Skip to content

podman-remote import|export#2227

Merged
openshift-merge-robot merged 1 commit intocontainers:masterfrom
baude:remoteexport
Feb 5, 2019
Merged

podman-remote import|export#2227
openshift-merge-robot merged 1 commit intocontainers:masterfrom
baude:remoteexport

Conversation

@baude
Copy link
Member

@baude baude commented Jan 29, 2019

addition of import and export for the podman-remote client. This includes
the ability to send and receive files between the remote-client and the
"podman" host using an upgraded varlink connection.

Signed-off-by: baude bbaude@redhat.com

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: baude

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/XL labels Jan 29, 2019
@baude baude requested review from jwhonce and rhatdan and removed request for mheon and umohnani8 January 29, 2019 01:10
@rh-atomic-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #2205) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@baude baude force-pushed the remoteexport branch 2 times, most recently from 3550a94 to d7f18fc Compare January 30, 2019 20:53
@baude
Copy link
Member Author

baude commented Feb 4, 2019

/retest

@baude
Copy link
Member Author

baude commented Feb 4, 2019

bot, retest this please

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Couldn't the client code "proxy" /dev/stdout to a temporary file? I understand the API not doing this extra work but the client could "hide" the difference. Yes, local vs remote will be faster without the hop but that is going to be true anyway.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can we add that as an RFE?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would add a note in the comments detailing the connection state if r.Connect() fails? Is the old connection still open? still upgraded? still ...

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are we forking here? Otherwise, it looks like we're done always between #134-139

@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented Feb 4, 2019

LGTM

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Feb 5, 2019

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 5, 2019
addition of import and export for the podman-remote client.  This includes
the ability to send and receive files between the remote-client and the
"podman" host using an upgraded varlink connection.

Signed-off-by: baude <bbaude@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 5, 2019
@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Feb 5, 2019

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 5, 2019
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 650e242 into containers:master Feb 5, 2019
@baude baude deleted the remoteexport branch December 22, 2019 19:05
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 25, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 25, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants