaim_acquire.part.91+0x29/0x30
       fs_reclaim_acquire+0x19/0x20
       kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x32/0x740
       add_block_entry+0x45/0x260
       btrfs_ref_tree_mod+0x6e2/0x8b0
       btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x789/0x880
       alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0xc6/0xf0
       __btrfs_cow_block+0x270/0x940
       btrfs_cow_block+0x1ba/0x3a0
       btrfs_search_slot+0x999/0x1030
       btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x81/0xe0
       btrfs_insert_delayed_items+0x128/0x7d0
       __btrfs_run_delayed_items+0xf4/0x2a0
       btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x13/0x20
       btrfs_commit_transaction+0x5cc/0x1390
       insert_balance_item.isra.39+0x6b2/0x6e0
       btrfs_balance+0x72d/0x18d0
       btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x3de/0x4c0
       btrfs_ioctl+0x30ab/0x44a0
       ksys_ioctl+0xa1/0xe0
       __x64_sys_ioctl+0x43/0x50
       do_syscall_64+0x77/0x2c0
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe

-> #0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}:
       __lock_acquire+0x197e/0x2550
       lock_acquire+0x103/0x220
       __mutex_lock+0x13d/0xce0
       mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20
       __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x7c/0x5b0
       btrfs_remove_delayed_node+0x49/0x50
       btrfs_evict_inode+0x6fc/0x900
       evict+0x19a/0x2c0
       dispose_list+0xa0/0xe0
       prune_icache_sb+0xbd/0xf0
       super_cache_scan+0x1b5/0x250
       do_shrink_slab+0x1f6/0x530
       shrink_slab+0x32e/0x410
       shrink_node+0x2a5/0xba0
       balance_pgdat+0x4bd/0x8a0
       kswapd+0x35a/0x800
       kthread+0x1e9/0x210
       ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50

other info that might help us debug this:

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(fs_reclaim);
                               lock(&delayed_node->mutex);
                               lock(fs_reclaim);
  lock(&delayed_node->mutex);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

3 locks held by kswapd0/1133:
 #0: ffffffff8fc5f860 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30
 #1: ffffffff8fc380d8 (shrinker_rwsem){++++}, at: shrink_slab+0x1e8/0x410
 #2: ffff8881e0e6c0e8 (&type->s_umount_key#42){++++}, at: trylock_super+0x1b/0x70

stack backtrace:
CPU: 2 PID: 1133 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 5.6.0-c6f0579d496a+ thesofproject#53
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.12.0-1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
 dump_stack+0xc1/0x11a
 print_circular_bug.isra.38.cold.57+0x145/0x14a
 check_noncircular+0x2a9/0x2f0
 ? print_circular_bug.isra.38+0x130/0x130
 ? stack_trace_consume_entry+0x90/0x90
 ? save_trace+0x3cc/0x420
 __lock_acquire+0x197e/0x2550
 ? btrfs_inode_clear_file_extent_range+0x9b/0xb0
 ? register_lock_class+0x960/0x960
 lock_acquire+0x103/0x220
 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x7c/0x5b0
 __mutex_lock+0x13d/0xce0
 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x7c/0x5b0
 ? __asan_loadN+0xf/0x20
 ? pvclock_clocksource_read+0xeb/0x190
 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x7c/0x5b0
 ? mutex_lock_io_nested+0xc20/0xc20
 ? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20
 ? check_chain_key+0x1e6/0x2e0
 mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20
 ? mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20
 __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x7c/0x5b0
 btrfs_remove_delayed_node+0x49/0x50
 btrfs_evict_inode+0x6fc/0x900
 ? btrfs_setattr+0x840/0x840
 ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0xa8/0x140
 evict+0x19a/0x2c0
 dispose_list+0xa0/0xe0
 prune_icache_sb+0xbd/0xf0
 ? invalidate_inodes+0x310/0x310
 super_cache_scan+0x1b5/0x250
 do_shrink_slab+0x1f6/0x530
 shrink_slab+0x32e/0x410
 ? do_shrink_slab+0x530/0x530
 ? do_shrink_slab+0x530/0x530
 ? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20
 ? mem_cgroup_protected+0x13d/0x260
 shrink_node+0x2a5/0xba0
 balance_pgdat+0x4bd/0x8a0
 ? mem_cgroup_shrink_node+0x490/0x490
 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x27/0x40
 ? finish_task_switch+0xce/0x390
 ? rcu_read_lock_bh_held+0xb0/0xb0
 kswapd+0x35a/0x800
 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x4c/0x60
 ? balance_pgdat+0x8a0/0x8a0
 ? finish_wait+0x110/0x110
 ? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20
 ? __kthread_parkme+0xc6/0xe0
 ? balance_pgdat+0x8a0/0x8a0
 kthread+0x1e9/0x210
 ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0xc0/0xc0
 ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50

This is because we hold that delayed node's mutex while doing tree
operations.  Fix this by just wrapping the searches in nofs.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

commit 28936b6 upstream.

inode->i_blocks could be accessed concurrently as noticed by KCSAN,

 BUG: KCSAN: data-race in ext4_do_update_inode [ext4] / inode_add_bytes

 write to 0xffff9a00d4b982d0 of 8 bytes by task 22100 on cpu 118:
  inode_add_bytes+0x65/0xf0
  __inode_add_bytes at fs/stat.c:689
  (inlined by) inode_add_bytes at fs/stat.c:702
  ext4_mb_new_blocks+0x418/0xca0 [ext4]
  ext4_ext_map_blocks+0x1a6b/0x27b0 [ext4]
  ext4_map_blocks+0x1a9/0x950 [ext4]
  _ext4_get_block+0xfc/0x270 [ext4]
  ext4_get_block_unwritten+0x33/0x50 [ext4]
  __block_write_begin_int+0x22e/0xae0
  __block_write_begin+0x39/0x50
  ext4_write_begin+0x388/0xb50 [ext4]
  ext4_da_write_begin+0x35f/0x8f0 [ext4]
  generic_perform_write+0x15d/0x290
  ext4_buffered_write_iter+0x11f/0x210 [ext4]
  ext4_file_write_iter+0xce/0x9e0 [ext4]
  new_sync_write+0x29c/0x3b0
  __vfs_write+0x92/0xa0
  vfs_write+0x103/0x260
  ksys_write+0x9d/0x130
  __x64_sys_write+0x4c/0x60
  do_syscall_64+0x91/0xb05
  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe

 read to 0xffff9a00d4b982d0 of 8 bytes by task 8 on cpu 65:
  ext4_do_update_inode+0x4a0/0xf60 [ext4]
  ext4_inode_blocks_set at fs/ext4/inode.c:4815
  ext4_mark_iloc_dirty+0xaf/0x160 [ext4]
  ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x129/0x3e0 [ext4]
  ext4_convert_unwritten_extents+0x253/0x2d0 [ext4]
  ext4_convert_unwritten_io_end_vec+0xc5/0x150 [ext4]
  ext4_end_io_rsv_work+0x22c/0x350 [ext4]
  process_one_work+0x54f/0xb90
  worker_thread+0x80/0x5f0
  kthread+0x1cd/0x1f0
  ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50

 4 locks held by kworker/u256:0/8:
  #0: ffff9a025abc4328 ((wq_completion)ext4-rsv-conversion){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x443/0xb90
  #1: ffffab5a862dbe20 ((work_completion)(&ei->i_rsv_conversion_work)){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x443/0xb90
  #2: ffff9a025a9d0f58 (jbd2_handle){++++}, at: start_this_handle+0x1c1/0x9d0 [jbd2]
  #3: ffff9a00d4b985d8 (&(&ei->i_raw_lock)->rlock){+.+.}, at: ext4_do_update_inode+0xaa/0xf60 [ext4]
 irq event stamp: 3009267
 hardirqs last  enabled at (3009267): [<ffffffff980da9b7>] __find_get_block+0x107/0x790
 hardirqs last disabled at (3009266): [<ffffffff980da8f9>] __find_get_block+0x49/0x790
 softirqs last  enabled at (3009230): [<ffffffff98a0034c>] __do_softirq+0x34c/0x57c
 softirqs last disabled at (3009223): [<ffffffff97cc67a2>] irq_exit+0xa2/0xc0

 Reported by Kernel Concurrency Sanitizer on:
 CPU: 65 PID: 8 Comm: kworker/u256:0 Tainted: G L 5.6.0-rc2-next-20200221+ thesofproject#7
 Hardware name: HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen10/ProLiant DL385 Gen10, BIOS A40 07/10/2019
 Workqueue: ext4-rsv-conversion ext4_end_io_rsv_work [ext4]

The plain read is outside of inode->i_lock critical section which
results in a data race. Fix it by adding READ_ONCE() there.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200222043258.2279-1-cai@lca.pw
Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

[ Upstream commit a866759 ]

This reverts commit 64e62bd.

This commit ends up causing some lockdep splats due to trying to grab the
payload lock while holding the mgr's lock:

[   54.010099]
[   54.011765] ======================================================
[   54.018670] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[   54.025577] 5.5.0-rc6-02274-g77381c23ee63 thesofproject#47 Not tainted
[   54.031610] ------------------------------------------------------
[   54.038516] kworker/1:6/1040 is trying to acquire lock:
[   54.044354] ffff888272af3228 (&mgr->payload_lock){+.+.}, at:
drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst+0x218/0x2e4
[   54.054957]
[   54.054957] but task is already holding lock:
[   54.061473] ffff888272af3060 (&mgr->lock){+.+.}, at:
drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst+0x3c/0x2e4
[   54.071193]
[   54.071193] which lock already depends on the new lock.
[   54.071193]
[   54.080334]
[   54.080334] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[   54.088697]
[   54.088697] -> #1 (&mgr->lock){+.+.}:
[   54.094440]        __mutex_lock+0xc3/0x498
[   54.099015]        drm_dp_mst_topology_get_port_validated+0x25/0x80
[   54.106018]        drm_dp_update_payload_part1+0xa2/0x2e2
[   54.112051]        intel_mst_pre_enable_dp+0x144/0x18f
[   54.117791]        intel_encoders_pre_enable+0x63/0x70
[   54.123532]        hsw_crtc_enable+0xa1/0x722
[   54.128396]        intel_update_crtc+0x50/0x194
[   54.133455]        skl_commit_modeset_enables+0x40c/0x540
[   54.139485]        intel_atomic_commit_tail+0x5f7/0x130d
[   54.145418]        intel_atomic_commit+0x2c8/0x2d8
[   54.150770]        drm_atomic_helper_set_config+0x5a/0x70
[   54.156801]        drm_mode_setcrtc+0x2ab/0x833
[   54.161862]        drm_ioctl+0x2e5/0x424
[   54.166242]        vfs_ioctl+0x21/0x2f
[   54.170426]        do_vfs_ioctl+0x5fb/0x61e
[   54.175096]        ksys_ioctl+0x55/0x75
[   54.179377]        __x64_sys_ioctl+0x1a/0x1e
[   54.184146]        do_syscall_64+0x5c/0x6d
[   54.188721]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
[   54.194946]
[   54.194946] -> #0 (&mgr->payload_lock){+.+.}:
[   54.201463]
[   54.201463] other info that might help us debug this:
[   54.201463]
[   54.210410]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[   54.210410]
[   54.217025]        CPU0                    CPU1
[   54.222082]        ----                    ----
[   54.227138]   lock(&mgr->lock);
[   54.230643]                                lock(&mgr->payload_lock);
[   54.237742]                                lock(&mgr->lock);
[   54.244062]   lock(&mgr->payload_lock);
[   54.248346]
[   54.248346]  *** DEADLOCK ***
[   54.248346]
[   54.254959] 7 locks held by kworker/1:6/1040:
[   54.259822]  #0: ffff888275c4f528 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.},
at: worker_thread+0x455/0x6e2
[   54.269451]  #1: ffffc9000119beb0
((work_completion)(&(&dev_priv->hotplug.hotplug_work)->work)){+.+.},
at: worker_thread+0x455/0x6e2
[   54.282768]  #2: ffff888272a403f0 (&dev->mode_config.mutex){+.+.},
at: i915_hotplug_work_func+0x4b/0x2be
[   54.293368]  #3: ffffffff824fc6c0 (drm_connector_list_iter){.+.+},
at: i915_hotplug_work_func+0x17e/0x2be
[   54.304061]  thesofproject#4: ffffc9000119bc58 (crtc_ww_class_acquire){+.+.},
at: drm_helper_probe_detect_ctx+0x40/0xfd
[   54.314855]  thesofproject#5: ffff888272a40470 (crtc_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}, at:
drm_modeset_lock+0x74/0xe2
[   54.324385]  thesofproject#6: ffff888272af3060 (&mgr->lock){+.+.}, at:
drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst+0x3c/0x2e4
[   54.334597]
[   54.334597] stack backtrace:
[   54.339464] CPU: 1 PID: 1040 Comm: kworker/1:6 Not tainted
5.5.0-rc6-02274-g77381c23ee63 thesofproject#47
[   54.348893] Hardware name: Google Fizz/Fizz, BIOS
Google_Fizz.10139.39.0 01/04/2018
[   54.357451] Workqueue: events i915_hotplug_work_func
[   54.362995] Call Trace:
[   54.365724]  dump_stack+0x71/0x9c
[   54.369427]  check_noncircular+0x91/0xbc
[   54.373809]  ? __lock_acquire+0xc9e/0xf66
[   54.378286]  ? __lock_acquire+0xc9e/0xf66
[   54.382763]  ? lock_acquire+0x175/0x1ac
[   54.387048]  ? drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst+0x218/0x2e4
[   54.393177]  ? __mutex_lock+0xc3/0x498
[   54.397362]  ? drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst+0x218/0x2e4
[   54.403492]  ? drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst+0x218/0x2e4
[   54.409620]  ? drm_dp_dpcd_access+0xd9/0x101
[   54.414390]  ? drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst+0x218/0x2e4
[   54.420517]  ? drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst+0x218/0x2e4
[   54.426645]  ? intel_digital_port_connected+0x34d/0x35c
[   54.432482]  ? intel_dp_detect+0x227/0x44e
[   54.437056]  ? ww_mutex_lock+0x49/0x9a
[   54.441242]  ? drm_helper_probe_detect_ctx+0x75/0xfd
[   54.446789]  ? intel_encoder_hotplug+0x4b/0x97
[   54.451752]  ? intel_ddi_hotplug+0x61/0x2e0
[   54.456423]  ? mark_held_locks+0x53/0x68
[   54.460803]  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3a/0x51
[   54.466347]  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x187/0x1a4
[   54.471310]  ? drm_connector_list_iter_next+0x89/0x9a
[   54.476953]  ? i915_hotplug_work_func+0x206/0x2be
[   54.482208]  ? worker_thread+0x4d5/0x6e2
[   54.486587]  ? worker_thread+0x455/0x6e2
[   54.490966]  ? queue_work_on+0x64/0x64
[   54.495151]  ? kthread+0x1e9/0x1f1
[   54.498946]  ? queue_work_on+0x64/0x64
[   54.503130]  ? kthread_unpark+0x5e/0x5e
[   54.507413]  ? ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50

The proper fix for this is probably cleanup the VCPI allocations when we're
enabling the topology, or on the first payload allocation. For now though,
let's just revert.

Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Fixes: 64e62bd ("drm/dp_mst: Remove VCPI while disabling topology mgr")
Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Cc: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200117205149.97262-1-lyude@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

Patch series "mm: Fix misuse of parent anon_vma in dup_mmap path".

This patchset fixes the misuse of parenet anon_vma, which mainly caused by
child vma's vm_next and vm_prev are left same as its parent after
duplicate vma.  Finally, code reached parent vma's neighbor by referring
pointer of child vma and executed wrong logic.

The first two patches fix relevant issues, and the third patch sets
vm_next and vm_prev to NULL when duplicate vma to prevent potential misuse
in future.

Effects of the first bug is that causes rmap code to check both parent and
child's page table, although a page couldn't be mapped by both parent and
child, because child vma has WIPEONFORK so all pages mapped by child are
'new' and not relevant to parent.

Effects of the second bug is that the relationship of anon_vma of parent
and child are totallyconvoluted.  It would cause 'son', 'grandson', ...,
etc, to share 'parent' anon_vma, which disobey the design rule of reusing
anon_vma (the rule to be followed is that reusing should among vma of same
process, and vma should not gone through fork).

So, both issues should cause unnecessary rmap walking and have unexpected
complexity.

These two issues would not be directly visible, I used debugging code to
check the anon_vma pointers of parent and child when inspecting the
suspicious implementation of issue #2, then find the problem.

This patch (of 3):

In dup_mmap(), anon_vma_prepare() is called for vma has VM_WIPEONFORK, and
parameter 'tmp' (i.e., the new vma of child) has same ->vm_next and
->vm_prev as its parent vma.  That allows anon_vma used by parent been
mistakenly shared by child (find_mergeable_anon_vma() will do this reuse
work).

Besides this issue, call anon_vma_prepare() should be avoided because we
don't copy page for this vma.  Preparing anon_vma will be handled during
fault.

Fixes: d2cd9ed ("mm,fork: introduce MADV_WIPEONFORK")
Signed-off-by: Li Xinhai <lixinhai.lxh@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1581150928-3214-2-git-send-email-lixinhai.lxh@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

(cherry picked from commit 93949bb)

BUG=chromium:728047
TEST=compilation

Signed-off-by: Linux Patches Robot <linux-patches-robot@chromeos-missing-patches.google.com.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Signed-off-by: Sarthak Kukreti <sarthakkukreti@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I6d7614e4d0c9f5da9a35d7d409c836f09846ae18
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/2154069
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>

It appears that preliminary documentation has a typo in the ID list,
i.e. LPSS UART #2 had been advertised wrongly.

Fix the driver according to the EDS v0.9.

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
(am from https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1223583/)
(also found at https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200414095134.80135-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com)

BUG=b:150154278
TEST=Build chromeos-5.4 kernel and deploy & boot the DUT, then verify the
     PCI value on DUT

Signed-off-by: Mohanram Meenakshisundaram <mohanram.meenakshisundaram@intel.com>
Change-Id: Iab06d760505fd4ad324fa95ea5db19aec5fc0261
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/2148973
Reviewed-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Kirtika Ruchandani <kirtika@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Kirtika Ruchandani <kirtika@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>

…init sequences

The Slave device initialization can be split in 4 different cases:

1. Master-initiated hardware reset, system suspend-resume and
pm_runtime based on clock-stop mode1. To avoid timeouts and a bad
audio experience, the Slave device resume operations need to wait for
the Slave device to be re-enumerated and its settings restored.

2. Exit from clock-stop mode0. In this case, the Slave device is
required to remain enumerated and its context preserved while the
clock is stopped, so no re-initialization or wait_for_completion() is
necessary.

3. Slave-initiated pm_runtime D3 transition. With the parent child
relationship, it is possible that a Slave device becomes 'suspended'
while its parent is still 'active' with the bus clock still
toggling. In this case, during the pm_runtime resume operation, there
is no need to wait for any settings to be restored.

4. Slave reset (sync loss or implementation-defined). In that case the
bus remains operational and the Slave device will be re-initialized
when it becomes ATTACHED again.

In previous patches, we suggested the use of wait_for_completion() to
deal with the case #1, but case #2 and #3 do not need any wait.

To account for those differences, this patch adds an unattach_request
field. The field is explicitly set by the Master for the case #1, and
if non-zero the Slave device shall wait on resume. In all other cases,
the Slave resume operations can proceed without wait.

The only request tracked so far is Master HardReset, but the request
is declared as a bit mask for future extensions (if needed). The
definition for this value is added in bus.h and does not need to be
exposed in sdw.h

Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191212014507.28050-5-pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
(cherry picked from commit b2bd75f)
Signed-off-by: Chintan Patel <chintan.m.patel@intel.com>

BUG=b:153422295
TEST=No audio regression on TGL/JSL devices

Signed-off-by: Curtis Malainey <cujomalainey@chromium.org>

[ Upstream commit 696ac2e ]

Similar to commit 0266d81 ("acpi/processor: Prevent cpu hotplug
deadlock") except this is for acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_probe():

"The problem is that the work is scheduled on the current CPU from the
hotplug thread associated with that CPU.

It's not required to invoke these functions via the workqueue because
the hotplug thread runs on the target CPU already.

Check whether current is a per cpu thread pinned on the target CPU and
invoke the function directly to avoid the workqueue."

 WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
 ------------------------------------------------------
 cpuhp/1/15 is trying to acquire lock:
 ffffc90003447a28 ((work_completion)(&wfc.work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0x4c6/0x630

 but task is already holding lock:
 ffffffffafa1c0e8 (cpuidle_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cpuidle_pause_and_lock+0x17/0x20

 which lock already depends on the new lock.

 the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

 -> #1 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}:
 cpus_read_lock+0x3e/0xc0
 irq_calc_affinity_vectors+0x5f/0x91
 __pci_enable_msix_range+0x10f/0x9a0
 pci_alloc_irq_vectors_affinity+0x13e/0x1f0
 pci_alloc_irq_vectors_affinity at drivers/pci/msi.c:1208
 pqi_ctrl_init+0x72f/0x1618 [smartpqi]
 pqi_pci_probe.cold.63+0x882/0x892 [smartpqi]
 local_pci_probe+0x7a/0xc0
 work_for_cpu_fn+0x2e/0x50
 process_one_work+0x57e/0xb90
 worker_thread+0x363/0x5b0
 kthread+0x1f4/0x220
 ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50

 -> #0 ((work_completion)(&wfc.work)){+.+.}-{0:0}:
 __lock_acquire+0x2244/0x32a0
 lock_acquire+0x1a2/0x680
 __flush_work+0x4e6/0x630
 work_on_cpu+0x114/0x160
 acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_probe+0x129/0x250
 acpi_processor_evaluate_cst+0x4c8/0x580
 acpi_processor_get_power_info+0x86/0x740
 acpi_processor_hotplug+0xc3/0x140
 acpi_soft_cpu_online+0x102/0x1d0
 cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x197/0x1120
 cpuhp_thread_fun+0x252/0x2f0
 smpboot_thread_fn+0x255/0x440
 kthread+0x1f4/0x220
 ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50

 other info that might help us debug this:

 Chain exists of:
 (work_completion)(&wfc.work) --> cpuhp_state-up --> cpuidle_lock

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

 CPU0                    CPU1
 ----                    ----
 lock(cpuidle_lock);
                         lock(cpuhp_state-up);
                         lock(cpuidle_lock);
 lock((work_completion)(&wfc.work));

 *** DEADLOCK ***

 3 locks held by cpuhp/1/15:
 #0: ffffffffaf51ab10 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: cpuhp_thread_fun+0x69/0x2f0
 #1: ffffffffaf51ad40 (cpuhp_state-up){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: cpuhp_thread_fun+0x69/0x2f0
 #2: ffffffffafa1c0e8 (cpuidle_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cpuidle_pause_and_lock+0x17/0x20

 Call Trace:
 dump_stack+0xa0/0xea
 print_circular_bug.cold.52+0x147/0x14c
 check_noncircular+0x295/0x2d0
 __lock_acquire+0x2244/0x32a0
 lock_acquire+0x1a2/0x680
 __flush_work+0x4e6/0x630
 work_on_cpu+0x114/0x160
 acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_probe+0x129/0x250
 acpi_processor_evaluate_cst+0x4c8/0x580
 acpi_processor_get_power_info+0x86/0x740
 acpi_processor_hotplug+0xc3/0x140
 acpi_soft_cpu_online+0x102/0x1d0
 cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x197/0x1120
 cpuhp_thread_fun+0x252/0x2f0
 smpboot_thread_fn+0x255/0x440
 kthread+0x1f4/0x220
 ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50

Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Tested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
[ rjw: Subject ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

commit d3ec10a upstream.

A lockdep circular locking dependency report was seen when running a
keyutils test:

[12537.027242] ======================================================
[12537.059309] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[12537.088148] 4.18.0-147.7.1.el8_1.x86_64+debug #1 Tainted: G OE    --------- -  -
[12537.125253] ------------------------------------------------------
[12537.153189] keyctl/25598 is trying to acquire lock:
[12537.175087] 000000007c39f96c (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}, at: __might_fault+0xc4/0x1b0
[12537.208365]
[12537.208365] but task is already holding lock:
[12537.234507] 000000003de5b58d (&type->lock_class){++++}, at: keyctl_read_key+0x15a/0x220
[12537.270476]
[12537.270476] which lock already depends on the new lock.
[12537.270476]
[12537.307209]
[12537.307209] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[12537.340754]
[12537.340754] -> #3 (&type->lock_class){++++}:
[12537.367434]        down_write+0x4d/0x110
[12537.385202]        __key_link_begin+0x87/0x280
[12537.405232]        request_key_and_link+0x483/0xf70
[12537.427221]        request_key+0x3c/0x80
[12537.444839]        dns_query+0x1db/0x5a5 [dns_resolver]
[12537.468445]        dns_resolve_server_name_to_ip+0x1e1/0x4d0 [cifs]
[12537.496731]        cifs_reconnect+0xe04/0x2500 [cifs]
[12537.519418]        cifs_readv_from_socket+0x461/0x690 [cifs]
[12537.546263]        cifs_read_from_socket+0xa0/0xe0 [cifs]
[12537.573551]        cifs_demultiplex_thread+0x311/0x2db0 [cifs]
[12537.601045]        kthread+0x30c/0x3d0
[12537.617906]        ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50
[12537.636225]
[12537.636225] -> #2 (root_key_user.cons_lock){+.+.}:
[12537.664525]        __mutex_lock+0x105/0x11f0
[12537.683734]        request_key_and_link+0x35a/0xf70
[12537.705640]        request_key+0x3c/0x80
[12537.723304]        dns_query+0x1db/0x5a5 [dns_resolver]
[12537.746773]        dns_resolve_server_name_to_ip+0x1e1/0x4d0 [cifs]
[12537.775607]        cifs_reconnect+0xe04/0x2500 [cifs]
[12537.798322]        cifs_readv_from_socket+0x461/0x690 [cifs]
[12537.823369]        cifs_read_from_socket+0xa0/0xe0 [cifs]
[12537.847262]        cifs_demultiplex_thread+0x311/0x2db0 [cifs]
[12537.873477]        kthread+0x30c/0x3d0
[12537.890281]        ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50
[12537.908649]
[12537.908649] -> #1 (&tcp_ses->srv_mutex){+.+.}:
[12537.935225]        __mutex_lock+0x105/0x11f0
[12537.954450]        cifs_call_async+0x102/0x7f0 [cifs]
[12537.977250]        smb2_async_readv+0x6c3/0xc90 [cifs]
[12538.000659]        cifs_readpages+0x120a/0x1e50 [cifs]
[12538.023920]        read_pages+0xf5/0x560
[12538.041583]        __do_page_cache_readahead+0x41d/0x4b0
[12538.067047]        ondemand_readahead+0x44c/0xc10
[12538.092069]        filemap_fault+0xec1/0x1830
[12538.111637]        __do_fault+0x82/0x260
[12538.129216]        do_fault+0x419/0xfb0
[12538.146390]        __handle_mm_fault+0x862/0xdf0
[12538.167408]        handle_mm_fault+0x154/0x550
[12538.187401]        __do_page_fault+0x42f/0xa60
[12538.207395]        do_page_fault+0x38/0x5e0
[12538.225777]        page_fault+0x1e/0x30
[12538.243010]
[12538.243010] -> #0 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}:
[12538.267875]        lock_acquire+0x14c/0x420
[12538.286848]        __might_fault+0x119/0x1b0
[12538.306006]        keyring_read_iterator+0x7e/0x170
[12538.327936]        assoc_array_subtree_iterate+0x97/0x280
[12538.352154]        keyring_read+0xe9/0x110
[12538.370558]        keyctl_read_key+0x1b9/0x220
[12538.391470]        do_syscall_64+0xa5/0x4b0
[12538.410511]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6a/0xdf
[12538.435535]
[12538.435535] other info that might help us debug this:
[12538.435535]
[12538.472829] Chain exists of:
[12538.472829]   &mm->mmap_sem --> root_key_user.cons_lock --> &type->lock_class
[12538.472829]
[12538.524820]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[12538.524820]
[12538.551431]        CPU0                    CPU1
[12538.572654]        ----                    ----
[12538.595865]   lock(&type->lock_class);
[12538.613737]                                lock(root_key_user.cons_lock);
[12538.644234]                                lock(&type->lock_class);
[12538.672410]   lock(&mm->mmap_sem);
[12538.687758]
[12538.687758]  *** DEADLOCK ***
[12538.687758]
[12538.714455] 1 lock held by keyctl/25598:
[12538.732097]  #0: 000000003de5b58d (&type->lock_class){++++}, at: keyctl_read_key+0x15a/0x220
[12538.770573]
[12538.770573] stack backtrace:
[12538.790136] CPU: 2 PID: 25598 Comm: keyctl Kdump: loaded Tainted: G
[12538.844855] Hardware name: HP ProLiant DL360 Gen9/ProLiant DL360 Gen9, BIOS P89 12/27/2015
[12538.881963] Call Trace:
[12538.892897]  dump_stack+0x9a/0xf0
[12538.907908]  print_circular_bug.isra.25.cold.50+0x1bc/0x279
[12538.932891]  ? save_trace+0xd6/0x250
[12538.948979]  check_prev_add.constprop.32+0xc36/0x14f0
[12538.971643]  ? keyring_compare_object+0x104/0x190
[12538.992738]  ? check_usage+0x550/0x550
[12539.009845]  ? sched_clock+0x5/0x10
[12539.025484]  ? sched_clock_cpu+0x18/0x1e0
[12539.043555]  __lock_acquire+0x1f12/0x38d0
[12539.061551]  ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x10/0x10
[12539.080554]  lock_acquire+0x14c/0x420
[12539.100330]  ? __might_fault+0xc4/0x1b0
[12539.119079]  __might_fault+0x119/0x1b0
[12539.135869]  ? __might_fault+0xc4/0x1b0
[12539.153234]  keyring_read_iterator+0x7e/0x170
[12539.172787]  ? keyring_read+0x110/0x110
[12539.190059]  assoc_array_subtree_iterate+0x97/0x280
[12539.211526]  keyring_read+0xe9/0x110
[12539.227561]  ? keyring_gc_check_iterator+0xc0/0xc0
[12539.249076]  keyctl_read_key+0x1b9/0x220
[12539.266660]  do_syscall_64+0xa5/0x4b0
[12539.283091]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6a/0xdf

One way to prevent this deadlock scenario from happening is to not
allow writing to userspace while holding the key semaphore. Instead,
an internal buffer is allocated for getting the keys out from the
read method first before copying them out to userspace without holding
the lock.

That requires taking out the __user modifier from all the relevant
read methods as well as additional changes to not use any userspace
write helpers. That is,

  1) The put_user() call is replaced by a direct copy.
  2) The copy_to_user() call is replaced by memcpy().
  3) All the fault handling code is removed.

Compiling on a x86-64 system, the size of the rxrpc_read() function is
reduced from 3795 bytes to 2384 bytes with this patch.

Fixes: ^1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

…init sequences

The Slave device initialization can be split in 4 different cases:

1. Master-initiated hardware reset, system suspend-resume and
pm_runtime based on clock-stop mode1. To avoid timeouts and a bad
audio experience, the Slave device resume operations need to wait for
the Slave device to be re-enumerated and its settings restored.

2. Exit from clock-stop mode0. In this case, the Slave device is
required to remain enumerated and its context preserved while the
clock is stopped, so no re-initialization or wait_for_completion() is
necessary.

3. Slave-initiated pm_runtime D3 transition. With the parent child
relationship, it is possible that a Slave device becomes 'suspended'
while its parent is still 'active' with the bus clock still
toggling. In this case, during the pm_runtime resume operation, there
is no need to wait for any settings to be restored.

4. Slave reset (sync loss or implementation-defined). In that case the
bus remains operational and the Slave device will be re-initialized
when it becomes ATTACHED again.

In previous patches, we suggested the use of wait_for_completion() to
deal with the case #1, but case #2 and #3 do not need any wait.

To account for those differences, this patch adds an unattach_request
field. The field is explicitly set by the Master for the case #1, and
if non-zero the Slave device shall wait on resume. In all other cases,
the Slave resume operations can proceed without wait.

The only request tracked so far is Master HardReset, but the request
is declared as a bit mask for future extensions (if needed). The
definition for this value is added in bus.h and does not need to be
exposed in sdw.h

Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191212014507.28050-5-pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
(cherry picked from commit b2bd75f)
Signed-off-by: Chintan Patel <chintan.m.patel@intel.com>

BUG=b:153422295
TEST=No audio regression on TGL/JSL devices

Signed-off-by: Curtis Malainey <cujomalainey@chromium.org>

commit 056ad39 upstream.

FuzzUSB (a variant of syzkaller) found a free-while-still-in-use bug
in the USB scatter-gather library:

BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in atomic_read
include/asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h:26 [inline]
BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in usb_hcd_unlink_urb+0x5f/0x170
drivers/usb/core/hcd.c:1607
Read of size 4 at addr ffff888065379610 by task kworker/u4:1/27

CPU: 1 PID: 27 Comm: kworker/u4:1 Not tainted 5.5.11 #2
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS
1.10.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014
Workqueue: scsi_tmf_2 scmd_eh_abort_handler
Call Trace:
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline]
 dump_stack+0xce/0x128 lib/dump_stack.c:118
 print_address_description.constprop.4+0x21/0x3c0 mm/kasan/report.c:374
 __kasan_report+0x153/0x1cb mm/kasan/report.c:506
 kasan_report+0x12/0x20 mm/kasan/common.c:639
 check_memory_region_inline mm/kasan/generic.c:185 [inline]
 check_memory_region+0x152/0x1b0 mm/kasan/generic.c:192
 __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20 mm/kasan/common.c:95
 atomic_read include/asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h:26 [inline]
 usb_hcd_unlink_urb+0x5f/0x170 drivers/usb/core/hcd.c:1607
 usb_unlink_urb+0x72/0xb0 drivers/usb/core/urb.c:657
 usb_sg_cancel+0x14e/0x290 drivers/usb/core/message.c:602
 usb_stor_stop_transport+0x5e/0xa0 drivers/usb/storage/transport.c:937

This bug occurs when cancellation of the S-G transfer races with
transfer completion.  When that happens, usb_sg_cancel() may continue
to access the transfer's URBs after usb_sg_wait() has freed them.

The bug is caused by the fact that usb_sg_cancel() does not take any
sort of reference to the transfer, and so there is nothing to prevent
the URBs from being deallocated while the routine is trying to use
them.  The fix is to take such a reference by incrementing the
transfer's io->count field while the cancellation is in progres and
decrementing it afterward.  The transfer's URBs are not deallocated
until io->complete is triggered, which happens when io->count reaches
zero.

Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Reported-and-tested-by: Kyungtae Kim <kt0755@gmail.com>
CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/Pine.LNX.4.44L0.2003281615140.14837-100000@netrider.rowland.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

…f fs_info::journal_info

commit fcc9973 upstream.

[BUG]
One run of btrfs/063 triggered the following lockdep warning:
  ============================================
  WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
  5.6.0-rc7-custom+ thesofproject#48 Not tainted
  --------------------------------------------
  kworker/u24:0/7 is trying to acquire lock:
  ffff88817d3a46e0 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}, at: start_transaction+0x66c/0x890 [btrfs]

  but task is already holding lock:
  ffff88817d3a46e0 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}, at: start_transaction+0x66c/0x890 [btrfs]

  other info that might help us debug this:
   Possible unsafe locking scenario:

         CPU0
         ----
    lock(sb_internal#2);
    lock(sb_internal#2);

   *** DEADLOCK ***

   May be due to missing lock nesting notation

  4 locks held by kworker/u24:0/7:
   #0: ffff88817b495948 ((wq_completion)btrfs-endio-write){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x557/0xb80
   #1: ffff888189ea7db8 ((work_completion)(&work->normal_work)){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x557/0xb80
   #2: ffff88817d3a46e0 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}, at: start_transaction+0x66c/0x890 [btrfs]
   #3: ffff888174ca4da8 (&fs_info->reloc_mutex){+.+.}, at: btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x83/0xd0 [btrfs]

  stack backtrace:
  CPU: 0 PID: 7 Comm: kworker/u24:0 Not tainted 5.6.0-rc7-custom+ thesofproject#48
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015
  Workqueue: btrfs-endio-write btrfs_work_helper [btrfs]
  Call Trace:
   dump_stack+0xc2/0x11a
   __lock_acquire.cold+0xce/0x214
   lock_acquire+0xe6/0x210
   __sb_start_write+0x14e/0x290
   start_transaction+0x66c/0x890 [btrfs]
   btrfs_join_transaction+0x1d/0x20 [btrfs]
   find_free_extent+0x1504/0x1a50 [btrfs]
   btrfs_reserve_extent+0xd5/0x1f0 [btrfs]
   btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x1ac/0x570 [btrfs]
   btrfs_copy_root+0x213/0x580 [btrfs]
   create_reloc_root+0x3bd/0x470 [btrfs]
   btrfs_init_reloc_root+0x2d2/0x310 [btrfs]
   record_root_in_trans+0x191/0x1d0 [btrfs]
   btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x90/0xd0 [btrfs]
   start_transaction+0x16e/0x890 [btrfs]
   btrfs_join_transaction+0x1d/0x20 [btrfs]
   btrfs_finish_ordered_io+0x55d/0xcd0 [btrfs]
   finish_ordered_fn+0x15/0x20 [btrfs]
   btrfs_work_helper+0x116/0x9a0 [btrfs]
   process_one_work+0x632/0xb80
   worker_thread+0x80/0x690
   kthread+0x1a3/0x1f0
   ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50

It's pretty hard to reproduce, only one hit so far.

[CAUSE]
This is because we're calling btrfs_join_transaction() without re-using
the current running one:

btrfs_finish_ordered_io()
|- btrfs_join_transaction()		<<< Call #1
   |- btrfs_record_root_in_trans()
      |- btrfs_reserve_extent()
	 |- btrfs_join_transaction()	<<< Call #2

Normally such btrfs_join_transaction() call should re-use the existing
one, without trying to re-start a transaction.

But the problem is, in btrfs_join_transaction() call #1, we call
btrfs_record_root_in_trans() before initializing current::journal_info.

And in btrfs_join_transaction() call #2, we're relying on
current::journal_info to avoid such deadlock.

[FIX]
Call btrfs_record_root_in_trans() after we have initialized
current::journal_info.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

We have a number of "uart.port->desc.lock vs desc.lock->uart.port"
lockdep reports coming from 8250 driver; this causes a bit of trouble
to people, so let's fix it.

The problem is reverse lock order in two different call paths:

chain #1:

 serial8250_do_startup()
  spin_lock_irqsave(&port->lock);
   disable_irq_nosync(port->irq);
    raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock)

chain #2:

  __report_bad_irq()
   raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock)
    for_each_action_of_desc()
     printk()
      spin_lock_irqsave(&port->lock);

Fix this by changing the order of locks in serial8250_do_startup():
 do disable_irq_nosync() first, which grabs desc->lock, and grab
 uart->port after that, so that chain #1 and chain #2 have same lock
 order.

Full lockdep splat:

 ======================================================
 WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
 5.4.39 thesofproject#55 Not tainted
 ======================================================

 swapper/0/0 is trying to acquire lock:
 ffffffffab65b6c0 (console_owner){-...}, at: console_lock_spinning_enable+0x31/0x57

 but task is already holding lock:
 ffff88810a8e34c0 (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}, at: __report_bad_irq+0x5b/0xba

 which lock already depends on the new lock.

 the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

 -> #2 (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}:
        _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x61/0x8d
        __irq_get_desc_lock+0x65/0x89
        __disable_irq_nosync+0x3b/0x93
        serial8250_do_startup+0x451/0x75c
        uart_startup+0x1b4/0x2ff
        uart_port_activate+0x73/0xa0
        tty_port_open+0xae/0x10a
        uart_open+0x1b/0x26
        tty_open+0x24d/0x3a0
        chrdev_open+0xd5/0x1cc
        do_dentry_open+0x299/0x3c8
        path_openat+0x434/0x1100
        do_filp_open+0x9b/0x10a
        do_sys_open+0x15f/0x3d7
        kernel_init_freeable+0x157/0x1dd
        kernel_init+0xe/0x105
        ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50

 -> #1 (&port_lock_key){-.-.}:
        _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x61/0x8d
        serial8250_console_write+0xa7/0x2a0
        console_unlock+0x3b7/0x528
        vprintk_emit+0x111/0x17f
        printk+0x59/0x73
        register_console+0x336/0x3a4
        uart_add_one_port+0x51b/0x5be
        serial8250_register_8250_port+0x454/0x55e
        dw8250_probe+0x4dc/0x5b9
        platform_drv_probe+0x67/0x8b
        really_probe+0x14a/0x422
        driver_probe_device+0x66/0x130
        device_driver_attach+0x42/0x5b
        __driver_attach+0xca/0x139
        bus_for_each_dev+0x97/0xc9
        bus_add_driver+0x12b/0x228
        driver_register+0x64/0xed
        do_one_initcall+0x20c/0x4a6
        do_initcall_level+0xb5/0xc5
        do_basic_setup+0x4c/0x58
        kernel_init_freeable+0x13f/0x1dd
        kernel_init+0xe/0x105
        ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50

 -> #0 (console_owner){-...}:
        __lock_acquire+0x118d/0x2714
        lock_acquire+0x203/0x258
        console_lock_spinning_enable+0x51/0x57
        console_unlock+0x25d/0x528
        vprintk_emit+0x111/0x17f
        printk+0x59/0x73
        __report_bad_irq+0xa3/0xba
        note_interrupt+0x19a/0x1d6
        handle_irq_event_percpu+0x57/0x79
        handle_irq_event+0x36/0x55
        handle_fasteoi_irq+0xc2/0x18a
        do_IRQ+0xb3/0x157
        ret_from_intr+0x0/0x1d
        cpuidle_enter_state+0x12f/0x1fd
        cpuidle_enter+0x2e/0x3d
        do_idle+0x1ce/0x2ce
        cpu_startup_entry+0x1d/0x1f
        start_kernel+0x406/0x46a
        secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0

 other info that might help us debug this:

 Chain exists of:
   console_owner --> &port_lock_key --> &irq_desc_lock_class

  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

        CPU0                    CPU1
        ----                    ----
   lock(&irq_desc_lock_class);
                                lock(&port_lock_key);
                                lock(&irq_desc_lock_class);
   lock(console_owner);

  *** DEADLOCK ***

 2 locks held by swapper/0/0:
  #0: ffff88810a8e34c0 (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}, at: __report_bad_irq+0x5b/0xba
  #1: ffffffffab65b5c0 (console_lock){+.+.}, at: console_trylock_spinning+0x20/0x181

 stack backtrace:
 CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.4.39 thesofproject#55
 Hardware name: XXXXXX
 Call Trace:
  <IRQ>
  dump_stack+0xbf/0x133
  ? print_circular_bug+0xd6/0xe9
  check_noncircular+0x1b9/0x1c3
  __lock_acquire+0x118d/0x2714
  lock_acquire+0x203/0x258
  ? console_lock_spinning_enable+0x31/0x57
  console_lock_spinning_enable+0x51/0x57
  ? console_lock_spinning_enable+0x31/0x57
  console_unlock+0x25d/0x528
  ? console_trylock+0x18/0x4e
  vprintk_emit+0x111/0x17f
  ? lock_acquire+0x203/0x258
  printk+0x59/0x73
  __report_bad_irq+0xa3/0xba
  note_interrupt+0x19a/0x1d6
  handle_irq_event_percpu+0x57/0x79
  handle_irq_event+0x36/0x55
  handle_fasteoi_irq+0xc2/0x18a
  do_IRQ+0xb3/0x157
  common_interrupt+0xf/0xf
  </IRQ>

Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Fixes: 768aec0 ("serial: 8250: fix shared interrupts issues with SMP and RT kernels")
Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Reported-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@google.com>
BugLink: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1114800
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHQZ30BnfX+gxjPm1DUd5psOTqbyDh4EJE=2=VAMW_VDafctkA@mail.gmail.com/T/#u
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
(am from https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1287864/)
(also found at https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200817022646.1484638-1-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com)

BUG=chromium:1114800
TEST=Boot on Octopus with USE="pcserial debug" enabled

Change-Id: I5615162196aca3751282f61a97172c46ac7d7fba
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/2354639
Reviewed-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Raul E Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>

[ Upstream commit e24c644 ]

I compiled with AddressSanitizer and I had these memory leaks while I
was using the tep_parse_format function:

    Direct leak of 28 byte(s) in 4 object(s) allocated from:
        #0 0x7fb07db49ffe in __interceptor_realloc (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.5+0x10dffe)
        #1 0x7fb07a724228 in extend_token /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:985
        #2 0x7fb07a724c21 in __read_token /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:1140
        #3 0x7fb07a724f78 in read_token /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:1206
        thesofproject#4 0x7fb07a725191 in __read_expect_type /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:1291
        thesofproject#5 0x7fb07a7251df in read_expect_type /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:1299
        thesofproject#6 0x7fb07a72e6c8 in process_dynamic_array_len /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:2849
        thesofproject#7 0x7fb07a7304b8 in process_function /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:3161
        thesofproject#8 0x7fb07a730900 in process_arg_token /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:3207
        thesofproject#9 0x7fb07a727c0b in process_arg /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:1786
        thesofproject#10 0x7fb07a731080 in event_read_print_args /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:3285
        thesofproject#11 0x7fb07a731722 in event_read_print /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:3369
        thesofproject#12 0x7fb07a740054 in __tep_parse_format /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:6335
        thesofproject#13 0x7fb07a74047a in __parse_event /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:6389
        thesofproject#14 0x7fb07a740536 in tep_parse_format /home/pduplessis/repo/linux/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c:6431
        thesofproject#15 0x7fb07a785acf in parse_event ../../../src/fs-src/fs.c:251
        thesofproject#16 0x7fb07a785ccd in parse_systems ../../../src/fs-src/fs.c:284
        thesofproject#17 0x7fb07a786fb3 in read_metadata ../../../src/fs-src/fs.c:593
        thesofproject#18 0x7fb07a78760e in ftrace_fs_source_init ../../../src/fs-src/fs.c:727
        thesofproject#19 0x7fb07d90c19c in add_component_with_init_method_data ../../../../src/lib/graph/graph.c:1048
        thesofproject#20 0x7fb07d90c87b in add_source_component_with_initialize_method_data ../../../../src/lib/graph/graph.c:1127
        thesofproject#21 0x7fb07d90c92a in bt_graph_add_source_component ../../../../src/lib/graph/graph.c:1152
        thesofproject#22 0x55db11aa632e in cmd_run_ctx_create_components_from_config_components ../../../src/cli/babeltrace2.c:2252
        thesofproject#23 0x55db11aa6fda in cmd_run_ctx_create_components ../../../src/cli/babeltrace2.c:2347
        thesofproject#24 0x55db11aa780c in cmd_run ../../../src/cli/babeltrace2.c:2461
        thesofproject#25 0x55db11aa8a7d in main ../../../src/cli/babeltrace2.c:2673
        thesofproject#26 0x7fb07d5460b2 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x270b2)

The token variable in the process_dynamic_array_len function is
allocated in the read_expect_type function, but is not freed before
calling the read_token function.

Free the token variable before calling read_token in order to plug the
leak.

Signed-off-by: Philippe Duplessis-Guindon <pduplessis@efficios.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-trace-devel/20200730150236.5392-1-pduplessis@efficios.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit 5a25de6 ]

Freeing chip on error may lead to an Oops at the next time
the system goes to resume. Fix this by removing all
snd_echo_free() calls on error.

Fixes: 47b5d02 ("ALSA: Echoaudio - Add suspend support #2")
Signed-off-by: Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200813074632.17022-1-dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit a47bd78 ]

Dave hit this splat during testing btrfs/078:

  ======================================================
  WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
  5.8.0-rc6-default+ thesofproject#1191 Not tainted
  ------------------------------------------------------
  kswapd0/75 is trying to acquire lock:
  ffffa040e9d04ff8 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x310 [btrfs]

  but task is already holding lock:
  ffffffff8b0c8040 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30

  which lock already depends on the new lock.

  the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

  -> #2 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}:
	 __lock_acquire+0x56f/0xaa0
	 lock_acquire+0xa3/0x440
	 fs_reclaim_acquire.part.0+0x25/0x30
	 __kmalloc_track_caller+0x49/0x330
	 kstrdup+0x2e/0x60
	 __kernfs_new_node.constprop.0+0x44/0x250
	 kernfs_new_node+0x25/0x50
	 kernfs_create_link+0x34/0xa0
	 sysfs_do_create_link_sd+0x5e/0xd0
	 btrfs_sysfs_add_devices_dir+0x65/0x100 [btrfs]
	 btrfs_init_new_device+0x44c/0x12b0 [btrfs]
	 btrfs_ioctl+0xc3c/0x25c0 [btrfs]
	 ksys_ioctl+0x68/0xa0
	 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
	 do_syscall_64+0x50/0xe0
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

  -> #1 (&fs_info->chunk_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
	 __lock_acquire+0x56f/0xaa0
	 lock_acquire+0xa3/0x440
	 __mutex_lock+0xa0/0xaf0
	 btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x137/0x3e0 [btrfs]
	 find_free_extent+0xb44/0xfb0 [btrfs]
	 btrfs_reserve_extent+0x9b/0x180 [btrfs]
	 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xc1/0x350 [btrfs]
	 alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4a/0x60 [btrfs]
	 __btrfs_cow_block+0x143/0x7a0 [btrfs]
	 btrfs_cow_block+0x15f/0x310 [btrfs]
	 push_leaf_right+0x150/0x240 [btrfs]
	 split_leaf+0x3cd/0x6d0 [btrfs]
	 btrfs_search_slot+0xd14/0xf70 [btrfs]
	 btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x64/0xc0 [btrfs]
	 __btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_items+0xb2/0x840 [btrfs]
	 btrfs_async_run_delayed_root+0x10e/0x1d0 [btrfs]
	 btrfs_work_helper+0x2f9/0x650 [btrfs]
	 process_one_work+0x22c/0x600
	 worker_thread+0x50/0x3b0
	 kthread+0x137/0x150
	 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

  -> #0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
	 check_prev_add+0x98/0xa20
	 validate_chain+0xa8c/0x2a00
	 __lock_acquire+0x56f/0xaa0
	 lock_acquire+0xa3/0x440
	 __mutex_lock+0xa0/0xaf0
	 __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x310 [btrfs]
	 btrfs_evict_inode+0x3bf/0x560 [btrfs]
	 evict+0xd6/0x1c0
	 dispose_list+0x48/0x70
	 prune_icache_sb+0x54/0x80
	 super_cache_scan+0x121/0x1a0
	 do_shrink_slab+0x175/0x420
	 shrink_slab+0xb1/0x2e0
	 shrink_node+0x192/0x600
	 balance_pgdat+0x31f/0x750
	 kswapd+0x206/0x510
	 kthread+0x137/0x150
	 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

  other info that might help us debug this:

  Chain exists of:
    &delayed_node->mutex --> &fs_info->chunk_mutex --> fs_reclaim

   Possible unsafe locking scenario:

	 CPU0                    CPU1
	 ----                    ----
    lock(fs_reclaim);
				 lock(&fs_info->chunk_mutex);
				 lock(fs_reclaim);
    lock(&delayed_node->mutex);

   *** DEADLOCK ***

  3 locks held by kswapd0/75:
   #0: ffffffff8b0c8040 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30
   #1: ffffffff8b0b50b8 (shrinker_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: shrink_slab+0x54/0x2e0
   #2: ffffa040e057c0e8 (&type->s_umount_key#26){++++}-{3:3}, at: trylock_super+0x16/0x50

  stack backtrace:
  CPU: 2 PID: 75 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 5.8.0-rc6-default+ thesofproject#1191
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba527-rebuilt.opensuse.org 04/01/2014
  Call Trace:
   dump_stack+0x78/0xa0
   check_noncircular+0x16f/0x190
   check_prev_add+0x98/0xa20
   validate_chain+0xa8c/0x2a00
   __lock_acquire+0x56f/0xaa0
   lock_acquire+0xa3/0x440
   ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x310 [btrfs]
   __mutex_lock+0xa0/0xaf0
   ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x310 [btrfs]
   ? __lock_acquire+0x56f/0xaa0
   ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x310 [btrfs]
   ? lock_acquire+0xa3/0x440
   ? btrfs_evict_inode+0x138/0x560 [btrfs]
   ? btrfs_evict_inode+0x2fe/0x560 [btrfs]
   ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x310 [btrfs]
   __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x310 [btrfs]
   btrfs_evict_inode+0x3bf/0x560 [btrfs]
   evict+0xd6/0x1c0
   dispose_list+0x48/0x70
   prune_icache_sb+0x54/0x80
   super_cache_scan+0x121/0x1a0
   do_shrink_slab+0x175/0x420
   shrink_slab+0xb1/0x2e0
   shrink_node+0x192/0x600
   balance_pgdat+0x31f/0x750
   kswapd+0x206/0x510
   ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3e/0x50
   ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90
   ? balance_pgdat+0x750/0x750
   kthread+0x137/0x150
   ? kthread_stop+0x2a0/0x2a0
   ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

This is because we're holding the chunk_mutex while adding this device
and adding its sysfs entries.  We actually hold different locks in
different places when calling this function, the dev_replace semaphore
for instance in dev replace, so instead of moving this call around
simply wrap it's operations in NOFS.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Reported-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

commit 205d300 upstream.

We have a number of "uart.port->desc.lock vs desc.lock->uart.port"
lockdep reports coming from 8250 driver; this causes a bit of trouble
to people, so let's fix it.

The problem is reverse lock order in two different call paths:

chain #1:

 serial8250_do_startup()
  spin_lock_irqsave(&port->lock);
   disable_irq_nosync(port->irq);
    raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock)

chain #2:

  __report_bad_irq()
   raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock)
    for_each_action_of_desc()
     printk()
      spin_lock_irqsave(&port->lock);

Fix this by changing the order of locks in serial8250_do_startup():
 do disable_irq_nosync() first, which grabs desc->lock, and grab
 uart->port after that, so that chain #1 and chain #2 have same lock
 order.

Full lockdep splat:

 ======================================================
 WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
 5.4.39 thesofproject#55 Not tainted
 ======================================================

 swapper/0/0 is trying to acquire lock:
 ffffffffab65b6c0 (console_owner){-...}, at: console_lock_spinning_enable+0x31/0x57

 but task is already holding lock:
 ffff88810a8e34c0 (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}, at: __report_bad_irq+0x5b/0xba

 which lock already depends on the new lock.

 the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

 -> #2 (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}:
        _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x61/0x8d
        __irq_get_desc_lock+0x65/0x89
        __disable_irq_nosync+0x3b/0x93
        serial8250_do_startup+0x451/0x75c
        uart_startup+0x1b4/0x2ff
        uart_port_activate+0x73/0xa0
        tty_port_open+0xae/0x10a
        uart_open+0x1b/0x26
        tty_open+0x24d/0x3a0
        chrdev_open+0xd5/0x1cc
        do_dentry_open+0x299/0x3c8
        path_openat+0x434/0x1100
        do_filp_open+0x9b/0x10a
        do_sys_open+0x15f/0x3d7
        kernel_init_freeable+0x157/0x1dd
        kernel_init+0xe/0x105
        ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50

 -> #1 (&port_lock_key){-.-.}:
        _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x61/0x8d
        serial8250_console_write+0xa7/0x2a0
        console_unlock+0x3b7/0x528
        vprintk_emit+0x111/0x17f
        printk+0x59/0x73
        register_console+0x336/0x3a4
        uart_add_one_port+0x51b/0x5be
        serial8250_register_8250_port+0x454/0x55e
        dw8250_probe+0x4dc/0x5b9
        platform_drv_probe+0x67/0x8b
        really_probe+0x14a/0x422
        driver_probe_device+0x66/0x130
        device_driver_attach+0x42/0x5b
        __driver_attach+0xca/0x139
        bus_for_each_dev+0x97/0xc9
        bus_add_driver+0x12b/0x228
        driver_register+0x64/0xed
        do_one_initcall+0x20c/0x4a6
        do_initcall_level+0xb5/0xc5
        do_basic_setup+0x4c/0x58
        kernel_init_freeable+0x13f/0x1dd
        kernel_init+0xe/0x105
        ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50

 -> #0 (console_owner){-...}:
        __lock_acquire+0x118d/0x2714
        lock_acquire+0x203/0x258
        console_lock_spinning_enable+0x51/0x57
        console_unlock+0x25d/0x528
        vprintk_emit+0x111/0x17f
        printk+0x59/0x73
        __report_bad_irq+0xa3/0xba
        note_interrupt+0x19a/0x1d6
        handle_irq_event_percpu+0x57/0x79
        handle_irq_event+0x36/0x55
        handle_fasteoi_irq+0xc2/0x18a
        do_IRQ+0xb3/0x157
        ret_from_intr+0x0/0x1d
        cpuidle_enter_state+0x12f/0x1fd
        cpuidle_enter+0x2e/0x3d
        do_idle+0x1ce/0x2ce
        cpu_startup_entry+0x1d/0x1f
        start_kernel+0x406/0x46a
        secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0

 other info that might help us debug this:

 Chain exists of:
   console_owner --> &port_lock_key --> &irq_desc_lock_class

  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

        CPU0                    CPU1
        ----                    ----
   lock(&irq_desc_lock_class);
                                lock(&port_lock_key);
                                lock(&irq_desc_lock_class);
   lock(console_owner);

  *** DEADLOCK ***

 2 locks held by swapper/0/0:
  #0: ffff88810a8e34c0 (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}, at: __report_bad_irq+0x5b/0xba
  #1: ffffffffab65b5c0 (console_lock){+.+.}, at: console_trylock_spinning+0x20/0x181

 stack backtrace:
 CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.4.39 thesofproject#55
 Hardware name: XXXXXX
 Call Trace:
  <IRQ>
  dump_stack+0xbf/0x133
  ? print_circular_bug+0xd6/0xe9
  check_noncircular+0x1b9/0x1c3
  __lock_acquire+0x118d/0x2714
  lock_acquire+0x203/0x258
  ? console_lock_spinning_enable+0x31/0x57
  console_lock_spinning_enable+0x51/0x57
  ? console_lock_spinning_enable+0x31/0x57
  console_unlock+0x25d/0x528
  ? console_trylock+0x18/0x4e
  vprintk_emit+0x111/0x17f
  ? lock_acquire+0x203/0x258
  printk+0x59/0x73
  __report_bad_irq+0xa3/0xba
  note_interrupt+0x19a/0x1d6
  handle_irq_event_percpu+0x57/0x79
  handle_irq_event+0x36/0x55
  handle_fasteoi_irq+0xc2/0x18a
  do_IRQ+0xb3/0x157
  common_interrupt+0xf/0xf
  </IRQ>

Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Fixes: 768aec0 ("serial: 8250: fix shared interrupts issues with SMP and RT kernels")
Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Reported-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@google.com>
BugLink: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1114800
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHQZ30BnfX+gxjPm1DUd5psOTqbyDh4EJE=2=VAMW_VDafctkA@mail.gmail.com/T/#u
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200817022646.1484638-1-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

[ Upstream commit a48b73e ]

With the conversion of the tree locks to rwsem I got the following
lockdep splat:

  ======================================================
  WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
  5.8.0-rc7-00165-g04ec4da5f45f-dirty thesofproject#922 Not tainted
  ------------------------------------------------------
  compsize/11122 is trying to acquire lock:
  ffff889fabca8768 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}, at: __might_fault+0x3e/0x90

  but task is already holding lock:
  ffff889fe720fe40 (btrfs-fs-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180

  which lock already depends on the new lock.

  the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

  -> #2 (btrfs-fs-00){++++}-{3:3}:
	 down_write_nested+0x3b/0x70
	 __btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x120
	 btrfs_search_slot+0x756/0x990
	 btrfs_lookup_inode+0x3a/0xb4
	 __btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x93/0x270
	 btrfs_async_run_delayed_root+0x168/0x230
	 btrfs_work_helper+0xd4/0x570
	 process_one_work+0x2ad/0x5f0
	 worker_thread+0x3a/0x3d0
	 kthread+0x133/0x150
	 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

  -> #1 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
	 __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930
	 btrfs_delayed_update_inode+0x50/0x440
	 btrfs_update_inode+0x8a/0xf0
	 btrfs_dirty_inode+0x5b/0xd0
	 touch_atime+0xa1/0xd0
	 btrfs_file_mmap+0x3f/0x60
	 mmap_region+0x3a4/0x640
	 do_mmap+0x376/0x580
	 vm_mmap_pgoff+0xd5/0x120
	 ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x193/0x230
	 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

  -> #0 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}:
	 __lock_acquire+0x1272/0x2310
	 lock_acquire+0x9e/0x360
	 __might_fault+0x68/0x90
	 _copy_to_user+0x1e/0x80
	 copy_to_sk.isra.32+0x121/0x300
	 search_ioctl+0x106/0x200
	 btrfs_ioctl_tree_search_v2+0x7b/0xf0
	 btrfs_ioctl+0x106f/0x30a0
	 ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0
	 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
	 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

  other info that might help us debug this:

  Chain exists of:
    &mm->mmap_lock#2 --> &delayed_node->mutex --> btrfs-fs-00

   Possible unsafe locking scenario:

	 CPU0                    CPU1
	 ----                    ----
    lock(btrfs-fs-00);
				 lock(&delayed_node->mutex);
				 lock(btrfs-fs-00);
    lock(&mm->mmap_lock#2);

   *** DEADLOCK ***

  1 lock held by compsize/11122:
   #0: ffff889fe720fe40 (btrfs-fs-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180

  stack backtrace:
  CPU: 17 PID: 11122 Comm: compsize Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.8.0-rc7-00165-g04ec4da5f45f-dirty thesofproject#922
  Hardware name: Quanta Tioga Pass Single Side 01-0030993006/Tioga Pass Single Side, BIOS F08_3A18 12/20/2018
  Call Trace:
   dump_stack+0x78/0xa0
   check_noncircular+0x165/0x180
   __lock_acquire+0x1272/0x2310
   lock_acquire+0x9e/0x360
   ? __might_fault+0x3e/0x90
   ? find_held_lock+0x72/0x90
   __might_fault+0x68/0x90
   ? __might_fault+0x3e/0x90
   _copy_to_user+0x1e/0x80
   copy_to_sk.isra.32+0x121/0x300
   ? btrfs_search_forward+0x2a6/0x360
   search_ioctl+0x106/0x200
   btrfs_ioctl_tree_search_v2+0x7b/0xf0
   btrfs_ioctl+0x106f/0x30a0
   ? __do_sys_newfstat+0x5a/0x70
   ? ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0
   ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0
   __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
   do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

The problem is we're doing a copy_to_user() while holding tree locks,
which can deadlock if we have to do a page fault for the copy_to_user().
This exists even without my locking changes, so it needs to be fixed.
Rework the search ioctl to do the pre-fault and then
copy_to_user_nofault for the copying.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

commit fccc000 upstream.

Nikolay reported a lockdep splat in generic/476 that I could reproduce
with btrfs/187.

  ======================================================
  WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
  5.9.0-rc2+ #1 Tainted: G        W
  ------------------------------------------------------
  kswapd0/100 is trying to acquire lock:
  ffff9e8ef38b6268 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330

  but task is already holding lock:
  ffffffffa9d74700 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30

  which lock already depends on the new lock.

  the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

  -> #2 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}:
	 fs_reclaim_acquire+0x65/0x80
	 slab_pre_alloc_hook.constprop.0+0x20/0x200
	 kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x3a/0x1a0
	 btrfs_alloc_device+0x43/0x210
	 add_missing_dev+0x20/0x90
	 read_one_chunk+0x301/0x430
	 btrfs_read_sys_array+0x17b/0x1b0
	 open_ctree+0xa62/0x1896
	 btrfs_mount_root.cold+0x12/0xea
	 legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50
	 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0
	 vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x71/0xb0
	 btrfs_mount+0x10d/0x379
	 legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50
	 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0
	 path_mount+0x434/0xc00
	 __x64_sys_mount+0xe3/0x120
	 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

  -> #1 (&fs_info->chunk_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
	 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0
	 btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x125/0x3a0
	 find_free_extent+0xdf6/0x1210
	 btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb3/0x1b0
	 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb0/0x310
	 alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4a/0x60
	 __btrfs_cow_block+0x11a/0x530
	 btrfs_cow_block+0x104/0x220
	 btrfs_search_slot+0x52e/0x9d0
	 btrfs_lookup_inode+0x2a/0x8f
	 __btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x80/0x240
	 btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_inode+0x119/0x120
	 btrfs_evict_inode+0x357/0x500
	 evict+0xcf/0x1f0
	 vfs_rmdir.part.0+0x149/0x160
	 do_rmdir+0x136/0x1a0
	 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

  -> #0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
	 __lock_acquire+0x1184/0x1fa0
	 lock_acquire+0xa4/0x3d0
	 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0
	 __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330
	 btrfs_evict_inode+0x24c/0x500
	 evict+0xcf/0x1f0
	 dispose_list+0x48/0x70
	 prune_icache_sb+0x44/0x50
	 super_cache_scan+0x161/0x1e0
	 do_shrink_slab+0x178/0x3c0
	 shrink_slab+0x17c/0x290
	 shrink_node+0x2b2/0x6d0
	 balance_pgdat+0x30a/0x670
	 kswapd+0x213/0x4c0
	 kthread+0x138/0x160
	 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

  other info that might help us debug this:

  Chain exists of:
    &delayed_node->mutex --> &fs_info->chunk_mutex --> fs_reclaim

   Possible unsafe locking scenario:

	 CPU0                    CPU1
	 ----                    ----
    lock(fs_reclaim);
				 lock(&fs_info->chunk_mutex);
				 lock(fs_reclaim);
    lock(&delayed_node->mutex);

   *** DEADLOCK ***

  3 locks held by kswapd0/100:
   #0: ffffffffa9d74700 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30
   #1: ffffffffa9d65c50 (shrinker_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: shrink_slab+0x115/0x290
   #2: ffff9e8e9da260e0 (&type->s_umount_key#48){++++}-{3:3}, at: super_cache_scan+0x38/0x1e0

  stack backtrace:
  CPU: 1 PID: 100 Comm: kswapd0 Tainted: G        W         5.9.0-rc2+ #1
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014
  Call Trace:
   dump_stack+0x92/0xc8
   check_noncircular+0x12d/0x150
   __lock_acquire+0x1184/0x1fa0
   lock_acquire+0xa4/0x3d0
   ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330
   __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0
   ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330
   ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330
   ? lock_acquire+0xa4/0x3d0
   ? btrfs_evict_inode+0x11e/0x500
   ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80
   __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330
   btrfs_evict_inode+0x24c/0x500
   evict+0xcf/0x1f0
   dispose_list+0x48/0x70
   prune_icache_sb+0x44/0x50
   super_cache_scan+0x161/0x1e0
   do_shrink_slab+0x178/0x3c0
   shrink_slab+0x17c/0x290
   shrink_node+0x2b2/0x6d0
   balance_pgdat+0x30a/0x670
   kswapd+0x213/0x4c0
   ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x46/0x60
   ? add_wait_queue_exclusive+0x70/0x70
   ? balance_pgdat+0x670/0x670
   kthread+0x138/0x160
   ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x40/0x40
   ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

This is because we are holding the chunk_mutex when we call
btrfs_alloc_device, which does a GFP_KERNEL allocation.  We don't want
to switch that to a GFP_NOFS lock because this is the only place where
it matters.  So instead use memalloc_nofs_save() around the allocation
in order to avoid the lockdep splat.

Reported-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

[ Upstream commit d26383d ]

The following leaks were detected by ASAN:

  Indirect leak of 360 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
    #0 0x7fecc305180e in calloc (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.5+0x10780e)
    #1 0x560578f6dce5 in perf_pmu__new_format util/pmu.c:1333
    #2 0x560578f752fc in perf_pmu_parse util/pmu.y:59
    #3 0x560578f6a8b7 in perf_pmu__format_parse util/pmu.c:73
    thesofproject#4 0x560578e07045 in test__pmu tests/pmu.c:155
    thesofproject#5 0x560578de109b in run_test tests/builtin-test.c:410
    thesofproject#6 0x560578de109b in test_and_print tests/builtin-test.c:440
    thesofproject#7 0x560578de401a in __cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:661
    thesofproject#8 0x560578de401a in cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:807
    thesofproject#9 0x560578e49354 in run_builtin /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:312
    thesofproject#10 0x560578ce71a8 in handle_internal_command /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:364
    thesofproject#11 0x560578ce71a8 in run_argv /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:408
    thesofproject#12 0x560578ce71a8 in main /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:538
    thesofproject#13 0x7fecc2b7acc9 in __libc_start_main ../csu/libc-start.c:308

Fixes: cff7f95 ("perf tests: Move pmu tests into separate object")
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200915031819.386559-12-namhyung@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

…during probe

[ Upstream commit 4ce35a3 ]

When booting j721e the following bug is printed:

[    1.154821] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/sched/completion.c:99
[    1.154827] in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 128, non_block: 0, pid: 12, name: kworker/0:1
[    1.154832] 3 locks held by kworker/0:1/12:
[    1.154836]  #0: ffff000840030728 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x1d4/0x6e8
[    1.154852]  #1: ffff80001214fdd8 (deferred_probe_work){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x1d4/0x6e8
[    1.154860]  #2: ffff00084060b170 (&dev->mutex){....}, at: __device_attach+0x38/0x138
[    1.154872] irq event stamp: 63096
[    1.154881] hardirqs last  enabled at (63095): [<ffff800010b74318>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x70/0x78
[    1.154887] hardirqs last disabled at (63096): [<ffff800010b740d8>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x28/0x80
[    1.154893] softirqs last  enabled at (62254): [<ffff800010080c88>] _stext+0x488/0x564
[    1.154899] softirqs last disabled at (62247): [<ffff8000100fdb3c>] irq_exit+0x114/0x140
[    1.154906] CPU: 0 PID: 12 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 5.6.0-rc6-next-20200318-00094-g45e4089b0bd3 thesofproject#221
[    1.154911] Hardware name: Texas Instruments K3 J721E SoC (DT)
[    1.154917] Workqueue: events deferred_probe_work_func
[    1.154923] Call trace:
[    1.154928]  dump_backtrace+0x0/0x190
[    1.154933]  show_stack+0x14/0x20
[    1.154940]  dump_stack+0xe0/0x148
[    1.154946]  ___might_sleep+0x150/0x1f0
[    1.154952]  __might_sleep+0x4c/0x80
[    1.154957]  wait_for_completion_timeout+0x40/0x140
[    1.154964]  ti_sci_set_device_state+0xa0/0x158
[    1.154969]  ti_sci_cmd_get_device_exclusive+0x14/0x20
[    1.154977]  ti_sci_dev_start+0x34/0x50
[    1.154984]  genpd_runtime_resume+0x78/0x1f8
[    1.154991]  __rpm_callback+0x3c/0x140
[    1.154996]  rpm_callback+0x20/0x80
[    1.155001]  rpm_resume+0x568/0x758
[    1.155007]  __pm_runtime_resume+0x44/0xb0
[    1.155013]  omap8250_probe+0x2b4/0x508
[    1.155019]  platform_drv_probe+0x50/0xa0
[    1.155023]  really_probe+0xd4/0x318
[    1.155028]  driver_probe_device+0x54/0xe8
[    1.155033]  __device_attach_driver+0x80/0xb8
[    1.155039]  bus_for_each_drv+0x74/0xc0
[    1.155044]  __device_attach+0xdc/0x138
[    1.155049]  device_initial_probe+0x10/0x18
[    1.155053]  bus_probe_device+0x98/0xa0
[    1.155058]  deferred_probe_work_func+0x74/0xb0
[    1.155063]  process_one_work+0x280/0x6e8
[    1.155068]  worker_thread+0x48/0x430
[    1.155073]  kthread+0x108/0x138
[    1.155079]  ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18

To fix the bug we need to first call pm_runtime_enable() prior to any
pm_runtime calls.

Reported-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200320125200.6772-1-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit 71a174b ]

b6da31b "tty: Fix data race in tty_insert_flip_string_fixed_flag"
puts tty_flip_buffer_push under port->lock introducing the following
possible circular locking dependency:

[30129.876566] ======================================================
[30129.876566] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[30129.876567] 5.9.0-rc2+ #3 Tainted: G S      W
[30129.876568] ------------------------------------------------------
[30129.876568] sysrq.sh/1222 is trying to acquire lock:
[30129.876569] ffffffff92c39480 (console_owner){....}-{0:0}, at: console_unlock+0x3fe/0xa90

[30129.876572] but task is already holding lock:
[30129.876572] ffff888107cb9018 (&pool->lock/1){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: show_workqueue_state.cold.55+0x15b/0x6ca

[30129.876576] which lock already depends on the new lock.

[30129.876577] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

[30129.876578] -> #3 (&pool->lock/1){-.-.}-{2:2}:
[30129.876581]        _raw_spin_lock+0x30/0x70
[30129.876581]        __queue_work+0x1a3/0x10f0
[30129.876582]        queue_work_on+0x78/0x80
[30129.876582]        pty_write+0x165/0x1e0
[30129.876583]        n_tty_write+0x47f/0xf00
[30129.876583]        tty_write+0x3d6/0x8d0
[30129.876584]        vfs_write+0x1a8/0x650

[30129.876588] -> #2 (&port->lock#2){-.-.}-{2:2}:
[30129.876590]        _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3b/0x80
[30129.876591]        tty_port_tty_get+0x1d/0xb0
[30129.876592]        tty_port_default_wakeup+0xb/0x30
[30129.876592]        serial8250_tx_chars+0x3d6/0x970
[30129.876593]        serial8250_handle_irq.part.12+0x216/0x380
[30129.876593]        serial8250_default_handle_irq+0x82/0xe0
[30129.876594]        serial8250_interrupt+0xdd/0x1b0
[30129.876595]        __handle_irq_event_percpu+0xfc/0x850

[30129.876602] -> #1 (&port->lock){-.-.}-{2:2}:
[30129.876605]        _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3b/0x80
[30129.876605]        serial8250_console_write+0x12d/0x900
[30129.876606]        console_unlock+0x679/0xa90
[30129.876606]        register_console+0x371/0x6e0
[30129.876607]        univ8250_console_init+0x24/0x27
[30129.876607]        console_init+0x2f9/0x45e

[30129.876609] -> #0 (console_owner){....}-{0:0}:
[30129.876611]        __lock_acquire+0x2f70/0x4e90
[30129.876612]        lock_acquire+0x1ac/0xad0
[30129.876612]        console_unlock+0x460/0xa90
[30129.876613]        vprintk_emit+0x130/0x420
[30129.876613]        printk+0x9f/0xc5
[30129.876614]        show_pwq+0x154/0x618
[30129.876615]        show_workqueue_state.cold.55+0x193/0x6ca
[30129.876615]        __handle_sysrq+0x244/0x460
[30129.876616]        write_sysrq_trigger+0x48/0x4a
[30129.876616]        proc_reg_write+0x1a6/0x240
[30129.876617]        vfs_write+0x1a8/0x650

[30129.876619] other info that might help us debug this:

[30129.876620] Chain exists of:
[30129.876621]   console_owner --> &port->lock#2 --> &pool->lock/1

[30129.876625]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

[30129.876626]        CPU0                    CPU1
[30129.876626]        ----                    ----
[30129.876627]   lock(&pool->lock/1);
[30129.876628]                                lock(&port->lock#2);
[30129.876630]                                lock(&pool->lock/1);
[30129.876631]   lock(console_owner);

[30129.876633]  *** DEADLOCK ***

[30129.876634] 5 locks held by sysrq.sh/1222:
[30129.876634]  #0: ffff8881d3ce0470 (sb_writers#3){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: vfs_write+0x359/0x650
[30129.876637]  #1: ffffffff92c612c0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __handle_sysrq+0x4d/0x460
[30129.876640]  #2: ffffffff92c612c0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: show_workqueue_state+0x5/0xf0
[30129.876642]  #3: ffff888107cb9018 (&pool->lock/1){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: show_workqueue_state.cold.55+0x15b/0x6ca
[30129.876645]  thesofproject#4: ffffffff92c39980 (console_lock){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: vprintk_emit+0x123/0x420

[30129.876648] stack backtrace:
[30129.876649] CPU: 3 PID: 1222 Comm: sysrq.sh Tainted: G S      W         5.9.0-rc2+ #3
[30129.876649] Hardware name: Intel Corporation 2012 Client Platform/Emerald Lake 2, BIOS ACRVMBY1.86C.0078.P00.1201161002 01/16/2012
[30129.876650] Call Trace:
[30129.876650]  dump_stack+0x9d/0xe0
[30129.876651]  check_noncircular+0x34f/0x410
[30129.876653]  __lock_acquire+0x2f70/0x4e90
[30129.876656]  lock_acquire+0x1ac/0xad0
[30129.876658]  console_unlock+0x460/0xa90
[30129.876660]  vprintk_emit+0x130/0x420
[30129.876660]  printk+0x9f/0xc5
[30129.876661]  show_pwq+0x154/0x618
[30129.876662]  show_workqueue_state.cold.55+0x193/0x6ca
[30129.876664]  __handle_sysrq+0x244/0x460
[30129.876665]  write_sysrq_trigger+0x48/0x4a
[30129.876665]  proc_reg_write+0x1a6/0x240
[30129.876666]  vfs_write+0x1a8/0x650

It looks like the commit was aimed to protect tty_insert_flip_string and
there is no need for tty_flip_buffer_push to be under this lock.

Fixes: b6da31b ("tty: Fix data race in tty_insert_flip_string_fixed_flag")
Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <asavkov@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200902120045.3693075-1-asavkov@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

With lockdeps enabled, we get the following warning:

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
------------------------------------------------------
kworker/u12:1/53 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff80000adce220 (coresight_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: coresight_set_assoc_ectdev_mutex+0x3c/0x5c
but task is already holding lock:
ffff80000add1f60 (ect_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: cti_probe+0x318/0x394

which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #1 (ect_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}:
       __mutex_lock_common+0xd8/0xe60
       mutex_lock_nested+0x44/0x50
       cti_add_assoc_to_csdev+0x4c/0x184
       coresight_register+0x2f0/0x314
       tmc_probe+0x33c/0x414

-> #0 (coresight_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}:
       __lock_acquire+0x1a20/0x32d0
       lock_acquire+0x160/0x308
       __mutex_lock_common+0xd8/0xe60
       mutex_lock_nested+0x44/0x50
       coresight_set_assoc_ectdev_mutex+0x3c/0x5c
       cti_update_conn_xrefs+0x6c/0xf8
       cti_probe+0x33c/0x394

other info that might help us debug this:
 Possible unsafe locking scenario:
       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(ect_mutex);
                               lock(coresight_mutex);
                               lock(ect_mutex);
  lock(coresight_mutex);
 *** DEADLOCK ***

4 locks held by kworker/u12:1/53:
 #0: ((wq_completion)events_unbound){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1fc/0x63c
 #1: (deferred_probe_work){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x228/0x63c
 #2: (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __device_attach+0x48/0x1a8
 #3: (ect_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: cti_probe+0x318/0x394

To fix the same, call cti_add_assoc_to_csdev without the holding
coresight_mutex and confine the locking while setting the associated
ect / cti device using coresight_set_assoc_ectdev_mutex().

Fixes: 177af82 ("coresight: cti: Enable CTI associated with devices")
Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>
Cc: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220721130329.3787211-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com

…locator'

Hou Tao says:

====================

From: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>

Hi,

The patchset aims to fix one problem of bpf memory allocator destruction
when there is PREEMPT_RT kernel or kernel with arch_irq_work_has_interrupt()
being false (e.g. 1-cpu arm32 host or mips). The root cause is that
there may be busy refill_work when the allocator is destroying and it
may incur oops or other problems as shown in patch #1. Patch #1 fixes
the problem by waiting for the completion of irq work during destroying
and patch #2 is just a clean-up patch based on patch #1. Please see
individual patches for more details.

Comments are always welcome.

Change Log:
v2:
  * patch 1: fix typos and add notes about the overhead of irq_work_sync()
  * patch 1 & 2: add Acked-by tags from sdf@google.com

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221019115539.983394-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com/T/#t
====================

Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>